Structural Modeling of Early Ambulation Progression in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Covariance Structure Analysis Approach.

Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20240030
Jun Nakayama
{"title":"Structural Modeling of Early Ambulation Progression in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Covariance Structure Analysis Approach.","authors":"Jun Nakayama","doi":"10.2490/prm.20240030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to elucidate the causal relationships between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items and consciousness levels in patients with stroke and low consciousness levels 2 weeks after initiating occupational therapy (OT). This modeling sought to identify the factors influencing the number of days required to get out of bed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SEM was used for multifactorial simultaneous analysis in a study of 22 patients with a Japan Coma Scale score of 20 after stroke. The Glasgow Coma Scale was used to evaluate patients' consciousness level; FIMs were used to evaluate activities of daily living in the ward. Influencing factors, including \"bed/chair transfers\" and \"toilet transfers,\" were defined as \"transfer functions,\" while factors involving \"social interactions,\" \"comprehension,\" \"memory,\" \"problem solving,\" and \"expression\" were defined as \"cognitive decline.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 2 weeks, standardized coefficients showed that \"transfer functions\" and \"cognitive decline\" had effects of -0.33 and -0.25, respectively, on \"early ambulation days.\" Further analysis revealed that improvements in \"consciousness level\" impacted \"early ambulation days,\" with coefficients of -0.35 for \"transfer functions\" and 0.14 for \"cognitive decline.\" Through the \"consciousness level\" observation variable, the coefficients of indirect effects were -0.27 for \"transfer function\" on \"days to get out of bed,\" 0.38 for \"cognitive decline,\" and -0.06 for \"self-care\" on \"early ambulation days.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improvement in transfer movements and cognitive decline influenced the number of days required to get out of bed without improving consciousness or affecting early ambulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"9 ","pages":"20240030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study used structural equation modeling (SEM) to elucidate the causal relationships between Functional Independence Measure (FIM) items and consciousness levels in patients with stroke and low consciousness levels 2 weeks after initiating occupational therapy (OT). This modeling sought to identify the factors influencing the number of days required to get out of bed.

Methods: SEM was used for multifactorial simultaneous analysis in a study of 22 patients with a Japan Coma Scale score of 20 after stroke. The Glasgow Coma Scale was used to evaluate patients' consciousness level; FIMs were used to evaluate activities of daily living in the ward. Influencing factors, including "bed/chair transfers" and "toilet transfers," were defined as "transfer functions," while factors involving "social interactions," "comprehension," "memory," "problem solving," and "expression" were defined as "cognitive decline."

Results: After 2 weeks, standardized coefficients showed that "transfer functions" and "cognitive decline" had effects of -0.33 and -0.25, respectively, on "early ambulation days." Further analysis revealed that improvements in "consciousness level" impacted "early ambulation days," with coefficients of -0.35 for "transfer functions" and 0.14 for "cognitive decline." Through the "consciousness level" observation variable, the coefficients of indirect effects were -0.27 for "transfer function" on "days to get out of bed," 0.38 for "cognitive decline," and -0.06 for "self-care" on "early ambulation days."

Conclusions: Improvement in transfer movements and cognitive decline influenced the number of days required to get out of bed without improving consciousness or affecting early ambulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性脑卒中患者早期行走进展的结构模型:协方差结构分析法
研究目的:本研究使用结构方程建模(SEM)来阐明脑卒中患者功能独立性测量(FIM)项目与意识水平之间的因果关系,以及开始职业治疗(OT)2周后意识水平低下的原因。该模型旨在确定影响下床活动所需天数的因素:在一项针对 22 名中风后日本昏迷量表评分为 20 分的患者的研究中,使用了 SEM 进行多因素同步分析。格拉斯哥昏迷量表用于评估患者的意识水平;FIMs 用于评估患者在病房中的日常生活活动。包括 "床/椅转移 "和 "如厕转移 "在内的影响因素被定义为 "转移功能",而涉及 "社会交往"、"理解"、"记忆"、"问题解决 "和 "表达 "的因素被定义为 "认知能力下降":两周后,标准化系数显示,"转移功能 "和 "认知能力下降 "对 "早期行走天数 "的影响分别为-0.33和-0.25。进一步分析表明,"意识水平 "的改善对 "早期行走天数 "有影响,"转移功能 "和 "认知能力下降 "的系数分别为-0.35和0.14。通过 "意识水平 "观察变量,"转移功能 "对 "下床活动天数 "的间接影响系数为-0.27,对 "认知能力下降 "的间接影响系数为0.38,而 "自我护理 "对 "早期下床活动天数 "的间接影响系数为-0.06。"结论:转移动作和认知能力下降的改善会影响下床活动所需的天数,但不会改善意识或影响早期下床活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Delayed Postoperative Rehabilitation on Patients with Valvular Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study. The Relationship between Physical Function and Quality of Life in Elderly People Requiring Long-term Care. Preoperative Posterior Pelvic Tilt Angle is Associated with Decreased Gait Speed and Hip Function in Older Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis. Refractory Severe Anti-SRP Myopathy that Improved with Long-term Rehabilitation Therapy: A Case Report. Therapeutic Intervention for Trunk Control Impairments in Central Nervous System Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of Methods and Efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1