Paul Faya, Tianhui Zhang, Wendy Walton, Steven Novick
{"title":"Non-constant mean relative potency for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity assays.","authors":"Paul Faya, Tianhui Zhang, Wendy Walton, Steven Novick","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2024.2403435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioassays are regulated, analytical methods used to ensure proper activity (potency) of biological products at release and during long-term storage. Potency is commonly reported on a relative basis by comparing and calibrating a concentration-response curve from the test material to that of a reference standard material. The relative potency approach depends on an assumption that the two concentration-response curves exhibit similar (equivalent) shapes, except for a potency shift. In certain circumstances, however, biological factors preclude the similarity assumption, and the traditional approach becomes unworkable. The antibody-mediated cytotoxicity assay is one example where the similarity assumption does not always hold. Other examples also arise in the fields of toxicology and pharmacology. In this work, we present a non-constant mean relative potency approach which averages the relative potency across a common range of the concentration-response curves. The proposed method captures the changing nature of the relative potency into a summary statistic that can be reported for batch calibration and quality control purposes. We provide inferential methods for this statistic and summarize the results of a simulation comparing these methods across a number of non-constant relative potency scenarios and assay conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2403435","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bioassays are regulated, analytical methods used to ensure proper activity (potency) of biological products at release and during long-term storage. Potency is commonly reported on a relative basis by comparing and calibrating a concentration-response curve from the test material to that of a reference standard material. The relative potency approach depends on an assumption that the two concentration-response curves exhibit similar (equivalent) shapes, except for a potency shift. In certain circumstances, however, biological factors preclude the similarity assumption, and the traditional approach becomes unworkable. The antibody-mediated cytotoxicity assay is one example where the similarity assumption does not always hold. Other examples also arise in the fields of toxicology and pharmacology. In this work, we present a non-constant mean relative potency approach which averages the relative potency across a common range of the concentration-response curves. The proposed method captures the changing nature of the relative potency into a summary statistic that can be reported for batch calibration and quality control purposes. We provide inferential methods for this statistic and summarize the results of a simulation comparing these methods across a number of non-constant relative potency scenarios and assay conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers:
Drug, device, and biological research and development;
Drug screening and drug design;
Assessment of pharmacological activity;
Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up;
Preclinical safety assessment;
Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics;
Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs;
Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety;
Postmarketing surveillance;
Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.