Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies.

Frontiers in ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fopht.2024.1422466
Marc Ohlhausen, Bryant A Menke, Jack Begley, Sean Kim, Matthew R Debiec, Christopher D Conrady, Steven Yeh, Grant A Justin
{"title":"Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies.","authors":"Marc Ohlhausen, Bryant A Menke, Jack Begley, Sean Kim, Matthew R Debiec, Christopher D Conrady, Steven Yeh, Grant A Justin","doi":"10.3389/fopht.2024.1422466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) remain a severe complication of ocular trauma commonly encountered worldwide. This literature review aimed to discuss current practice patterns, areas of controversy, and advances in the management of IOFBs. Injuries involving IOFBs carry significant ocular morbidity and management can be extremely challenging. A systematic approach to preoperative evaluation and IOFB surgical management is detailed in this article and should be applied in each case. The location and composition of an IOFB have important implications on surgical approach and timing, especially in cases of toxic metals and vegetable matter. The advantages, disadvantages, and previous literature regarding immediate versus delayed foreign body removal are presented. Surgical approaches are described, with an emphasis on posterior chamber IOFB management and removal via pars plana vitrectomy. Final visual acuity is variable, but approaches have been used to prognosticate outcomes including the Ocular Trauma Score. By synthesizing current IOFB literature, the goal is to provide practitioners with guidance that will maximize the chances of surgical success and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73096,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11402607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fopht.2024.1422466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intraocular foreign bodies (IOFBs) remain a severe complication of ocular trauma commonly encountered worldwide. This literature review aimed to discuss current practice patterns, areas of controversy, and advances in the management of IOFBs. Injuries involving IOFBs carry significant ocular morbidity and management can be extremely challenging. A systematic approach to preoperative evaluation and IOFB surgical management is detailed in this article and should be applied in each case. The location and composition of an IOFB have important implications on surgical approach and timing, especially in cases of toxic metals and vegetable matter. The advantages, disadvantages, and previous literature regarding immediate versus delayed foreign body removal are presented. Surgical approaches are described, with an emphasis on posterior chamber IOFB management and removal via pars plana vitrectomy. Final visual acuity is variable, but approaches have been used to prognosticate outcomes including the Ocular Trauma Score. By synthesizing current IOFB literature, the goal is to provide practitioners with guidance that will maximize the chances of surgical success and patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内异物治疗的进展。
眼内异物(IOFBs)仍然是全世界常见的眼外伤严重并发症。这篇文献综述旨在讨论眼内异物目前的治疗模式、存在争议的领域以及眼内异物治疗的进展。涉及 IOFB 的损伤会导致严重的眼部发病率,处理起来也极具挑战性。本文详细介绍了术前评估和 IOFB 手术治疗的系统方法,应适用于每个病例。IOFB 的位置和成分对手术方法和时机有重要影响,尤其是在有毒金属和植物物质的病例中。文章介绍了立即取出异物与延迟取出异物的优缺点和以往文献。介绍了手术方法,重点是后房异物的处理和通过玻璃体旁切除术取出异物。最终视力是可变的,但已有方法用于预后,包括眼外伤评分。通过综合当前的 IOFB 文献,目的是为从业人员提供指导,最大限度地提高手术成功率和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100. UV light and the ocular lens: a review of exposure models and resulting biomolecular changes. Diagnostic accuracy of a modularized, virtual-reality-based automated pupillometer for detection of relative afferent pupillary defect in unilateral optic neuropathies. Advances in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Large animal model species in pluripotent stem cell therapy research and development for retinal diseases: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1