Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications.

Tom Melvin, Marc M Dooms, Berthold Koletzko, Mark A Turner, Damien Kenny, Alan G Fraser, Marc Gewillig, Anneliene Hechtelt Jonker
{"title":"Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications.","authors":"Tom Melvin, Marc M Dooms, Berthold Koletzko, Mark A Turner, Damien Kenny, Alan G Fraser, Marc Gewillig, Anneliene Hechtelt Jonker","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2404257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Medical Device Regulation (EU)745/2017, increased the regulatory requirements and thus the time and the cost associated with marketing medical devices. For a majority of medical device manufacturers, this has lead to reconsiderations of their product portfolio. The risk of important or essential devices being withdrawn is particularly relevant for pediatric patients and other rare disease patients where limited numbers of devices can be sold and hence the investment needed may not be recovered. This generates critical challenges and opportunities from a regulatory and public health perspective.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This paper is based upon the experience of the authors who contributed to working groups, guidance development and research related to orphan and pediatric devices. We examine the use of medical devices in orphan and pediatric conditions, the relevant aspects of regulations and associated guidance, and we suggest possible policy and practice interventions to ensure the continued availability of essential devices for children and people with rare diseases.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>We recommend a more proactive approach to identifying devices at risk and essential devices, increasing the use of exceptional market approvals, expanding the role of expert panels, engaging with the rare disease communities and supporting registries and standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2404257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Medical Device Regulation (EU)745/2017, increased the regulatory requirements and thus the time and the cost associated with marketing medical devices. For a majority of medical device manufacturers, this has lead to reconsiderations of their product portfolio. The risk of important or essential devices being withdrawn is particularly relevant for pediatric patients and other rare disease patients where limited numbers of devices can be sold and hence the investment needed may not be recovered. This generates critical challenges and opportunities from a regulatory and public health perspective.

Areas covered: This paper is based upon the experience of the authors who contributed to working groups, guidance development and research related to orphan and pediatric devices. We examine the use of medical devices in orphan and pediatric conditions, the relevant aspects of regulations and associated guidance, and we suggest possible policy and practice interventions to ensure the continued availability of essential devices for children and people with rare diseases.

Expert opinion: We recommend a more proactive approach to identifying devices at risk and essential devices, increasing the use of exceptional market approvals, expanding the role of expert panels, engaging with the rare disease communities and supporting registries and standards.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲的孤儿和儿科医疗器械:关于支持标签内和标签外临床适应症可用性的建议。
导言:医疗器械法规(EU)745/2017》提高了监管要求,从而增加了与医疗器械营销相关的时间和成本。对于大多数医疗器械制造商来说,这导致他们重新考虑产品组合。对于儿科患者和其他罕见病患者来说,重要或必需的器械被撤回的风险尤为突出,因为这些器械的销售数量有限,因此可能无法收回所需的投资。这从监管和公共卫生的角度提出了严峻的挑战和机遇:本文基于作者的经验,他们参与了与孤儿和儿科器械相关的工作组、指南制定和研究工作。我们研究了医疗器械在孤儿和儿科疾病中的使用情况、法规和相关指南的相关方面,并提出了可能的政策和实践干预措施,以确保儿童和罕见病患者能够持续获得必要的器械:我们建议采取更加积极主动的方法来识别高风险器械和基本器械,增加例外市场批准的使用,扩大专家小组的作用,与罕见病社区合作,并支持登记册和标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications. Medical device similarity analysis: a promising approach to medical device equivalence regulation. Delivery systems for transcatheter therapies of congenital heart disease. Evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: technology and techniques. Transforming medical education: the impact of innovations in technology and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1