An Imaging-Based Assay to Measure the Location of PD-1 at the Immune Synapse for Testing the Binding Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies.

IF 1 Q3 BIOLOGY Bio-protocol Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.21769/BioProtoc.5057
Justin C Zhong, Shalom Lerrer, Adam Mor
{"title":"An Imaging-Based Assay to Measure the Location of PD-1 at the Immune Synapse for Testing the Binding Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies.","authors":"Justin C Zhong, Shalom Lerrer, Adam Mor","doi":"10.21769/BioProtoc.5057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PD-1 is an immune checkpoint on T cells. Antibodies to PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 are gaining popularity as a leading immunotherapy approach. In the US, 40% of all cancer patients will be treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies but, unfortunately, only 30% will respond, and many will develop immune-related adverse events. There are nine FDA-approved anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and approximately 100 are in different stages of clinical development. It is a clinical challenge to choose the correct antibody for a given patient, and this is critical in advanced malignancies, which often do not permit a second-line intervention. To resolve that, an in vitro assay to compare the performance of the different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies is not only a critical tool for research purposes but also a possible tool for personalized medicine. There are some assays describing the binding affinity and function of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. However, a significant limitation of existing assays is that they need to consider the location of PD-1 in the immune synapse, the interface between the T cell and tumor cells, and, therefore, ignore a critical component in its biology. To address this, we developed and validated an imaging-based assay to quantify and compare the ability of different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies to remove PD-1 from the immune synapse. We correlated that with the same antibodies' ability to increase cytokine secretion from the targeted cells. The strong correlation between PD-1 location and its function in vitro and in vivo within the antibody treatment setting validates this assay's usability, which is easily recordable and straightforward. Key features • Live-cell imaging quantifies and compares how anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies disrupt PD-1 localization, causing the removal of PD-1 during immune synapse formation. • Hao et al. [1] validated the protocol, and the findings were extended to a live confocal microscopy method. • It requires a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope and appropriate imaging software and is optimized for the latest version of Zen Blue. • Anti-PD-1 antibodies are commonly used in cancer therapies, and this protocol optimizes the analysis of their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":93907,"journal":{"name":"Bio-protocol","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11393042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bio-protocol","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.5057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PD-1 is an immune checkpoint on T cells. Antibodies to PD-1 or its ligand PD-L1 are gaining popularity as a leading immunotherapy approach. In the US, 40% of all cancer patients will be treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies but, unfortunately, only 30% will respond, and many will develop immune-related adverse events. There are nine FDA-approved anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, and approximately 100 are in different stages of clinical development. It is a clinical challenge to choose the correct antibody for a given patient, and this is critical in advanced malignancies, which often do not permit a second-line intervention. To resolve that, an in vitro assay to compare the performance of the different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies is not only a critical tool for research purposes but also a possible tool for personalized medicine. There are some assays describing the binding affinity and function of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. However, a significant limitation of existing assays is that they need to consider the location of PD-1 in the immune synapse, the interface between the T cell and tumor cells, and, therefore, ignore a critical component in its biology. To address this, we developed and validated an imaging-based assay to quantify and compare the ability of different anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies to remove PD-1 from the immune synapse. We correlated that with the same antibodies' ability to increase cytokine secretion from the targeted cells. The strong correlation between PD-1 location and its function in vitro and in vivo within the antibody treatment setting validates this assay's usability, which is easily recordable and straightforward. Key features • Live-cell imaging quantifies and compares how anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 antibodies disrupt PD-1 localization, causing the removal of PD-1 during immune synapse formation. • Hao et al. [1] validated the protocol, and the findings were extended to a live confocal microscopy method. • It requires a Zeiss LSM 900 confocal microscope and appropriate imaging software and is optimized for the latest version of Zen Blue. • Anti-PD-1 antibodies are commonly used in cancer therapies, and this protocol optimizes the analysis of their effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种基于成像的检测方法,用于测量 PD-1 在免疫突触中的位置,以测试抗 PD-1 和抗 PD-L1 抗体的结合效力。
PD-1 是 T 细胞上的一个免疫检查点。PD-1或其配体PD-L1的抗体作为一种主要的免疫疗法正日益受到欢迎。在美国,40% 的癌症患者将接受抗 PD-1 或抗 PD-L1 抗体治疗,但不幸的是,只有 30% 的患者会产生反应,许多患者会出现免疫相关不良反应。目前已有九种抗 PD-1/PD-L1 抗体获得 FDA 批准,约有 100 种处于不同的临床开发阶段。为特定患者选择正确的抗体是一项临床挑战,这对晚期恶性肿瘤至关重要,因为这种疾病通常不允许二线干预。为了解决这个问题,比较不同抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体性能的体外试验不仅是研究的重要工具,也是个性化医疗的可能工具。有一些检测方法描述了抗PD-1/PD-L1抗体的结合亲和力和功能。然而,现有检测方法的一个重大局限是,它们需要考虑 PD-1 在免疫突触(T 细胞与肿瘤细胞之间的界面)中的位置,因此忽略了其生物学中的一个关键组成部分。为了解决这个问题,我们开发并验证了一种基于成像的检测方法,用于量化和比较不同的抗 PD-1/PD-L1 抗体从免疫突触中清除 PD-1 的能力。我们将其与相同抗体增加靶细胞细胞因子分泌的能力联系起来。在抗体治疗环境中,PD-1 的位置与其体外和体内功能之间的强相关性验证了该检测方法的可用性,它易于记录且简单明了。主要特点--活细胞成像量化并比较了抗 PD-1 和抗 PD-L1 抗体如何破坏 PD-1 定位,导致 PD-1 在免疫突触形成过程中被清除。- 郝等人[1]验证了这一方案,并将研究结果扩展到活体共聚焦显微镜方法。- 该方法需要蔡司 LSM 900 共聚焦显微镜和适当的成像软件,并针对最新版本的 Zen Blue 进行了优化。- 抗 PD-1 抗体常用于癌症疗法,该方案优化了对其有效性的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Automated pre-Dilution Setup for Von Willebrand Factor Activity Assays. An Imaging-Based Assay to Measure the Location of PD-1 at the Immune Synapse for Testing the Binding Efficacy of Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies. Endothelin-1-Induced Persistent Ischemia in a Chicken Embryo Model. Evaluating Mechanisms of Soil Microbiome Suppression of Striga Infection in Sorghum. Laser-Assisted Microdissection and High-Throughput RNA Sequencing of the Arabidopsis Gynoecium Medial and Lateral Domains.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1