Rituals as Nature-Based Governance of reciprocity between people and nature.

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2024-08-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.17206.2
Carsten Herrmann-Pillath
{"title":"Rituals as Nature-Based Governance of reciprocity between people and nature.","authors":"Carsten Herrmann-Pillath","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.17206.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conventional approach to environmental governance, based on institutions, regulations, and interventions, has failed to stop the current ecological catastrophe. I suggest a radical alternative: Ritual as the core mode of 'nature-based governance' (NBG) that enacts deep and comprehensive reciprocity between people and nature. NBG grounds governance mechanisms in embodied more-than-human practices with normative force. I build on theories of embodiment to suggest a general concept of ritual that is inspired by but generalizes over Indigenous thought and is informed by East Asian ideas about ritual as the pivot of social order. Further, the embodiment framework recognises ritual as a kind of action humans and non-humans share as living beings. Therefore, rituals can be harnessed in workable governance mechanisms to create and sustain communities of multi-species cohabitation. I distinguish between two basic types of reciprocity corresponding to two types of governance: Disembodied reciprocity enacted by conventional human-only governance schemes and embodied reciprocity enacted by NBG. Embodied reciprocity creates relationality of people and nature. Equipped with these theoretical insights, I suggest practical applications in the context of NBG of Nature-based solutions, discussing three stylized models. These are the formation of urban multi-species communities in urban gardening and urban forests, the commoning of ecosystem services of animal populations in wildfire protection, and reconceptualizing eco-compensation as a reciprocal ritual of gift-giving.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"4 ","pages":"66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.17206.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional approach to environmental governance, based on institutions, regulations, and interventions, has failed to stop the current ecological catastrophe. I suggest a radical alternative: Ritual as the core mode of 'nature-based governance' (NBG) that enacts deep and comprehensive reciprocity between people and nature. NBG grounds governance mechanisms in embodied more-than-human practices with normative force. I build on theories of embodiment to suggest a general concept of ritual that is inspired by but generalizes over Indigenous thought and is informed by East Asian ideas about ritual as the pivot of social order. Further, the embodiment framework recognises ritual as a kind of action humans and non-humans share as living beings. Therefore, rituals can be harnessed in workable governance mechanisms to create and sustain communities of multi-species cohabitation. I distinguish between two basic types of reciprocity corresponding to two types of governance: Disembodied reciprocity enacted by conventional human-only governance schemes and embodied reciprocity enacted by NBG. Embodied reciprocity creates relationality of people and nature. Equipped with these theoretical insights, I suggest practical applications in the context of NBG of Nature-based solutions, discussing three stylized models. These are the formation of urban multi-species communities in urban gardening and urban forests, the commoning of ecosystem services of animal populations in wildfire protection, and reconceptualizing eco-compensation as a reciprocal ritual of gift-giving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仪式是人与自然互惠的自然治理。
以制度、法规和干预为基础的传统环境治理方法未能阻止当前的生态灾难。我提出了一个激进的替代方案:以仪式作为 "基于自然的治理"(NBG)的核心模式,在人与自然之间建立深刻而全面的互惠关系。基于自然的治理 "将治理机制建立在具有规范力量的体现性超越人类的实践中。我以体现理论为基础,提出了仪式的一般概念,这一概念受到土著思想的启发,但又超越了土著思想,并借鉴了东亚关于仪式是社会秩序枢纽的思想。此外,体现框架承认仪式是人类和非人类作为生命体共同采取的一种行动。因此,在可行的治理机制中可以利用仪式来创建和维持多物种共存的社区。我将互惠分为两种基本类型,与两种治理类型相对应:由传统的纯人类治理方案实施的非实体互惠和由 NBG 实施的实体互惠。体现互惠创造了人与自然的关系。有了这些理论见解,我提出了基于自然的 NBG 解决方案在实践中的应用,并讨论了三种风格化的模式。这三种模式是:在城市园林和城市森林中形成城市多物种社区;在野火保护中共同利用动物种群的生态系统服务;以及将生态补偿重新概念化为互惠的赠送礼品仪式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Co-designing ab initio electronic structure methods on a RISC-V vector architecture. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Unveiling Maternal Health Dynamics from Pregnancy Through Postpartum Perspectives. Antibiotics in honey: a comprehensive review on occurrence and analytical methodologies. Challenges to ethical public engagement in research funding: a perspective from practice. Environmental impacts of drugs against parasitic vector-borne diseases and the need to integrate sustainability into their development and use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1