Comparing the Predictive Value of SOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Early Hours of Hospitalization of Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Archives of Iranian Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.34172/aim.28567
Mahdi Majidazar, Farzaneh Hamidi, Nazanin Masoudi, Zahra Vand-Rajabpour, Seyed Pouya Paknezhad
{"title":"Comparing the Predictive Value of SOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Early Hours of Hospitalization of Sepsis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Mahdi Majidazar, Farzaneh Hamidi, Nazanin Masoudi, Zahra Vand-Rajabpour, Seyed Pouya Paknezhad","doi":"10.34172/aim.28567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis, a deadly infection causing organ failure and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), is detected early in hospitalization using the SIRS criteria, while sequential organ failure (SOFA) assesses organ failure severity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated to investigate the predictive value of the SIRS criteria and the SOFA system for mortality in early hospitalization of sepsis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Inclusion criteria were full reports in peer-reviewed journals with data on sepsis assessment using SOFA and SIRS, and their relationship with outcomes. For quality assessment, we considered study population, sepsis diagnosis criteria, and outcomes. The area under the curve (AUC) of these criteria was extracted for separate meta-analysis and forest plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included an average of 56.1% males and a mean age of 61.9 (±6.1) among 32,979 patients. The pooled AUC was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) for SIRS and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) for SOFA. Significant heterogeneity between studies was indicated by an I2 above 50%, leading to a meta-regression analysis. This analysis, with age and patient number as moderators, revealed age as the major cause of heterogeneity in comparing the predictive value of the SOFA score with SIRS regarding the in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SOFA score outperformed the SIRS criteria in predicting mortality, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines clinical judgment and other diagnostic tools for better patient management and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55469,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","volume":"27 8","pages":"439-446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11416697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Iranian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/aim.28567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis, a deadly infection causing organ failure and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), is detected early in hospitalization using the SIRS criteria, while sequential organ failure (SOFA) assesses organ failure severity. A systematic review and meta-analysis was evaluated to investigate the predictive value of the SIRS criteria and the SOFA system for mortality in early hospitalization of sepsis patients.

Methods: Inclusion criteria were full reports in peer-reviewed journals with data on sepsis assessment using SOFA and SIRS, and their relationship with outcomes. For quality assessment, we considered study population, sepsis diagnosis criteria, and outcomes. The area under the curve (AUC) of these criteria was extracted for separate meta-analysis and forest plots.

Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included an average of 56.1% males and a mean age of 61.9 (±6.1) among 32,979 patients. The pooled AUC was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60-0.73) for SIRS and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84) for SOFA. Significant heterogeneity between studies was indicated by an I2 above 50%, leading to a meta-regression analysis. This analysis, with age and patient number as moderators, revealed age as the major cause of heterogeneity in comparing the predictive value of the SOFA score with SIRS regarding the in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The SOFA score outperformed the SIRS criteria in predicting mortality, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach that combines clinical judgment and other diagnostic tools for better patient management and outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 SOFA 和 SIRS 对败血症患者住院早期死亡率的预测价值:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:败血症是一种导致器官衰竭和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)的致命感染,可在住院早期使用 SIRS 标准检测,而序贯器官衰竭(SOFA)可评估器官衰竭的严重程度。为了研究 SIRS 标准和 SOFA 系统对脓毒症患者早期住院死亡率的预测价值,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析评估:纳入标准为同行评审期刊中的完整报告,其中包含使用 SOFA 和 SIRS 评估脓毒症的数据及其与结果的关系。为了进行质量评估,我们考虑了研究人群、脓毒症诊断标准和结果。我们提取了这些标准的曲线下面积(AUC),用于单独的荟萃分析和森林图:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准。在 32979 名患者中,男性平均占 56.1%,平均年龄为 61.9(±6.1)岁。SIRS的集合AUC为0.67(95% CI:0.60-0.73),SOFA的集合AUC为0.79(95% CI:0.73-0.84)。I2超过50%表明研究之间存在显著异质性,因此需要进行元回归分析。该分析以年龄和患者人数为调节因子,结果显示,在比较SOFA评分与SIRS对脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测价值时,年龄是造成异质性的主要原因(PC结论:SOFA评分优于SIRS:在预测死亡率方面,SOFA评分优于SIRS标准,这强调了将临床判断与其他诊断工具相结合的综合方法的必要性,以改善患者管理和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Iranian Medicine
Archives of Iranian Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aim and Scope: The Archives of Iranian Medicine (AIM) is a monthly peer-reviewed multidisciplinary medical publication. The journal welcomes contributions particularly relevant to the Middle-East region and publishes biomedical experiences and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases in the region as well as analyses of factors that may modulate the incidence, course, and management of diseases and pertinent medical problems. Manuscripts with didactic orientation and subjects exclusively of local interest will not be considered for publication.The 2016 Impact Factor of "Archives of Iranian Medicine" is 1.20.
期刊最新文献
A Rare Anatomical Variation: Intrathoracic Liver Caudate Lobe: A Case Report. Clinicopathologic Effects of Xenogeneic GvHD Induced by Adoptively Transferred Human-Derived T Cells in Severely Immunodeficient Mice. Consequences of Infectious Disease Outbreaks in Ardabil (1925-1941): A Historical Analysis. First Case of Macrocephaly, Dysmorphic Facies, and Psychomotor Retardation Harboring Co-inherited Variants in HERC1 and PMP22 Genes from Iran: Two Novel Variants. Incidence and Risk Factors of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Southeastern Iran: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1