Elena Simona Moiceanu, Daniel Corneliu Leucuța, Viorela Gabriela Nițescu, Andreea Lescaie, Maria Iacobescu, Iustina Violeta Stan, Simona Elena Moșescu, Iolanda Cristina Vivisenco, Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu
{"title":"Impact of CFTR Modulator Therapies on Liver Function in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Systematic Review of Hepatic Biomarkers.","authors":"Elena Simona Moiceanu, Daniel Corneliu Leucuța, Viorela Gabriela Nițescu, Andreea Lescaie, Maria Iacobescu, Iustina Violeta Stan, Simona Elena Moșescu, Iolanda Cristina Vivisenco, Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/ivacaftor/tezacaftor (ETI) and lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LI), have revolutionized the treatment of cystic fibrosis. However, their impact on liver function remains unclear, with varying effects reported across studies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of CFTR modulators on liver function in cystic fibrosis patients by evaluating changes in key hepatic biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Europe PubMed Central and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included those assessing the impact of CFTR modulators on liver biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies encompassing 195 patients were included, with significant heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcomes. The review found mixed results for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels, with some studies reporting increases and others decreases. LI therapy was associated with significant reductions in GGT and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels, while ETI therapy showed significant increases in bilirubin levels. Albumin levels increased significantly with both therapies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CFTR modulators have varying effects on liver function biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients, with LI therapy generally showing more favorable outcomes on liver health. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the need for more standardized research to better understand these effects and guide clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, including elexacaftor/ivacaftor/tezacaftor (ETI) and lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LI), have revolutionized the treatment of cystic fibrosis. However, their impact on liver function remains unclear, with varying effects reported across studies. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effects of CFTR modulators on liver function in cystic fibrosis patients by evaluating changes in key hepatic biomarkers.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Europe PubMed Central and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2023. Eligible studies included those assessing the impact of CFTR modulators on liver biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.
Results: Six studies encompassing 195 patients were included, with significant heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcomes. The review found mixed results for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels, with some studies reporting increases and others decreases. LI therapy was associated with significant reductions in GGT and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels, while ETI therapy showed significant increases in bilirubin levels. Albumin levels increased significantly with both therapies.
Conclusions: CFTR modulators have varying effects on liver function biomarkers in cystic fibrosis patients, with LI therapy generally showing more favorable outcomes on liver health. The significant heterogeneity among studies underscores the need for more standardized research to better understand these effects and guide clinical management.