Individual, dyadic, collaborative planning, physical activity, and nutrition: A randomized controlled trial in parent-child dyads.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1037/hea0001405
Ewa Kulis, Zofia Szczuka, Anna Banik, Maria Siwa, Monika Boberska, Dominika Wietrzykowska, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Ryan E Rhodes, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Nina Knoll, Urte Scholz, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"Individual, dyadic, collaborative planning, physical activity, and nutrition: A randomized controlled trial in parent-child dyads.","authors":"Ewa Kulis, Zofia Szczuka, Anna Banik, Maria Siwa, Monika Boberska, Dominika Wietrzykowska, Hanna Zaleskiewicz, Ryan E Rhodes, Theda Radtke, Konstantin Schenkel, Nina Knoll, Urte Scholz, Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1037/hea0001405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was designed to investigate the effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; primary outcome) and energy-dense food intake (secondary outcome) in dyads of parents and their 9-15-year-old children. Individual planning reflects an \"I-for-me\" planning of one person's behavior. Collaborative (\"we-for-us\") planning refers to joint planning of both dyad members' behavior, whereas dyadic (\"we-for-me\") planning involves joint planning of only the target person's behavior.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong><i>N</i> = 247 dyads participated in a randomized controlled trial with individual, dyadic, or collaborative physical activity (PA) planning and control conditions (education about PA, sedentary behavior, nutrition, energy intake-expenditure balance). MVPA was measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers at baseline, 1-week, and 36-week follow-ups. Energy-dense food intake was self-reported at baseline, 9-week, and 36-week follow-ups. Linear mixed models were fit for parents and children separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 36-week follow-up, children in the dyadic \"we-for-me\" planning condition decreased their MVPA compared to the control condition. At the same time, children in the dyadic planning condition also decreased energy-dense food intake at the 36-week follow-up. No effects were found among children in individual and collaborative PA planning conditions. Parents in any experimental conditions decreased energy-dense food intake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children's decrease in MVPA in dyadic PA planning condition was offset by a reduction of energy intake, which may represent a compensatory mechanism. The limited effectiveness of the dyadic \"we-for-me\" interventions in parent-child dyads may result from young people's needs for individuation and their reactance to parental support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001405","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effects of individual, dyadic, and collaborative planning on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; primary outcome) and energy-dense food intake (secondary outcome) in dyads of parents and their 9-15-year-old children. Individual planning reflects an "I-for-me" planning of one person's behavior. Collaborative ("we-for-us") planning refers to joint planning of both dyad members' behavior, whereas dyadic ("we-for-me") planning involves joint planning of only the target person's behavior.

Method: N = 247 dyads participated in a randomized controlled trial with individual, dyadic, or collaborative physical activity (PA) planning and control conditions (education about PA, sedentary behavior, nutrition, energy intake-expenditure balance). MVPA was measured with ActiGraph wGT3X-BT accelerometers at baseline, 1-week, and 36-week follow-ups. Energy-dense food intake was self-reported at baseline, 9-week, and 36-week follow-ups. Linear mixed models were fit for parents and children separately.

Results: At the 36-week follow-up, children in the dyadic "we-for-me" planning condition decreased their MVPA compared to the control condition. At the same time, children in the dyadic planning condition also decreased energy-dense food intake at the 36-week follow-up. No effects were found among children in individual and collaborative PA planning conditions. Parents in any experimental conditions decreased energy-dense food intake.

Conclusions: Children's decrease in MVPA in dyadic PA planning condition was offset by a reduction of energy intake, which may represent a compensatory mechanism. The limited effectiveness of the dyadic "we-for-me" interventions in parent-child dyads may result from young people's needs for individuation and their reactance to parental support. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人、家庭、合作规划、体育活动和营养:亲子二人组随机对照试验。
研究目的本研究旨在调查个人计划、家庭计划和合作计划对父母及其 9-15 岁子女的中度到剧烈运动(MVPA;主要结果)和高能量食物摄入(次要结果)的影响。个人计划反映了 "我为人人 "的个人行为计划。协作式("我们为我们")计划是指共同计划双亲的行为,而双亲式("我们为我")计划只涉及共同计划目标人的行为:方法:247 个二人组参加了随机对照试验,其中包括个人、二人组或合作体育锻炼(PA)计划和对照条件(有关体育锻炼、久坐行为、营养、能量摄入-支出平衡的教育)。在基线、1 周和 36 周的随访中,使用 ActiGraph wGT3X-BT 加速计测量 MVPA。高能量食物摄入量是在基线、9 周和 36 周随访时自我报告的。分别对家长和儿童进行线性混合模型拟合:结果:在 36 周的随访中,与对照组相比,在 "我为人人 "计划条件下的儿童减少了 MVPA。与此同时,在 36 周的跟踪调查中,处于 "我们为我 "计划条件下的儿童也减少了高能量食物的摄入量。在个人和协作式活动量规划条件下,儿童的活动量没有受到影响。任何实验条件下的家长都减少了高能量食物的摄入量:结论:在双人活动规划条件下,儿童 MVPA 的减少被能量摄入的减少所抵消,这可能是一种补偿机制。亲子二人组中 "我为人人 "的干预效果有限,这可能是由于青少年需要个性化以及他们对父母支持的反应。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1