An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/5717748
Lennert Goossens, Greet Cardon, Erik Witvrouw, Evert A L M Verhagen, Dirk De Clercq
{"title":"An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.","authors":"Lennert Goossens, Greet Cardon, Erik Witvrouw, Evert A L M Verhagen, Dirk De Clercq","doi":"10.1155/2024/5717748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an injury prevention programme for Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) students, consisting of an injury awareness module and implementing prevention strategies during intracurricular lessons. Participants from four PETE programmes formed the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 4 programme directors, <i>n</i> = 38 sports lecturers, <i>n</i> = 859 students), while those from four other programmes were the controls (<i>n</i> = 4 programme directors, <i>n</i> = 34 sports lecturers, <i>n</i> = 721 students). Programme directors and sports lecturers received a three-hour workshop on sports injury prevention. The feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention were evaluated following the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix. Reach, adoption, and implementation of the prevention strategies were high, but implementation of the awareness module was moderate, ranging from 25% to 75%. Maintenance in terms of intentions ranged from 25% to 75% for aspects of the awareness module and averaged 68% for the prevention strategies. Significantly more static stretching (<i>p</i>=0.029), dynamic stabilisation (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and core stability (<i>p</i>=0.001) were implemented in the intervention group compared to the control group. Injury prevention behaviour and knowledge in students did not increase after the intervention. In conclusion, moderate feasibility of an injury prevention intervention for PETE students was found. Sports lecturers implemented prevention strategies in their lessons frequently, but future interventions should develop more dissemination initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5717748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an injury prevention programme for Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) students, consisting of an injury awareness module and implementing prevention strategies during intracurricular lessons. Participants from four PETE programmes formed the intervention group (n = 4 programme directors, n = 38 sports lecturers, n = 859 students), while those from four other programmes were the controls (n = 4 programme directors, n = 34 sports lecturers, n = 721 students). Programme directors and sports lecturers received a three-hour workshop on sports injury prevention. The feasibility and effectiveness of the intervention were evaluated following the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix. Reach, adoption, and implementation of the prevention strategies were high, but implementation of the awareness module was moderate, ranging from 25% to 75%. Maintenance in terms of intentions ranged from 25% to 75% for aspects of the awareness module and averaged 68% for the prevention strategies. Significantly more static stretching (p=0.029), dynamic stabilisation (p < 0.001), and core stability (p=0.001) were implemented in the intervention group compared to the control group. Injury prevention behaviour and knowledge in students did not increase after the intervention. In conclusion, moderate feasibility of an injury prevention intervention for PETE students was found. Sports lecturers implemented prevention strategies in their lessons frequently, but future interventions should develop more dissemination initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育师范生伤害预防计划:使用 RE-AIM 运动环境矩阵进行过程评估。
本研究旨在评估针对体育教师教育(PETE)学生的伤害预防计划的可行性和有效性,该计划包括伤害意识模块和在课内课程中实施预防策略。来自四个体育教师教育课程的参与者组成干预组(n = 4 名课程主任,n = 38 名体育讲师,n = 859 名学生),而来自其他四个课程的参与者为对照组(n = 4 名课程主任,n = 34 名体育讲师,n = 721 名学生)。课程主任和体育讲师都参加了三小时的运动损伤预防研讨会。根据 RE-AIM 运动环境矩阵对干预措施的可行性和有效性进行了评估。预防策略的覆盖率、采纳率和实施率都很高,但宣传模块的实施率一般,从 25% 到 75% 不等。就意向维持而言,认知模块的意向维持率从 25% 到 75% 不等,而预防策略的意向维持率平均为 68%。与对照组相比,干预组实施的静态拉伸(p=0.029)、动态稳定(p < 0.001)和核心稳定(p=0.001)的次数明显增多。干预后,学生的伤害预防行为和知识并未增加。总之,针对 PETE 学生的伤害预防干预具有一定的可行性。体育讲师经常在他们的课程中实施预防策略,但未来的干预措施应制定更多的传播举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques. Effect of 1-Week Weight Loss While Maintaining Total Body Water on Jump Performance. Lower Extremity Asymmetry Values Derived From Multiple Strength Testing Modes Are Associated With Perceived Functional Capabilities Among University Athletes. Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives. An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1