Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Q3 Medicine Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.37349/etat.2024.00259
Shayan Smani, Vinaik Sundaresan, Soum D Lokeshwar, Ankur U Choksi, Jeffrey Carbonella, Joseph Brito, Joseph Renzulli, Preston Sprenkle, Michael S Leapman
{"title":"Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Shayan Smani, Vinaik Sundaresan, Soum D Lokeshwar, Ankur U Choksi, Jeffrey Carbonella, Joseph Brito, Joseph Renzulli, Preston Sprenkle, Michael S Leapman","doi":"10.37349/etat.2024.00259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.</p>","PeriodicalId":73002,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/etat.2024.00259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从前列腺活检到根治性前列腺切除术的 Gleason 评分升级风险因素。
准确识别前列腺癌格里森分级组仍然是临床局部疾病初始治疗的重要组成部分。然而,在接受手术治疗的患者中,多达三分之一的患者从活检到根治性前列腺切除术的过程中会出现格里森评分升级(GSU)的情况。对疾病降级的担忧仍然是诊断不确定性的一个来源,这既导致了对低危疾病的过度治疗,也导致了对高危前列腺癌的治疗不足。这篇综述研究了从活检到前列腺切除术最终病理学检查期间有关GSU风险因素的已发表文献。已确定的格里森升级风险因素包括患者的人口统计学和临床因素,包括年龄、体重指数、种族、前列腺体积,以及基于生物标志物的检测,包括前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度和睾酮值。此外,前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)结果也与前列腺增生症有关。与GSU相关的活检特异性特征包括活检核心数量较少、缺乏针对性方法以及活检核心阳性率可能增加。认识到疾病低估的风险因素可能会促使进行包括重复取样或成像在内的确证检查。影像引导活检技术的不断改进也可减少导致疾病分级不足的取样误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Deep learning based automated epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase status prediction of brain metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer Advancements and recent explorations of anti-cancer activity of chrysin: from molecular targets to therapeutic perspective Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability: misdiagnosis, pseudoprogression and/or tumor heterogeneity? Immunotherapy in thymic epithelial tumors: tissue predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors Spheroids and organoids derived from colorectal cancer as tools for in vitro drug screening
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1