Evaluation of Mental Health First Aid Training and Simulated Psychosis Care Role-Plays for Pharmacy Education

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101288
Tina X. Ung, Claire L. O’Reilly, Rebekah J. Moles, Jack C. Collins, Ricki Ng, Lily Pham, Bandana Saini, Jennifer A. Ong, Timothy F. Chen, Carl R. Schneider, Sarira El-Den
{"title":"Evaluation of Mental Health First Aid Training and Simulated Psychosis Care Role-Plays for Pharmacy Education","authors":"Tina X. Ung,&nbsp;Claire L. O’Reilly,&nbsp;Rebekah J. Moles,&nbsp;Jack C. Collins,&nbsp;Ricki Ng,&nbsp;Lily Pham,&nbsp;Bandana Saini,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Ong,&nbsp;Timothy F. Chen,&nbsp;Carl R. Schneider,&nbsp;Sarira El-Den","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explored the impact of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training and simulated psychosis care role-plays on pharmacy students’ stigma, confidence, and behaviors when supporting people experiencing mental health symptoms or crises.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>MHFA training was delivered to final year pharmacy students. Post-MHFA training, students were invited to participate in simulated psychosis care role-plays (co-designed and content validated with mental health stakeholders) with trained actors. Role-plays were observed by peers, tutors, and mental health consumer educators (MHCEs). Students immediately engaged in self-assessment, feedback, and debrief discussions with peers, tutors, and MHCEs. Quantitative analyses (ANOVA and chi-square tests) were conducted on scores awarded by each rater (self, tutor, MHCE) and for each scenario (n = 3). Students completed a 15-item survey exploring mental health stigma and mental health confidence, at 3 timepoints (pre-MHFA training, post-MHFA training, and post-role-plays). Survey scores were analyzed using paired <em>t</em> tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 209 MHFA-trained students, 86 participated in role-play. The self-assessment mean score was the lowest and the MHCEs’ mean score highest. Post-MHFA training, 14 survey item scores significantly improved, implying reduced stigma and increased confidence in providing psychosis care. Post-role-play scores suggested improvements in 12 survey items.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Psychosis care role-plays are associated with short-term improvements in pharmacy students’ stigma and mental health confidence post-MHFA training; students’ self-assessment scores are lower than tutors and MHCEs. It is recommended that future studies further integrate observed behaviors with self-reported data and use simulated patients in clinical practice to evaluate MHFA outcomes longitudinally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 11","pages":"Article 101288"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explored the impact of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training and simulated psychosis care role-plays on pharmacy students’ stigma, confidence, and behaviors when supporting people experiencing mental health symptoms or crises.

Methods

MHFA training was delivered to final year pharmacy students. Post-MHFA training, students were invited to participate in simulated psychosis care role-plays (co-designed and content validated with mental health stakeholders) with trained actors. Role-plays were observed by peers, tutors, and mental health consumer educators (MHCEs). Students immediately engaged in self-assessment, feedback, and debrief discussions with peers, tutors, and MHCEs. Quantitative analyses (ANOVA and chi-square tests) were conducted on scores awarded by each rater (self, tutor, MHCE) and for each scenario (n = 3). Students completed a 15-item survey exploring mental health stigma and mental health confidence, at 3 timepoints (pre-MHFA training, post-MHFA training, and post-role-plays). Survey scores were analyzed using paired t tests.

Results

Of 209 MHFA-trained students, 86 participated in role-play. The self-assessment mean score was the lowest and the MHCEs’ mean score highest. Post-MHFA training, 14 survey item scores significantly improved, implying reduced stigma and increased confidence in providing psychosis care. Post-role-play scores suggested improvements in 12 survey items.

Conclusion

Psychosis care role-plays are associated with short-term improvements in pharmacy students’ stigma and mental health confidence post-MHFA training; students’ self-assessment scores are lower than tutors and MHCEs. It is recommended that future studies further integrate observed behaviors with self-reported data and use simulated patients in clinical practice to evaluate MHFA outcomes longitudinally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康急救培训和模拟精神病护理角色扮演对药学教育的评估。
研究目的本研究探讨了心理健康急救(MHFA)培训和模拟精神病护理角色扮演对药剂学专业学生在为出现心理健康症状或危机的人提供支持时的耻辱感、自信心和行为的影响:方法:为药剂学专业毕业班学生提供 MHFA 培训。MHFA培训结束后,学生应邀参加了模拟精神病护理角色扮演(与精神健康相关人员共同设计并对内容进行了验证)。同学、导师和心理健康消费者教育者(MHCEs)对角色扮演进行了观察。学生立即与同伴、辅导员和心理健康消费者教育者进行自我评估、反馈和汇报讨论。对每个评分者(自我评分者、辅导员评分者、心理健康消费者教育者评分者)和每个情景(n=3)的评分进行了定量分析(方差分析和卡方检验)。学生们在三个时间点(心理健康教育培训前、心理健康教育培训后、角色扮演后)完成了一项 15 个项目的调查,以探讨心理健康耻辱感和心理健康自信心。调查得分采用配对 t 检验进行分析:在 209 名接受过 MHFA 培训的学生中,有 86 人参加了角色扮演。自我评估的平均得分最低,MHCEs 的平均得分最高。接受 MHFA 培训后,14 个调查项目的得分明显提高,这意味着在提供思觉失调护理方面的耻辱感有所减轻,信心有所增强。角色扮演后的得分表明,12 个调查项目有所改善:精神病护理角色扮演与药剂学学生在 MHFA 培训后耻辱感和心理健康自信心的短期改善有关;学生的自我评估得分低于导师和心理健康教育专家。建议今后的研究进一步将观察行为与自我报告数据相结合,并在临床实践中使用模拟患者来纵向评估 MHFA 的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Student-Reported Preparedness in Leadership and Professional Service Management Post Capstone Course. A Multisite, Longitudinal Study Assessing Prevalence of Anxiety in Student Pharmacists. Association Of Emotional Intelligence With Pharmacy Students' Leadership And Academic Performance. Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility. Proof of Concept of ChatGPT as a Virtual Tutor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1