Effect of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula Optimization in the Sum-of-Segments Optical Biometer.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-09-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S477006
Takashi Kojima, Akeno Tamaoki, Kazuo Ichikawa, Yuya Satoh, Ryota Tomemori, Keizo Watanabe, Asato Hasegawa, Ayako Sawaki, Tatsushi Kaga
{"title":"Effect of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formula Optimization in the Sum-of-Segments Optical Biometer.","authors":"Takashi Kojima, Akeno Tamaoki, Kazuo Ichikawa, Yuya Satoh, Ryota Tomemori, Keizo Watanabe, Asato Hasegawa, Ayako Sawaki, Tatsushi Kaga","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S477006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We evaluated the effect of optimization of the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula SRK/T and Barrett Universal II (BU II) in long eyes (≥26 mm: group L) and short eyes (≤22 mm: group S) using axial length calculated from segmented refractive indices (SRI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter study at five sites in Japan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 461 eyes of 461 patients (mean age 73.8 ± 8.4 years) who underwent cataract surgery. The predicted refractive error (PRE) was compared between the SRI (ARGOS) and the equivalent refractive index (ERI) biometers (IOLMaster<sup>TM</sup>700). The patients were randomly divided into two groups, a learning group and a validation group. The optimization constants were determined in the learning group, and the optimization constants were subsequently applied to the validation group and compared with the ERI biometer results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using both SRK/T and BU II, the validation group's PRE using optimization constants for the SRI biometer in group L was significantly smaller than that using the ERI biometer (p<0.001, p<0.01). In group L, the arithmetic PRE of Barrett UII formula with SRI showed a significant improvement after optimization compared to before optimization (p<0.0001). In group S, the arithmetic PRE of SRK/T and Barrett UII formula with SRI showed a significant improvement (p<0.0001, p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In long and short eyes, the current study revealed that optimization of the SRK/T and Barrett formula constants for the SRI biometer was beneficial to achieve accurate refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11385930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S477006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated the effect of optimization of the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula SRK/T and Barrett Universal II (BU II) in long eyes (≥26 mm: group L) and short eyes (≤22 mm: group S) using axial length calculated from segmented refractive indices (SRI).

Setting: Multicenter study at five sites in Japan.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Methods: This study included 461 eyes of 461 patients (mean age 73.8 ± 8.4 years) who underwent cataract surgery. The predicted refractive error (PRE) was compared between the SRI (ARGOS) and the equivalent refractive index (ERI) biometers (IOLMasterTM700). The patients were randomly divided into two groups, a learning group and a validation group. The optimization constants were determined in the learning group, and the optimization constants were subsequently applied to the validation group and compared with the ERI biometer results.

Results: Using both SRK/T and BU II, the validation group's PRE using optimization constants for the SRI biometer in group L was significantly smaller than that using the ERI biometer (p<0.001, p<0.01). In group L, the arithmetic PRE of Barrett UII formula with SRI showed a significant improvement after optimization compared to before optimization (p<0.0001). In group S, the arithmetic PRE of SRK/T and Barrett UII formula with SRI showed a significant improvement (p<0.0001, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: In long and short eyes, the current study revealed that optimization of the SRK/T and Barrett formula constants for the SRI biometer was beneficial to achieve accurate refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内透镜功率计算公式优化对分段总和光学生物测量仪的影响。
目的:我们评估了长眼(≥26 mm:L 组)和短眼(≤22 mm:S 组)使用分段屈光指数(SRI)计算的轴长优化眼内晶状体(IOL)功率计算公式 SRK/T 和 Barrett Universal II(BU II)的效果:在日本五个地点进行的多中心研究:设计:回顾性观察研究:这项研究包括 461 名接受白内障手术的患者(平均年龄为 73.8 ± 8.4 岁)的 461 只眼睛。比较了 SRI(ARGOS)和等效屈光度(ERI)生物测量仪(IOLMasterTM700)的预测屈光不正(PRE)。患者被随机分为两组,即学习组和验证组。在学习组中确定优化常数,然后将优化常数应用于验证组,并与 ERI 生物测量计的结果进行比较:结果:在使用 SRK/T 和 BU II 时,验证组使用 SRI 生物测量计优化常数的 L 组 PRE 明显小于使用 ERI 生物测量计的 L 组 PRE(p 结论:对于长眼和短眼,目前的研究表明,优化 SRI 屈光度计的 SRK/T 和 Barrett 公式常数有利于在白内障手术后获得准确的屈光结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ocular Surface Disease and Dry Eye Severity in Glaucoma Patients at Urban Private Eye Care Centres in Malaysia. Association Between Particulate Matter Pollutants and Ophthalmology Visits for Ocular Surface Irritation and Allergy. The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract. Comparison of Large Language Models in Diagnosis and Management of Challenging Clinical Cases. Enhancing OCT Reliability: The Role of Eye-Tracking in Achieving Consistent Retinal Measurements [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1