The association between socio-economic deprivation and receipt of long-acting reversible contraception at a single clinic visit

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705
Mary D. Carmody , Danielle G. Tsevat , Lindsey Yates , Gretchen Stuart , Kavita S. Arora
{"title":"The association between socio-economic deprivation and receipt of long-acting reversible contraception at a single clinic visit","authors":"Mary D. Carmody ,&nbsp;Danielle G. Tsevat ,&nbsp;Lindsey Yates ,&nbsp;Gretchen Stuart ,&nbsp;Kavita S. Arora","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the relationship between area deprivation index (ADI) and obtaining single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We utilized Poisson regression to determine the association between area deprivation and single-visit LARC insertion within a state-wide healthcare system between 2019–2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among our cohort (<em>N</em> = 4417), 68.60% of patients desiring LARC obtained single-visit LARC. Participants living in high deprivation areas were less likely to receive single-visit LARC (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Living in areas of high deprivation is independently negatively associated with obtaining a single-visit LARC.</div></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><div>While access to single-visit LARC should be universally improved, reducing barriers for patientswith a higher ADI may help limit inequities in reproductive healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 110705"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424004050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the relationship between area deprivation index (ADI) and obtaining single-visit long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

Study design

We utilized Poisson regression to determine the association between area deprivation and single-visit LARC insertion within a state-wide healthcare system between 2019–2021.

Results

Among our cohort (N = 4417), 68.60% of patients desiring LARC obtained single-visit LARC. Participants living in high deprivation areas were less likely to receive single-visit LARC (aRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.80).

Conclusions

Living in areas of high deprivation is independently negatively associated with obtaining a single-visit LARC.

Implications

While access to single-visit LARC should be universally improved, reducing barriers for patientswith a higher ADI may help limit inequities in reproductive healthcare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济贫困与单次门诊接受长效可逆避孕药具之间的关系。
研究目的:确定居住在高度贫困地区与获得单次长效可逆避孕药具之间的关系:研究设计:研究设计:我们利用泊松回归法确定了2019-2021年间全州医疗保健系统中地区贫困与单次就诊LARC植入之间的关系:在我们的队列(N=4,417)中,68.60%需要LARC的患者获得了单次LARC,23.70%生活在高贫困地区。生活在高贫困地区的参与者接受单次LARC的可能性较低(aRR为0.72,95% CI为0.65-0.80):结论:需要减少社会经济贫困地区患者获得理想医疗服务的障碍,以减少生殖医疗服务中的不公平现象:虽然应普遍改善单次就诊 LARC 的可及性,但仍需注意减少为 ADI 较高的患者提供护理的临床机构的障碍,并最终帮助限制生殖保健方面的进一步不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Use of period- or fertility-tracking technologies pre- and post-Dobbs Mapping ethical concerns in algorithm-driven period and fertility tracking technologies Implementing digital sexual and reproductive health tools: Challenges and recommendations post-Dobbs Navigating FemTech app regulation in Switzerland: Challenges and opportunities from a public health perspective Safeguarding autonomy: Examining the complexities and implications of under-regulated period-tracking apps and paired devices in a post-Roe landscape
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1