Impact of CFTR Modulator Therapies on Liver Function in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Systematic Review of Hepatic Biomarkers.

Elena Simona Moiceanu, Daniel Corneliu Leucuța, Viorela Gabriela Nițescu, Andreea Lescaie, Maria Iacobescu, Iustina Violeta Stan, Simona Elena Moșescu, Iolanda Cristina Vivisenco, Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu
{"title":"Impact of CFTR Modulator Therapies on Liver Function in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Systematic Review of Hepatic Biomarkers.","authors":"Elena Simona Moiceanu, Daniel Corneliu Leucuța, Viorela Gabriela Nițescu, Andreea Lescaie, Maria Iacobescu, Iustina Violeta Stan, Simona Elena Moșescu, Iolanda Cristina Vivisenco, Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/ivacaftor/tezacaftor (ETI) and lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LI), have revolutionized the treatment of cystic fibrosis. However, their impact on liver function remains unclear, with varying effects reported across studies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of CFTR modulators on liver function in cystic fibrosis patients by evaluating changes in key hepatic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Europe PubMed Central and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included those assessing the impact of CFTR modulators on liver biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies encompassing 195 patients were included, with significant heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcomes. The review found mixed results for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels, with some studies reporting increases and others decreases. LI therapy was associated with significant reductions in GGT and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels, while ETI therapy showed significant increases in bilirubin levels. Albumin levels increased significantly with both therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFTR modulators have varying effects on liver function biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients, with LI therapy generally showing more favorable outcomes on liver health. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the need for more standardized research to better understand these effects and guide clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/ivacaftor/tezacaftor (ETI) and lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LI), have revolutionized the treatment of cystic fibrosis. However, their impact on liver function remains unclear, with varying effects reported across studies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of CFTR modulators on liver function in cystic fibrosis patients by evaluating changes in key hepatic biomarkers.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Europe PubMed Central and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included those assessing the impact of CFTR modulators on liver biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.

Results: Six studies encompassing 195 patients were included, with significant heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcomes. The review found mixed results for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels, with some studies reporting increases and others decreases. LI therapy was associated with significant reductions in GGT and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels, while ETI therapy showed significant increases in bilirubin levels. Albumin levels increased significantly with both therapies.

Conclusions: CFTR modulators have varying effects on liver function biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients, with LI therapy generally showing more favorable outcomes on liver health. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the need for more standardized research to better understand these effects and guide clinical management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CFTR 调节器疗法对囊性纤维化患者肝功能的影响:肝脏生物标志物的系统回顾
背景和目的:囊性纤维化跨膜传导调节器(CFTR)调节剂,包括 elexacaftor/ivacaftor/tezacaftor (ETI) 和 lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LI),已经彻底改变了囊性纤维化的治疗。然而,它们对肝功能的影响仍不明确,不同研究报告的影响也不尽相同。本研究旨在通过评估关键肝脏生物标志物的变化,系统回顾CFTR调节剂对囊性纤维化患者肝功能的影响:在欧洲 PubMed Central 和 PubMed 数据库中对 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的研究进行了全面的文献检索。符合条件的研究包括那些评估CFTR调节剂对囊性纤维化患者肝脏生物标志物影响的研究。尽可能进行元分析:共纳入六项研究,涵盖 195 名患者,研究设计、研究人群和研究结果存在显著异质性。综述发现,丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)和γ谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)水平的研究结果不一,一些研究报告了丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)水平的升高,而另一些研究报告了丙氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)水平的降低。LI疗法能显著降低谷丙转氨酶和碱性磷酸酶(AP)水平,而ETI疗法则能显著提高胆红素水平。两种疗法均可使白蛋白水平明显升高:CFTR调节剂对囊性纤维化患者肝功能生物标志物的影响各不相同,LI疗法通常对肝脏健康更有利。不同研究之间存在明显的异质性,这突出表明需要进行更多的标准化研究,以更好地了解这些影响并指导临床治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the 'Pits and Perils' of Analgesic Therapy in Advanced Liver Disease and Cirrhosis. Anatomical Benchmarks in the Training of Gastroenterologists. Lynch Syndrome-associated Genomic Variants. Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Romania. The Role of Adipokines in Chronic Pancreatitis. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1