An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1967
Nicole M Lee, Matthew S VanDyke, Alan Abitbol, Kaylynne Wallace, Christina Meneses
{"title":"An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations.","authors":"Nicole M Lee, Matthew S VanDyke, Alan Abitbol, Kaylynne Wallace, Christina Meneses","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has become incredibly popular for assessing health risk related to specific diseases. However, how this risk is conveyed and whether the limitations of the tests are fully communicated can impact how customers interpret results. Through a qualitative content analysis of three different DTC genetic testing online portals, we examine how companies communicate relative and absolute health risks, the extent to which limitations are communicated, and how this information is presented. Findings suggest that relative risk was more prominently communicated than absolute risk and that it was used to organize and prioritize results. Further, risk information was often communicated using statistical terms and concepts that may not be accessible to all users. Test limitations that were communicated included the inability to diagnose a disease, the importance of lifestyle factors, and that the tests do not account for all genetic variants. Although companies included this information, it was not visually prominent.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has become incredibly popular for assessing health risk related to specific diseases. However, how this risk is conveyed and whether the limitations of the tests are fully communicated can impact how customers interpret results. Through a qualitative content analysis of three different DTC genetic testing online portals, we examine how companies communicate relative and absolute health risks, the extent to which limitations are communicated, and how this information is presented. Findings suggest that relative risk was more prominently communicated than absolute risk and that it was used to organize and prioritize results. Further, risk information was often communicated using statistical terms and concepts that may not be accessible to all users. Test limitations that were communicated included the inability to diagnose a disease, the importance of lifestyle factors, and that the tests do not account for all genetic variants. Although companies included this information, it was not visually prominent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析直接面向消费者的基因检测门户网站及其对健康风险和检测限制的宣传。
在评估与特定疾病相关的健康风险方面,直接面向消费者(DTC)的基因检测已变得异常流行。然而,如何传达这种风险以及是否充分传达测试的局限性会影响客户如何解读结果。通过对三个不同的 DTC 基因检测在线门户网站进行定性内容分析,我们研究了公司如何传达相对和绝对的健康风险、在多大程度上传达了局限性以及如何呈现这些信息。研究结果表明,相对风险比绝对风险更受关注,而且相对风险被用来组织和优先处理检测结果。此外,风险信息通常使用统计术语和概念来传达,而这些术语和概念可能并不适合所有用户。所传达的测试局限性包括无法诊断疾病、生活方式因素的重要性以及测试并不考虑所有基因变异。尽管公司包含了这些信息,但这些信息并不醒目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
The current landscape of clinical exome and genome reanalysis in the U.S. A cross-sectional survey-based exploration of diversity in the admissions committees and student cohorts of genetic counseling programs over time. An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations. Patient perceptions of genetic counselors' role and emotional support needs in adults with Parkinson's disease Clinical genetic counselors' use of people‐ and identity‐first language in regard to patients' identification with disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1