An Authentic Learning Experience for Medical Students on Conducting a Family Meeting.

Mariana Khawand-Azoulai, Elisse Kavensky, Julia Sanchez, Ileana M Leyva, Corinne Ferrari, Marcio Soares, Khin M Zaw, Maria H van Zuilen
{"title":"An Authentic Learning Experience for Medical Students on Conducting a Family Meeting.","authors":"Mariana Khawand-Azoulai, Elisse Kavensky, Julia Sanchez, Ileana M Leyva, Corinne Ferrari, Marcio Soares, Khin M Zaw, Maria H van Zuilen","doi":"10.1177/10499091241286089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical schools often lack training for serious illness conversations with patients and caregivers. We developed a curriculum in our elective Transitioning to Residency medical student course, focused on end-of-life discussions. This paper provides an overview of the curriculum and outcomes from an advanced preparation assignment and student evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The curriculum included a \"hands-on\" skills session delivered via Zoom. Small groups of students (3-4) assumed roles on an interprofessional team (Intensivist, cardiologist, nurse, social worker). They met with two adult children, played by palliative/geriatric clinical staff, of a 79-year-old patient with a complex cardiac history and on ventilator support to address: (1) the patient's status, (2) goals of care, and (3) withdrawal of ventilator support. Using a flipped classroom format, students reviewed the case, role assignments, a family meeting webinar, and other materials in advance. They completed a survey reflecting on the upcoming family meeting. Afterwards, students evaluated the session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty students (19.6%) participated in 2021 and 2022. The reflection survey shows students agreed the patient's prognosis was poor and decision-making should be shared. They anticipated difficulty accepting prognosis, discordance between family members and/or the team, and challenging emotions. Results show a difference between the anticipated roles of the assigned physicians compared to the other disciplines. Post-session evaluations ranged from 4.7 to 4.9/5 (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pre-session reflection helped students prepare for their roles. The training was well received, and we hope it prepares students to take on serious illness discussions during residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091241286089"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241286089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical schools often lack training for serious illness conversations with patients and caregivers. We developed a curriculum in our elective Transitioning to Residency medical student course, focused on end-of-life discussions. This paper provides an overview of the curriculum and outcomes from an advanced preparation assignment and student evaluations.

Methods: The curriculum included a "hands-on" skills session delivered via Zoom. Small groups of students (3-4) assumed roles on an interprofessional team (Intensivist, cardiologist, nurse, social worker). They met with two adult children, played by palliative/geriatric clinical staff, of a 79-year-old patient with a complex cardiac history and on ventilator support to address: (1) the patient's status, (2) goals of care, and (3) withdrawal of ventilator support. Using a flipped classroom format, students reviewed the case, role assignments, a family meeting webinar, and other materials in advance. They completed a survey reflecting on the upcoming family meeting. Afterwards, students evaluated the session.

Results: Eighty students (19.6%) participated in 2021 and 2022. The reflection survey shows students agreed the patient's prognosis was poor and decision-making should be shared. They anticipated difficulty accepting prognosis, discordance between family members and/or the team, and challenging emotions. Results show a difference between the anticipated roles of the assigned physicians compared to the other disciplines. Post-session evaluations ranged from 4.7 to 4.9/5 (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).

Conclusion: The pre-session reflection helped students prepare for their roles. The training was well received, and we hope it prepares students to take on serious illness discussions during residency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生开展家庭会议的真实学习体验。
背景:医学院通常缺乏与病人和护理人员进行重病谈话的培训。我们在医学生过渡到住院医生的选修课程中开发了一门课程,重点是生命末期的讨论。本文概述了该课程以及高级准备作业和学生评估的结果:该课程包括通过 Zoom 提供的 "实践 "技能课程。小组学生(3-4 人)扮演一个跨专业团队(重症监护医生、心脏病专家、护士、社会工作者)的角色。他们与一名有复杂心脏病史并使用呼吸机支持的 79 岁患者的两名成年子女会面,由姑息治疗/老年病临床工作人员扮演,以解决以下问题:(1) 病人的状况,(2) 护理目标,(3) 呼吸机支持的撤销。学生们采用翻转课堂的形式,提前复习了病例、角色分配、家庭会议网络研讨会和其他材料。他们完成了一项调查,对即将举行的家庭会议进行了反思。之后,学生们对课程进行了评估:2021年和2022年共有80名学生(19.6%)参加了此次活动。反思调查显示,学生们同意患者预后不佳,应共同做出决策。他们预计接受预后会有困难,家庭成员和/或团队之间会出现分歧,并且会出现具有挑战性的情绪。结果显示,与其他学科相比,指定医生的预期角色有所不同。会后评价从 4.7 到 4.9/5 不等(1 = 非常不同意,5 = 非常同意):会前反思有助于学生为自己的角色做好准备。培训受到好评,我们希望它能帮助学生为在住院医生实习期间进行重病讨论做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge and Attitude of the General Public Toward Palliative Care in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Differences in Attitudes and Barriers Towards Advance Care Planning Amongst Ischemic Heart Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Mixed Methods Analysis of Standardized Documentation of Serious Illness Conversations Within an Electronic Health Record Module During Hospitalization. Palliative and End-of-Life Care Interventions with Minoritized Populations in the US with Serious Illness: A Scoping Review. Exploring Palliative Care Needs Among Patients With Cancer and Non-Cancer Serious Chronic Diseases: A Comparison Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1