Influence of variance component estimates on genomic predictions for growth and reproductive-related traits in Nellore cattle.

IF 1.9 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/jbg.12900
Daniel Cardona-Cifuentes, Juan Diego Rodriguez Neira, Lucia G Albuquerque, Rafael Espigolan, Luis Gabriel Gonzalez-Herrera, Sabrina Thaise Amorim, Rodrigo D López-Correa, Ignacio Aguilar, Fernando Baldi
{"title":"Influence of variance component estimates on genomic predictions for growth and reproductive-related traits in Nellore cattle.","authors":"Daniel Cardona-Cifuentes, Juan Diego Rodriguez Neira, Lucia G Albuquerque, Rafael Espigolan, Luis Gabriel Gonzalez-Herrera, Sabrina Thaise Amorim, Rodrigo D López-Correa, Ignacio Aguilar, Fernando Baldi","doi":"10.1111/jbg.12900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to estimate variance components (VCs) for growth and reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using two relationship matrices (pedigree relationship A matrix and pedigree plus genomic relationship H matrix), and records collected before and after genomic selection (GS) implementation. The study also evaluated how genomic breeding values (GEBV) are affected by variance components and discarding old records. The analysed traits were weight at 120 days (W120), weight and scrotal circumference at 450 days (W450 and SC450, respectively). Three datasets were used to estimate VCs, including all phenotypic information (All) or records for animals born before or after GS implementation (Before or After datasets, respectively). Both relationship matrices were considered for VC estimation, the A matrix was used in all three datasets and VC from each combination were named as A_Before, A_After, and A_All). The H was used in two datasets: H_All and H_After. Different VCs were used for GEBV prediction through ssGBLUP. This step used two possible Datasets, using all available phenotypic data (Dataset 1) or just records collected since GS implementation (Dataset 2). Validation was conducted using accuracy, bias and dispersion according to the LR method and prediction accuracy from corrected phenotypes. The heritability of all traits increased from A_Before to A_After, while estimates for A_All were intermediary. In the previous order, the estimates were 0.16, 0.17, and 0.15 for W120; 0.31, 0.39, and 0.35 for W450; 0.35, 0.47, and 0.41 for SC. For W450 and SC, using the H matrix reduced the heritability (0.33 and 0.32 for W450; 0.41 and 0.38 for SC for H_After and H_All, respectively). For W120, Dataset1 and VCs from A_After showed the highest accuracy for direct and maternal GEBV (0.953 and 0.868). For W450, Dataset 1 and VC from H_After allowed the highest accuracy (0.854) but use Dataset 2 and same VC source yield similar value (0.846). For SC, Dataset 2 with VC from H_After showed the highest accuracy (0.925). To use Dataset 2 does not cause important changes in bias or dispersion with respect to Dataset 1. The VC and genetic parameters changed for W120, W450, and SC450, using records before or after the GS implementation. For W450 and SC450, genetic variance and heritability estimates increased with the use of GS. For W120, genomic predictions were more accurate using A for VC estimation. Accuracy gains were observed for W450 and SC450 using H in VC estimation and/or discarding records before GS. It is possible to discard phenotypic records before GS implementation without generating bias or dispersion in the GEBV of young candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":54885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate variance components (VCs) for growth and reproductive traits in Nellore cattle using two relationship matrices (pedigree relationship A matrix and pedigree plus genomic relationship H matrix), and records collected before and after genomic selection (GS) implementation. The study also evaluated how genomic breeding values (GEBV) are affected by variance components and discarding old records. The analysed traits were weight at 120 days (W120), weight and scrotal circumference at 450 days (W450 and SC450, respectively). Three datasets were used to estimate VCs, including all phenotypic information (All) or records for animals born before or after GS implementation (Before or After datasets, respectively). Both relationship matrices were considered for VC estimation, the A matrix was used in all three datasets and VC from each combination were named as A_Before, A_After, and A_All). The H was used in two datasets: H_All and H_After. Different VCs were used for GEBV prediction through ssGBLUP. This step used two possible Datasets, using all available phenotypic data (Dataset 1) or just records collected since GS implementation (Dataset 2). Validation was conducted using accuracy, bias and dispersion according to the LR method and prediction accuracy from corrected phenotypes. The heritability of all traits increased from A_Before to A_After, while estimates for A_All were intermediary. In the previous order, the estimates were 0.16, 0.17, and 0.15 for W120; 0.31, 0.39, and 0.35 for W450; 0.35, 0.47, and 0.41 for SC. For W450 and SC, using the H matrix reduced the heritability (0.33 and 0.32 for W450; 0.41 and 0.38 for SC for H_After and H_All, respectively). For W120, Dataset1 and VCs from A_After showed the highest accuracy for direct and maternal GEBV (0.953 and 0.868). For W450, Dataset 1 and VC from H_After allowed the highest accuracy (0.854) but use Dataset 2 and same VC source yield similar value (0.846). For SC, Dataset 2 with VC from H_After showed the highest accuracy (0.925). To use Dataset 2 does not cause important changes in bias or dispersion with respect to Dataset 1. The VC and genetic parameters changed for W120, W450, and SC450, using records before or after the GS implementation. For W450 and SC450, genetic variance and heritability estimates increased with the use of GS. For W120, genomic predictions were more accurate using A for VC estimation. Accuracy gains were observed for W450 and SC450 using H in VC estimation and/or discarding records before GS. It is possible to discard phenotypic records before GS implementation without generating bias or dispersion in the GEBV of young candidates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变异成分估计值对内洛尔牛生长和繁殖相关性状基因组预测的影响
本研究旨在利用两个关系矩阵(血统关系矩阵 A 和血统加基因组关系矩阵 H)以及基因组选择(GS)实施前后收集的记录,估算内洛尔牛生长和繁殖性状的方差分量(VCs)。研究还评估了基因组育种值(GEBV)如何受到方差成分和剔除旧记录的影响。分析的性状包括 120 天时的体重(W120)、450 天时的体重和阴囊周长(分别为 W450 和 SC450)。有三种数据集可用于估算VCs,包括所有表型信息(全部)或GS实施前或实施后出生的动物记录(分别为实施前或实施后数据集)。两个关系矩阵都被用于估算变异系数,A 矩阵被用于所有三个数据集,每个组合的变异系数被命名为 A_Before、A_After 和 A_All)。两个数据集使用了 H 矩阵:H_All 和 H_After。通过 ssGBLUP 使用不同的 VC 预测 GEBV。该步骤使用了两种可能的数据集,即使用所有可用的表型数据(数据集 1)或仅使用自 GS 实施以来收集的记录(数据集 2)。根据 LR 方法和校正表型的预测准确度,使用准确度、偏差和离散度进行了验证。从 A_Before 到 A_After,所有性状的遗传率都在增加,而 A_All 的估计值处于中间水平。按照前一顺序,W120 的估计值分别为 0.16、0.17 和 0.15;W450 的估计值分别为 0.31、0.39 和 0.35;SC 的估计值分别为 0.35、0.47 和 0.41。对于 W450 和 SC,使用 H 矩阵降低了遗传率(W450 的 H_After 和 H_All 分别为 0.33 和 0.32;SC 的 H_After 和 H_All 分别为 0.41 和 0.38)。对于 W120,数据集 1 和来自 A_After 的 VC 对直系和母系 GEBV 的准确性最高(0.953 和 0.868)。对于 W450,数据集 1 和来自 H_After 的 VC 的准确度最高(0.854),但使用数据集 2 和相同的 VC 来源得出的准确度值相近(0.846)。对于 SC,数据集 2 和来自 H_After 的 VC 显示出最高的准确度(0.925)。与数据集 1 相比,使用数据集 2 不会导致偏差或分散性发生重大变化。使用 GS 实施前后的记录,W120、W450 和 SC450 的 VC 和遗传参数发生了变化。对于 W450 和 SC450,遗传变异和遗传率估计值随着 GS 的使用而增加。对于 W120,使用 A 进行 VC 估计,基因组预测更为准确。在 W450 和 SC450 中,使用 H 估算 VC 和/或在 GS 之前丢弃记录可提高准确性。在实施 GS 之前丢弃表型记录不会对年轻候选者的 GEBV 产生偏差或分散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics publishes original articles by international scientists on genomic selection, and any other topic related to breeding programmes, selection, quantitative genetic, genomics, diversity and evolution of domestic animals. Researchers, teachers, and the animal breeding industry will find the reports of interest. Book reviews appear in many issues.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Influence of variance component estimates on genomic predictions for growth and reproductive-related traits in Nellore cattle. Genomic selection strategies for the German Merino sheep breeding programme - A simulation study. Correction to: Rahbar et al., 2023. Defining desired genetic gains for Pacific white shrimp (Litopeneaus vannamei) breeding objectives using participatory approaches. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. 2024;141:390-402. Combining genomics and semen microbiome increases the accuracy of predicting bull prolificacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1