Cyclic vomiting syndrome in pediatric population: characteristics and prophylactic response to cyproheptadine.

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS Minerva Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07659-6
Alessandro Ferretti, Claudia Fanfoni, Federica Vadrucci, Mattia Mercier, Claudia Pacchiarotti, Maurizio Mennini, Pasquale Parisi, Giovanni DI Nardo
{"title":"Cyclic vomiting syndrome in pediatric population: characteristics and prophylactic response to cyproheptadine.","authors":"Alessandro Ferretti, Claudia Fanfoni, Federica Vadrucci, Mattia Mercier, Claudia Pacchiarotti, Maurizio Mennini, Pasquale Parisi, Giovanni DI Nardo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07659-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the features of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in a pediatric cohort and assess the safety and efficacy of cyproheptadine regardless of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, monocentric study enrolled children diagnosed with CVS. After collecting data from the medical records, a telephone-based questionnaire interview with the caregivers was conducted to obtain missing or unclear data. Prodromal symptoms, triggers, and comorbidities were analyzed. The safety and efficacy of cyproheptadine were evaluated in the entire patient cohort and compared between children under 5 years old and those 5 years of age or older.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 24 subjects with CVS were included. Prodromal symptoms were reported in 45.8%, triggers in 33.3%, and comorbidities in 58.3% of patients. Migraine was present in 54% of the patients. Cyproheptadine was prescribed to 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%), with 40% and 80% achieving a reduction in the frequency of vomiting clusters of over 75% after a median duration of 6.03 and 12.13 months respectively. Prophylactic therapy did not provide any benefit to 20% of the patients. No statistically significant differences were found in vomiting features or cyproheptadine response between children above and below 5 years, except for a negative correlation between age and the presence of diarrhea during CVS episodes. No serious adverse effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessment of prodromes, triggers, and comorbidities aids in CVS diagnosis in children. Cyproheptadine is effective and safe for the management of CVS regardless of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07659-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the features of cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) in a pediatric cohort and assess the safety and efficacy of cyproheptadine regardless of age.

Methods: This retrospective, monocentric study enrolled children diagnosed with CVS. After collecting data from the medical records, a telephone-based questionnaire interview with the caregivers was conducted to obtain missing or unclear data. Prodromal symptoms, triggers, and comorbidities were analyzed. The safety and efficacy of cyproheptadine were evaluated in the entire patient cohort and compared between children under 5 years old and those 5 years of age or older.

Results: A cohort of 24 subjects with CVS were included. Prodromal symptoms were reported in 45.8%, triggers in 33.3%, and comorbidities in 58.3% of patients. Migraine was present in 54% of the patients. Cyproheptadine was prescribed to 15 of the 24 patients (62.5%), with 40% and 80% achieving a reduction in the frequency of vomiting clusters of over 75% after a median duration of 6.03 and 12.13 months respectively. Prophylactic therapy did not provide any benefit to 20% of the patients. No statistically significant differences were found in vomiting features or cyproheptadine response between children above and below 5 years, except for a negative correlation between age and the presence of diarrhea during CVS episodes. No serious adverse effects were reported.

Conclusions: Assessment of prodromes, triggers, and comorbidities aids in CVS diagnosis in children. Cyproheptadine is effective and safe for the management of CVS regardless of age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿周期性呕吐综合征:特征和对环丙沙星的预防反应。
研究背景本研究旨在调查儿科群体中周期性呕吐综合征(CVS)的特征,并评估环丙沙星(cyproheptadine)的安全性和有效性,而不考虑年龄因素:这项回顾性、单中心研究招募了被诊断为 CVS 的儿童。从病历中收集数据后,对护理人员进行了电话问卷调查,以获得缺失或不清楚的数据。研究分析了前驱症状、诱发因素和合并症。对整个患者队列的环丙沙星安全性和有效性进行了评估,并在 5 岁以下儿童和 5 岁以上儿童之间进行了比较:结果:共纳入了 24 名 CVS 患者。45.8%的患者有前驱症状,33.3%的患者有诱发因素,58.3%的患者有合并症。54%的患者患有偏头痛。24 名患者中有 15 名(62.5%)接受了赛庚啶治疗,其中 40% 和 80% 的患者在中位持续时间分别为 6.03 个月和 12.13 个月后,呕吐集群的频率减少了 75% 以上。20%的患者在接受预防性治疗后没有获得任何益处。5岁以上和5岁以下儿童的呕吐特征或环丙沙星反应在统计学上没有发现明显差异,只是年龄与CVS发作期间腹泻的出现呈负相关。没有严重不良反应的报告:结论:对前驱症状、诱发因素和合并症的评估有助于儿童 CVS 的诊断。无论年龄大小,赛庚啶都能有效、安全地治疗 CVS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
期刊最新文献
An intranasal multicomponent medical device (Saflovir®) may represent a valuable option in managing upper airways diseases. Management of nocturnal enuresis in children. The role of combining anti-reflux and anti-drooling surgery in neurologically impaired children with chronic lung aspiration. Studying inborn errors of immunity to understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying highly prevalent immune-mediated diseases. Timing for reconstructive surgery in Hirschsprung disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1