Kamal Kumar, Fuhazia Horner, Mohamed Aly, Gopakumar S Nair, Cheng Lin
{"title":"Why do thoracic epidurals fail? A literature review on thoracic epidural failure and catheter confirmation.","authors":"Kamal Kumar, Fuhazia Horner, Mohamed Aly, Gopakumar S Nair, Cheng Lin","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been the gold standard of perioperative analgesia in various abdominal and thoracic surgeries. However, misplaced or displaced catheters, along with other factors such as technical challenges, equipment failure, and anatomic variation, lead to a high incidence of unsatisfactory analgesia. This article aims to assess the different sources of TEA failure and strategies to validate the location of thoracic epidural catheters. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was done. The search results were limited to randomized controlled trials. Literature suggests techniques such as electrophysiological stimulation, epidural waveform monitoring, and x-ray epidurography for identifying thoracic epidural placement, but there is no one particular superior confirmation method; clinicians are advised to select techniques that are practical and suitable for their patients and practice environment to maximize success.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v13.i3.94157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) has been the gold standard of perioperative analgesia in various abdominal and thoracic surgeries. However, misplaced or displaced catheters, along with other factors such as technical challenges, equipment failure, and anatomic variation, lead to a high incidence of unsatisfactory analgesia. This article aims to assess the different sources of TEA failure and strategies to validate the location of thoracic epidural catheters. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, and Google Scholar was done. The search results were limited to randomized controlled trials. Literature suggests techniques such as electrophysiological stimulation, epidural waveform monitoring, and x-ray epidurography for identifying thoracic epidural placement, but there is no one particular superior confirmation method; clinicians are advised to select techniques that are practical and suitable for their patients and practice environment to maximize success.
在各种腹部和胸部手术中,胸硬膜外麻醉(TEA)一直是围手术期镇痛的黄金标准。然而,导管错位或移位以及其他因素(如技术挑战、设备故障和解剖变异)导致镇痛效果不理想的发生率很高。本文旨在评估 TEA 失败的不同原因以及验证胸腔硬膜外导管位置的策略。我们对 PubMed、Medline、Science Direct 和 Google Scholar 进行了文献检索。搜索结果仅限于随机对照试验。文献建议采用电生理刺激、硬膜外波形监测和X光硬膜外造影等技术来确定胸腔硬膜外导管的位置,但没有一种特别优越的确认方法;建议临床医生选择实用且适合患者和实践环境的技术,以最大限度地提高成功率。