Multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD): Did we throw the baby out with the bathwater too fast? A systematic review.

Valerio Zaccaria, Ignazio Ardizzone, Francesco Pisani, Andrea Raballo, Michele Poletti
{"title":"Multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD): Did we throw the baby out with the bathwater too fast? A systematic review.","authors":"Valerio Zaccaria, Ignazio Ardizzone, Francesco Pisani, Andrea Raballo, Michele Poletti","doi":"10.1177/13591045241285486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD) manifests as early-onset impairment across different domains. Although it could appear as a transitional condition between autism and childhood-onset schizophrenia, interest in MCDD has progressively waned. This study attempts to discern MCDD current relevance to avoid \"throwing the baby out with the bathwater\" too fast.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All available studies published up to January 2024 were retrieved and evaluated following on the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews using the term \"multiple complex developmental disorder\" or \"MCDD\", without any filter for study design nor year of publication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 16 studies were included and analyzed. Overall, a variable heterogeneity was observed in terms of country of investigation, study design, and clinical groups. Most of the included studies explored the construct of MCDD in developmental age, comparing MCDD mostly with autistic patients, and observing how the former group had higher levels of paranoia, illusions, and psychotic thoughts, whereas the latter showed more frequently difficulties in social interactions and stereotypical behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these results showed how progressive changes in diagnostic criteria over time led MCDD to be abandoned as nosographic construct, leaving perhaps a diagnostic void between autism and psychotic disorders that needs to be further studied. A systematic review on the Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder (MCDD): a forgotten diagnosis between autism and schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":93938,"journal":{"name":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical child psychology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045241285486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple complex developmental disorder (MCDD) manifests as early-onset impairment across different domains. Although it could appear as a transitional condition between autism and childhood-onset schizophrenia, interest in MCDD has progressively waned. This study attempts to discern MCDD current relevance to avoid "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" too fast.

Methods: All available studies published up to January 2024 were retrieved and evaluated following on the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews using the term "multiple complex developmental disorder" or "MCDD", without any filter for study design nor year of publication.

Results: Only 16 studies were included and analyzed. Overall, a variable heterogeneity was observed in terms of country of investigation, study design, and clinical groups. Most of the included studies explored the construct of MCDD in developmental age, comparing MCDD mostly with autistic patients, and observing how the former group had higher levels of paranoia, illusions, and psychotic thoughts, whereas the latter showed more frequently difficulties in social interactions and stereotypical behaviors.

Conclusion: Overall, these results showed how progressive changes in diagnostic criteria over time led MCDD to be abandoned as nosographic construct, leaving perhaps a diagnostic void between autism and psychotic disorders that needs to be further studied. A systematic review on the Multiple Complex Developmental Disorder (MCDD): a forgotten diagnosis between autism and schizophrenia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多重复杂发育障碍(MCDD):我们是否太快将婴儿与洗澡水一起倒掉?系统回顾。
背景:多重复杂发育障碍(MCDD)表现为早期出现的不同领域的障碍。虽然它可能是自闭症和儿童期精神分裂症之间的一种过渡性疾病,但人们对 MCDD 的兴趣已逐渐减弱。本研究试图揭示 MCDD 目前的相关性,以避免 "操之过急":方法:按照系统综述的 PRISMA 指南,使用 "多重复杂发育障碍 "或 "MCDD "一词,检索并评估了截至 2024 年 1 月发表的所有可用研究,未对研究设计或发表年份进行任何过滤:结果:仅纳入并分析了 16 项研究。总体而言,在调查国家、研究设计和临床组别方面存在不同的异质性。所纳入的大多数研究都探讨了发育年龄阶段的精神发育迟滞症,将精神发育迟滞症患者与自闭症患者进行了比较,观察到前者有更高程度的偏执、幻想和精神病性思维,而后者则更多地表现出社会交往困难和刻板行为:总之,这些研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,诊断标准的逐步变化导致多重发展障碍作为一种命名结构而被放弃,这或许在自闭症和精神病之间留下了一个诊断空白,需要进一步研究。关于多重复杂发育障碍(MCDD)的系统综述:自闭症与精神分裂症之间被遗忘的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The association of personal, parental, school and community factors with depressive symptoms among a sample of Colombian students of ages 9 to 12 years. Letter to the editor: Eating disorder symptoms among transgender and gender diverse youth seeking gender-affirming care. Response to a letter to the editor about eating disorder (ED) symptoms among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking gender-affirming care. Assessment of anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents: Italian validation of the short version of the spence children's anxiety scale for parents. The healthy habits questionnaire (HHQ): Validation of a measure designed to assess problematic influential behaviours amongst families of children living with obesity or a risk of developing obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1