Personal independence payments among people who access mental health services: results from a novel data linkage.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.68
Sharon A M Stevelink, Ioannis Bakolis, Sarah Dorrington, Johnny Downs, Ray Leal, Ira Madan, Ava Phillips, Ben Geiger, Matthew Hotopf, Nicola T Fear
{"title":"Personal independence payments among people who access mental health services: results from a novel data linkage.","authors":"Sharon A M Stevelink, Ioannis Bakolis, Sarah Dorrington, Johnny Downs, Ray Leal, Ira Madan, Ava Phillips, Ben Geiger, Matthew Hotopf, Nicola T Fear","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Personal independence payment (PIP) is a benefit that covers additional daily living costs people may incur from a long-term health condition or disability. Little is known about PIP receipt and associated factors among people who access mental health services, and trends over time. Individual-level data linking healthcare records with administrative records on benefits receipt have been non-existent in the UK.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore how PIP receipt varies over time, including PIP type, and its association with sociodemographic and diagnostic patient characteristics among people who access mental health services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A data-set was established by linking electronic mental health records from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust with administrative records from the Department for Work and Pensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 143 714 working-age patients, 37 120 (25.8%) had received PIP between 2013 and 2019, with PIP receipt steadily increasing over time. Two in three patients (63.2%) had received both the daily living and mobility component. PIP receipt increased with age. Those in more deprived areas were more likely to receive PIP. The likelihood of PIP receipt varied by ethnicity. Patients diagnosed with a severe mental illness had 1.48 odds (95% CI 1.42-1.53) of having received PIP, compared with those with a different psychiatric diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One in four people who accessed mental health services had received PIP, with higher levels seen among those most likely in need, as indicated by a severe mental illness diagnosis. Future research using this data-set could explore the average duration of PIP receipt in people who access mental health services, and re-assessment patterns by psychiatric diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"10 5","pages":"e150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.68","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Personal independence payment (PIP) is a benefit that covers additional daily living costs people may incur from a long-term health condition or disability. Little is known about PIP receipt and associated factors among people who access mental health services, and trends over time. Individual-level data linking healthcare records with administrative records on benefits receipt have been non-existent in the UK.

Aims: To explore how PIP receipt varies over time, including PIP type, and its association with sociodemographic and diagnostic patient characteristics among people who access mental health services.

Method: A data-set was established by linking electronic mental health records from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust with administrative records from the Department for Work and Pensions.

Results: Of 143 714 working-age patients, 37 120 (25.8%) had received PIP between 2013 and 2019, with PIP receipt steadily increasing over time. Two in three patients (63.2%) had received both the daily living and mobility component. PIP receipt increased with age. Those in more deprived areas were more likely to receive PIP. The likelihood of PIP receipt varied by ethnicity. Patients diagnosed with a severe mental illness had 1.48 odds (95% CI 1.42-1.53) of having received PIP, compared with those with a different psychiatric diagnosis.

Conclusions: One in four people who accessed mental health services had received PIP, with higher levels seen among those most likely in need, as indicated by a severe mental illness diagnosis. Future research using this data-set could explore the average duration of PIP receipt in people who access mental health services, and re-assessment patterns by psychiatric diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得精神健康服务的人群中的个人独立支付:新数据链接的结果。
背景:个人自立补助金(PIP)是一项用于支付因长期健康状况或残疾而产生的额外日常生活费用的福利。人们对接受心理健康服务的人领取 PIP 的情况、相关因素以及随时间变化的趋势知之甚少。在英国,将医疗记录与领取福利的行政记录联系起来的个人层面的数据一直不存在。目的:在接受精神健康服务的人群中,探讨领取 PIP 的情况随时间的变化而变化,包括 PIP 的类型及其与社会人口学和诊断性病人特征之间的关联:方法:将南伦敦和莫兹利 NHS 基金会信托基金会的电子精神健康记录与就业和养老金部的行政记录联系起来,建立了一个数据集:在 143 714 名工作年龄患者中,有 37 120 人(25.8%)在 2013 年至 2019 年期间获得了 PIP,随着时间的推移,获得 PIP 的人数稳步增加。每三名患者中就有两名(63.2%)同时领取了日常生活补助和行动补助。领取 PIP 的人数随年龄增长而增加。居住在较贫困地区的患者更有可能获得 PIP。不同种族的患者获得 PIP 的可能性也不同。被诊断患有严重精神疾病的患者与被诊断患有其他精神疾病的患者相比,领取PIP的几率为1.48(95% CI 1.42-1.53):每四名接受精神健康服务的人中就有一人曾接受过 PIP,而在那些最有可能需要的人群中,接受 PIP 的几率更高,因为他们被诊断出患有严重的精神疾病。未来利用该数据集进行的研究可以探索获得精神健康服务的人群接受 PIP 的平均持续时间,以及根据精神病诊断进行重新评估的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Comparing measurements of lithium treatment efficacy in people with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis - CORRIGENDUM. Factors associated with mental health outcomes in a Muslim community following the Christchurch terrorist attack. Breaking barriers in the career development of women in academic psychiatry. Cognitive, adaptive and daily life functioning in adults with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Depression in childhood to early adulthood and respiratory health in early adulthood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1