Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.

Mirza Kovacevic, Visnja Nesek-Adam, Semir Klokic, Ekrema Mujaric
{"title":"Low T3 <i>vs</i> low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.","authors":"Mirza Kovacevic, Visnja Nesek-Adam, Semir Klokic, Ekrema Mujaric","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.96132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both phases of euthyroid sick syndrome (ESS) are associated with worse prognosis in septic shock patients. Although there are still no indications for supplementation therapy, there is no evidence that both phases (initial and prolonged) are adaptive or that only prolonged is maladaptive and requires supplementation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze clinical, hemodynamic and laboratory differences in two groups of septic shock patients with ESS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 47 septic shock patients with ESS were divided according to values of their thyroid hormones into low T3 and low T3T4 groups. The analysis included demographic data, mortality scores, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation length and 28-day survival and laboratory with hemodynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score (<i>P</i> = 0.029), dobutamine (<i>P</i> = 0.003) and epinephrine requirement (<i>P</i> = 0.000) and the incidence of renal failure and multiple organ failure (MOF) (<i>P</i> = 0.000) were significantly higher for the low T3T4. Hypoalbuminemia (<i>P</i> = 0.047), neutrophilia (<i>P</i> = 0.038), lymphopenia (<i>P</i> = 0.013) and lactatemia (<i>P</i> = 0.013) were more pronounced on T2 for the low T3T4 group compared to the low T3 group. Diastolic blood pressure at T0 (<i>P</i> = 0.017) and T1 (<i>P</i> = 0.007), as well as mean arterial pressure at T0 (<i>P</i> = 0.037) and T2 (<i>P</i> = 0.033) was higher for the low T3 group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low T3T4 population is associated with higher frequency of renal insufficiency and MOF, with worse laboratory and hemodynamic parameters. These findings suggest potentially maladaptive changes in the chronic phase of septic shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.96132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both phases of euthyroid sick syndrome (ESS) are associated with worse prognosis in septic shock patients. Although there are still no indications for supplementation therapy, there is no evidence that both phases (initial and prolonged) are adaptive or that only prolonged is maladaptive and requires supplementation.

Aim: To analyze clinical, hemodynamic and laboratory differences in two groups of septic shock patients with ESS.

Methods: A total of 47 septic shock patients with ESS were divided according to values of their thyroid hormones into low T3 and low T3T4 groups. The analysis included demographic data, mortality scores, intensive care unit stay, mechanical ventilation length and 28-day survival and laboratory with hemodynamics.

Results: The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II score (P = 0.029), dobutamine (P = 0.003) and epinephrine requirement (P = 0.000) and the incidence of renal failure and multiple organ failure (MOF) (P = 0.000) were significantly higher for the low T3T4. Hypoalbuminemia (P = 0.047), neutrophilia (P = 0.038), lymphopenia (P = 0.013) and lactatemia (P = 0.013) were more pronounced on T2 for the low T3T4 group compared to the low T3 group. Diastolic blood pressure at T0 (P = 0.017) and T1 (P = 0.007), as well as mean arterial pressure at T0 (P = 0.037) and T2 (P = 0.033) was higher for the low T3 group.

Conclusion: The low T3T4 population is associated with higher frequency of renal insufficiency and MOF, with worse laboratory and hemodynamic parameters. These findings suggest potentially maladaptive changes in the chronic phase of septic shock.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脓毒性休克患者的低T3与低T3T4甲状腺疾病综合征:前瞻性观察队列研究。
背景:脓毒性休克患者的甲状腺疾病综合征(ESS)的两个阶段都与预后恶化有关。目的:分析两组脓毒性休克患者在临床、血液动力学和实验室方面的差异:方法:根据甲状腺激素值将47名ESS脓毒性休克患者分为低T3组和低T3T4组。分析包括人口统计学数据、死亡率评分、重症监护室住院时间、机械通气时间和28天存活率以及血液动力学实验室:结果:低 T3T4 组的简化急性生理学评分 II 得分(P = 0.029)、多巴酚丁胺(P = 0.003)和肾上腺素需求量(P = 0.000)以及肾衰竭和多器官功能衰竭(MOF)发生率(P = 0.000)均显著高于 T3T4 组。与低T3组相比,低T3T4组在T2时更明显出现低白蛋白血症(P = 0.047)、中性粒细胞增多(P = 0.038)、淋巴细胞减少(P = 0.013)和乳酸血症(P = 0.013)。低T3组在T0(P = 0.017)和T1(P = 0.007)时的舒张压以及T0(P = 0.037)和T2(P = 0.033)时的平均动脉压均较高:结论:低 T3T4 组患者肾功能不全和 MOF 发生率较高,实验室和血液动力学参数较差。这些研究结果表明,在脓毒性休克的慢性阶段可能会出现适应不良的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1