First-contact physiotherapists' perceived competency in a new model of care for low back pain patients: a mixed methods study.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.33393/aop.2024.3056
Amélie Kechichian, Elsa Viain, Thomas Lathière, François Desmeules, Nicolas Pinsault
{"title":"First-contact physiotherapists' perceived competency in a new model of care for low back pain patients: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Amélie Kechichian, Elsa Viain, Thomas Lathière, François Desmeules, Nicolas Pinsault","doi":"10.33393/aop.2024.3056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new advanced practice model of care enables French physiotherapists to perform medical acts for low back pain (LBP) patients as first-contact physiotherapists (FCPs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine the self-perceived competency of FCPs and to further explore factors underpinning this feeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A survey was used to self-assess the perceived competency of FCPs in performing medical tasks. Semi-structured interviews were then performed to explore determining factors of perceived competency. Inductive thematic analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine FCPs answered the survey and were interviewed (mean age 40.1, standard deviation [SD]: ±10.0). FCPs felt very competent with making medical diagnosis (3.44/4, SD: ±0.53), analgesic prescription (3.11, SD: ±0.78) and referring onward to physiotherapy (3.78, SD: ±0.55). They did not feel competent with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription (2.78, SD: ±0.67) and issuing sick leave certificate (2.67, SD: ±1.0). The main identified influencing factors were previous FCPs' experience, training, knowledge, collaboration with family physicians, high responsibility and risk management associated with decision-making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>French FCPs appeared to have the necessary skills to directly manage LBP patients without medical referral. Future training focusing on analgesic prescription and issuing sick leave certificate is however needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"14 ","pages":"56-64"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/aop.2024.3056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A new advanced practice model of care enables French physiotherapists to perform medical acts for low back pain (LBP) patients as first-contact physiotherapists (FCPs).

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the self-perceived competency of FCPs and to further explore factors underpinning this feeling.

Methods: A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A survey was used to self-assess the perceived competency of FCPs in performing medical tasks. Semi-structured interviews were then performed to explore determining factors of perceived competency. Inductive thematic analysis was performed.

Results: Nine FCPs answered the survey and were interviewed (mean age 40.1, standard deviation [SD]: ±10.0). FCPs felt very competent with making medical diagnosis (3.44/4, SD: ±0.53), analgesic prescription (3.11, SD: ±0.78) and referring onward to physiotherapy (3.78, SD: ±0.55). They did not feel competent with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription (2.78, SD: ±0.67) and issuing sick leave certificate (2.67, SD: ±1.0). The main identified influencing factors were previous FCPs' experience, training, knowledge, collaboration with family physicians, high responsibility and risk management associated with decision-making.

Conclusion: French FCPs appeared to have the necessary skills to directly manage LBP patients without medical referral. Future training focusing on analgesic prescription and issuing sick leave certificate is however needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首次接触理疗师在腰背痛患者护理新模式中的能力感知:一项混合方法研究。
背景一种新的高级护理实践模式使法国物理治疗师能够作为第一接触物理治疗师(FCP)为腰背痛(LBP)患者实施医疗行为:本研究旨在确定 FCP 的自我认知能力,并进一步探讨支撑这种感觉的因素:方法:采用混合方法解释性顺序设计。方法:采用解释性顺序设计的混合方法进行研究。调查用于自我评估外籍初级保健人员在执行医疗任务方面的能力。然后进行了半结构式访谈,以探讨感知能力的决定性因素。结果:九名全科医生回答了调查并接受了访谈(平均年龄 40.1 岁,标准差 [SD]:±10.0)。家庭医生认为自己非常胜任医疗诊断(3.44/4,标准差:±0.53)、镇痛处方(3.11,标准差:±0.78)和转诊物理治疗(3.78,标准差:±0.55)。他们认为自己无法胜任开具非甾体抗炎药处方(2.78,标准差:±0.67)和开具病假证明(2.67,标准差:±1.0)的工作。已确定的主要影响因素包括家庭医生的以往经验、培训、知识、与家庭医生的合作、高度责任感以及与决策相关的风险管理:结论:法国的家庭医生似乎具备在不转诊的情况下直接管理枸杞多糖症患者的必要技能。不过,今后还需要开展以镇痛处方和开具病假证明为重点的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study. Erratum in: Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger range of motion using a written protocol. A decade of growth: preserving the original meaning of research for physiotherapists. Neurological conditions and community-based physical activity: physical therapists' belief and actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1