Pharmacoeconomic implications of preference toward reference- versus generic-brand antidepressants in primary care.

Onur Gultekin, Volkan Aydin, Dilara Bayram, Omer Atac, Ahmet Akici
{"title":"Pharmacoeconomic implications of preference toward reference- versus generic-brand antidepressants in primary care.","authors":"Onur Gultekin, Volkan Aydin, Dilara Bayram, Omer Atac, Ahmet Akici","doi":"10.1017/S1463423624000276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of depression is gradually increasing worldwide with an increasing utilization of antidepressants. Nevertheless, despite their lower costs, generic-brand antidepressants were reported to be less prescribed. We aimed to examine the costs of reference- versus generic-brand antidepressant prescriptions in primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included electronic prescriptions for adult patients that contained antidepressants (World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code: N06A), which were generated by a systematically selected sample of primary care doctors (<i>n</i> = 1431) in Istanbul in 2016. We examined the drug groups preferred, the reference- versus generic-brand status, and pharmacotherapy costs.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The majority of the prescriptions were prescribed for women (71.8%), and the average age of the patients was 53.6 ± 16.2 years. In prescriptions with a depression-related indication (<i>n</i> = 40 497), the mean number and cost of drugs were 1.5 ± 1.0 and 22.7 ± 26.4 United States Dollar ($) per prescription, respectively. In these prescriptions, the mean number and cost of antidepressants per encounter were 1.1 ± 0.2 and $17.0 ± 13.2, respectively. Reference-brand antidepressants were preferred in 58.2% of depression-related prescriptions, where the mean cost per prescription was $18.3 ± 12.4. The mean cost per prescription of the generics, which constituted 41.8% of the antidepressants in prescriptions, was $15.1 ± 11.4. We found that if the generic version with the lowest cost was prescribed instead of the reference-brand, the mean cost per prescription would be $12.9 ± 11.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlighted the substantial pharmacoeconomic impact of generic-brand antidepressant prescribing, whose preference over reference-brands could reduce the cost of antidepressant medication treatment by 17.5% in primary care, which could be approximately doubled if the cheapest generic antidepressant had been prescribed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"25 ","pages":"e40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423624000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of depression is gradually increasing worldwide with an increasing utilization of antidepressants. Nevertheless, despite their lower costs, generic-brand antidepressants were reported to be less prescribed. We aimed to examine the costs of reference- versus generic-brand antidepressant prescriptions in primary care practice.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included electronic prescriptions for adult patients that contained antidepressants (World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code: N06A), which were generated by a systematically selected sample of primary care doctors (n = 1431) in Istanbul in 2016. We examined the drug groups preferred, the reference- versus generic-brand status, and pharmacotherapy costs.

Findings: The majority of the prescriptions were prescribed for women (71.8%), and the average age of the patients was 53.6 ± 16.2 years. In prescriptions with a depression-related indication (n = 40 497), the mean number and cost of drugs were 1.5 ± 1.0 and 22.7 ± 26.4 United States Dollar ($) per prescription, respectively. In these prescriptions, the mean number and cost of antidepressants per encounter were 1.1 ± 0.2 and $17.0 ± 13.2, respectively. Reference-brand antidepressants were preferred in 58.2% of depression-related prescriptions, where the mean cost per prescription was $18.3 ± 12.4. The mean cost per prescription of the generics, which constituted 41.8% of the antidepressants in prescriptions, was $15.1 ± 11.4. We found that if the generic version with the lowest cost was prescribed instead of the reference-brand, the mean cost per prescription would be $12.9 ± 11.2.

Conclusions: Our study highlighted the substantial pharmacoeconomic impact of generic-brand antidepressant prescribing, whose preference over reference-brands could reduce the cost of antidepressant medication treatment by 17.5% in primary care, which could be approximately doubled if the cheapest generic antidepressant had been prescribed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健中偏好参考品牌与非专利品牌抗抑郁药的药物经济学影响。
背景:随着抗抑郁药物使用量的增加,抑郁症的发病率在全球范围内逐渐上升。然而,尽管通用品牌抗抑郁药的成本较低,但据报道其处方量却较少。我们旨在研究初级保健实践中参考品牌与普通品牌抗抑郁药处方的成本:这项横断面研究纳入了成人患者含有抗抑郁药(世界卫生组织的解剖治疗化学(ATC)代码:N06A)的电子处方:N06A)的成人患者的电子处方,这些处方由伊斯坦布尔 2016 年系统选取的初级保健医生样本(n = 1431)生成。我们研究了首选药物组别、参考品牌与仿制品牌状态以及药物治疗成本:大部分处方是开给女性的(71.8%),患者的平均年龄为 53.6 ± 16.2 岁。在与抑郁症相关的处方(n = 40 497)中,每张处方的平均药物数量和费用分别为(1.5 ± 1.0)和(22.7 ± 26.4)美元。在这些处方中,每次使用抗抑郁药的平均数量和费用分别为 1.1 ± 0.2 和 17.0 ± 13.2 美元。58.2%的抑郁症相关处方首选参考品牌抗抑郁药,每张处方的平均费用为(18.3 ± 12.4)美元。仿制药占抗抑郁药处方的 41.8%,每张处方的平均成本为 15.1 美元±11.4 美元。我们发现,如果处方中使用的是成本最低的非专利药而不是参考品牌药,则每张处方的平均成本为(12.9 ± 11.2)美元:我们的研究强调了处方非专利抗抑郁药对药物经济学的重大影响,在初级医疗机构中,处方非专利抗抑郁药比处方参考品牌抗抑郁药可降低 17.5%的抗抑郁药物治疗成本,如果处方最便宜的非专利抗抑郁药,则可降低约一倍的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of primary care among medical students in Lima, Peru: a cross-sectional study in two universities. Self-management interventions in primary care practices in France between 2010 and 2022: a descriptive national study. Life satisfaction and subjective well-being in urban slums of Gorakhpur, India: psychometric validation of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) and socio-demographic assessment. Person-centred, community-oriented, and diversity sensitive primary care for migrants; a EFPC position paper. Adverse childhood experiences and burnout among health care providers in primary care: the moderating role of resilience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1