An instrument of screening criteria to assess individualized high-risk sexual behavior to be applied in the Brazilian population: translation and cross-cultural adaptation.

Miriane Lucindo Zucoloto, Guilherme Galdino, Edson Zangiacomi Martinez
{"title":"An instrument of screening criteria to assess individualized high-risk sexual behavior to be applied in the Brazilian population: translation and cross-cultural adaptation.","authors":"Miriane Lucindo Zucoloto, Guilherme Galdino, Edson Zangiacomi Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alternative approaches have been proposed to ensure a safe and equitable screening process for blood donation that treats all people equally, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. The terms 'neutral approach' and 'individualized risk assessment' have been used to describe this goal. To facilitate research and implementation of these concepts in blood donation contexts and health services in Brazil, we propose a Portuguese version of the 'for the assessment of individualized risk screening criteria' (FAIR) screening criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The FAIR screening criteria are 12 questions that assess sex, sexuality, ethnicity, and the extent to which participants engaged in each targeted sexual behavior. The aim of FAIR is to reduce error while increasing reliable and accurate reporting of sexual behaviors associated with both objective and subjective estimates of infection risk. The FAIR screening criteria were translated and cross-culturally adapted using a systematic approach with standardized procedures appropriate for adapting instruments that track behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A version that is appropriate for use with the Brazilian population was produced employing the following steps: expert translations, harmonization, consensus version, expert back-translation, revision, panel of experts, cognitive interviewing, and finalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Portuguese version of FAIR was proposed, and because of its straightforward, simple language and focus on specific and frequent behaviors in some populations, it has the potential to be used in a variety of contexts involving the screening of high-risk sexual behavior in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":94026,"journal":{"name":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.htct.2024.06.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alternative approaches have been proposed to ensure a safe and equitable screening process for blood donation that treats all people equally, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation. The terms 'neutral approach' and 'individualized risk assessment' have been used to describe this goal. To facilitate research and implementation of these concepts in blood donation contexts and health services in Brazil, we propose a Portuguese version of the 'for the assessment of individualized risk screening criteria' (FAIR) screening criteria.

Methods: The FAIR screening criteria are 12 questions that assess sex, sexuality, ethnicity, and the extent to which participants engaged in each targeted sexual behavior. The aim of FAIR is to reduce error while increasing reliable and accurate reporting of sexual behaviors associated with both objective and subjective estimates of infection risk. The FAIR screening criteria were translated and cross-culturally adapted using a systematic approach with standardized procedures appropriate for adapting instruments that track behaviors.

Results: A version that is appropriate for use with the Brazilian population was produced employing the following steps: expert translations, harmonization, consensus version, expert back-translation, revision, panel of experts, cognitive interviewing, and finalization.

Conclusion: The Portuguese version of FAIR was proposed, and because of its straightforward, simple language and focus on specific and frequent behaviors in some populations, it has the potential to be used in a variety of contexts involving the screening of high-risk sexual behavior in Brazil.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估巴西人口个性化高风险性行为的筛查标准工具:翻译和跨文化调整。
背景:为确保献血筛查过程安全、公平,不分性别认同或性取向,一视同仁,人们提出了一些替代方法。中性方法 "和 "个性化风险评估 "被用来描述这一目标。为了促进这些概念在巴西献血环境和医疗服务中的研究和实施,我们提出了葡萄牙语版的 "个性化风险筛查评估标准"(FAIR)筛查标准:FAIR 筛查标准由 12 个问题组成,对参与者的性别、性取向、种族以及参与每种目标性行为的程度进行评估。FAIR 的目的是减少误差,同时提高与客观和主观估计感染风险相关的性行为报告的可靠性和准确性。FAIR 筛选标准经过翻译和跨文化改编,采用了适合改编行为跟踪工具的标准化程序:结果:采用以下步骤制作了适合巴西人口使用的版本:专家翻译、协调、共识版本、专家回译、修订、专家小组、认知访谈和定稿:提出了 FAIR 的葡萄牙语版本,由于其语言简单明了,且侧重于某些人群中的特定和频繁行为,因此有可能用于巴西涉及高危性行为筛查的各种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Familial acute myeloid leukemia due to a novel germline CEBPA pathogenic variant - a case report. Hemolytic anemia due to pyruvate kinase deficiency coexistent with the alpha thalassemia trait and chronic myeloid leukemia. Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Case report. Minor surgical procedures during immune tolerance induction in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors: results from the Brazilian Immune Tolerance (BrazIT) study cohort. Psychological aspects in young people with venous thromboembolic disease, preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1