A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-09-19 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000769
Kathryn E Bakkum, Kathy H Stoner, David A Gannon, Thomas B Mike, Prabi Rajbhandari
{"title":"A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use.","authors":"Kathryn E Bakkum, Kathy H Stoner, David A Gannon, Thomas B Mike, Prabi Rajbhandari","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inflammatory markers (IMs) are often ordered in multiples, even though evidence suggests that this does not add any clinical benefit. The project aimed to reduce the number of duplicate IMs for patients by 10% in 12 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We implemented a quality improvement (QI) project at our hospital, focusing on patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service. The team chose the model for improvement as the QI methodology. Key interventions included ongoing provider education, integrating the project into the physician incentive plan, and reviewing disease-specific pathways. The primary outcome measure was \"duplicate IM use,\" which was defined as any two or more IMs (procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate) obtained on the same patient within 24 hours. The secondary outcome measure was any IM use during their stay, and the balancing measures were average complete blood count use, hospital length of stay, and 7-day readmission rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline duplicate IM use, and any IM use was 43% and 19%, respectively. After the start of this QI project, duplicate IM use decreased to 12%, and the use of any IM also decreased to 12%. Complete blood count use varied from 11% to 24% during the project without obvious correlation to IM use. Hospital length of stay decreased from 2.5 to 2.6 days, and the 7-day readmission rate remained at 2.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The duplicate IM use and IM use were decreased without a concurrent increase in the balancing measures, indicating that a safe reduction of IM testing is feasible in inpatient pediatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory markers (IMs) are often ordered in multiples, even though evidence suggests that this does not add any clinical benefit. The project aimed to reduce the number of duplicate IMs for patients by 10% in 12 months.

Methods: We implemented a quality improvement (QI) project at our hospital, focusing on patients admitted to the pediatric hospital medicine service. The team chose the model for improvement as the QI methodology. Key interventions included ongoing provider education, integrating the project into the physician incentive plan, and reviewing disease-specific pathways. The primary outcome measure was "duplicate IM use," which was defined as any two or more IMs (procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate) obtained on the same patient within 24 hours. The secondary outcome measure was any IM use during their stay, and the balancing measures were average complete blood count use, hospital length of stay, and 7-day readmission rate.

Results: The baseline duplicate IM use, and any IM use was 43% and 19%, respectively. After the start of this QI project, duplicate IM use decreased to 12%, and the use of any IM also decreased to 12%. Complete blood count use varied from 11% to 24% during the project without obvious correlation to IM use. Hospital length of stay decreased from 2.5 to 2.6 days, and the 7-day readmission rate remained at 2.8%.

Conclusions: The duplicate IM use and IM use were decreased without a concurrent increase in the balancing measures, indicating that a safe reduction of IM testing is feasible in inpatient pediatric care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少重复使用炎症标记物的质量改进计划。
导言:炎症标记物(IMs)经常被重复订购,尽管有证据表明这不会增加任何临床益处。该项目旨在 12 个月内将患者的重复 IM 数量减少 10%:我们在医院实施了一项质量改进(QI)项目,重点关注儿科医院内科的住院病人。团队选择了改进模式作为 QI 方法。主要干预措施包括持续开展医疗服务提供者教育、将该项目纳入医生激励计划以及审查特定疾病路径。主要结果指标是 "重复使用 IM",即在 24 小时内对同一患者进行两次或两次以上的 IM(降钙素原、C 反应蛋白或红细胞沉降率)检查。次要结果指标是住院期间使用的任何 IM,平衡指标是平均全血细胞计数使用率、住院时间和 7 天再入院率:基线重复使用 IM 和使用任何 IM 的比例分别为 43% 和 19%。该 QI 项目启动后,重复使用 IM 的比例降至 12%,使用任何 IM 的比例也降至 12%。在该项目实施期间,全血细胞计数的使用率从 11% 到 24% 不等,与 IM 的使用没有明显关联。住院时间从 2.5 天减少到 2.6 天,7 天再入院率保持在 2.8%:结论:重复使用 IM 和使用 IM 的情况有所减少,但平衡措施并未同时增加,这表明在儿科住院治疗中安全减少 IM 检测是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use. How Super Is Supertrack? Expediting Care of Fast-track Patients through a Pediatric Emergency Department. Integrating Emotional Health Assessments into Pediatric Care: Initial Learnings from an MOC Part 4 Activity. Focused Team Engagements to Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration and Safety Behaviors among Novice Nurses and Medical Residents. Sustainability of a PICU Situation Awareness Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1