Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1007/s00259-024-06912-6
Riemer H J A Slart, Marija Punda, Dalal S Ali, Alberto Bazzocchi, Oliver Bock, Pauline Camacho, John J Carey, Anita Colquhoun, Juliet Compston, Klaus Engelke, Paola A Erba, Nicholas C Harvey, Diane Krueger, Willem F Lems, E Michael Lewiecki, Sarah Morgan, Kendall F Moseley, Christopher O'Brien, Linda Probyn, Yumie Rhee, Bradford Richmond, John T Schousboe, Christopher Shuhart, Kate A Ward, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Jules Zhang-Yin, Aliya A Khan
{"title":"Updated practice guideline for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).","authors":"Riemer H J A Slart, Marija Punda, Dalal S Ali, Alberto Bazzocchi, Oliver Bock, Pauline Camacho, John J Carey, Anita Colquhoun, Juliet Compston, Klaus Engelke, Paola A Erba, Nicholas C Harvey, Diane Krueger, Willem F Lems, E Michael Lewiecki, Sarah Morgan, Kendall F Moseley, Christopher O'Brien, Linda Probyn, Yumie Rhee, Bradford Richmond, John T Schousboe, Christopher Shuhart, Kate A Ward, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Jules Zhang-Yin, Aliya A Khan","doi":"10.1007/s00259-024-06912-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology in the 1980s revolutionized the diagnosis, management and monitoring of osteoporosis, providing a clinical tool which is now available worldwide. However, DXA measurements are influenced by many technical factors, including the quality control procedures for the instrument, positioning of the patient, and approach to analysis. Reporting of DXA results may be confounded by factors such as selection of reference ranges for T-scores and Z-scores, as well as inadequate knowledge of current standards for interpretation. These points are addressed at length in many international guidelines but are not always easily assimilated by practising clinicians and technicians. Our aim in this report is to identify key elements pertaining to the use of DXA in clinical practice, considering both technical and clinical aspects. Here, we discuss technical aspects of DXA procedures, approaches to interpretation and integration into clinical practice, and the use of non-bone mineral density measurements, such as a vertebral fracture assessment, in clinical risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11909,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"539-563"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732917/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-024-06912-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology in the 1980s revolutionized the diagnosis, management and monitoring of osteoporosis, providing a clinical tool which is now available worldwide. However, DXA measurements are influenced by many technical factors, including the quality control procedures for the instrument, positioning of the patient, and approach to analysis. Reporting of DXA results may be confounded by factors such as selection of reference ranges for T-scores and Z-scores, as well as inadequate knowledge of current standards for interpretation. These points are addressed at length in many international guidelines but are not always easily assimilated by practising clinicians and technicians. Our aim in this report is to identify key elements pertaining to the use of DXA in clinical practice, considering both technical and clinical aspects. Here, we discuss technical aspects of DXA procedures, approaches to interpretation and integration into clinical practice, and the use of non-bone mineral density measurements, such as a vertebral fracture assessment, in clinical risk assessment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更新了双能 X 射线吸收测量(DXA)实践指南。
20 世纪 80 年代引入的双能量 X 射线吸收测量(DXA)技术为骨质疏松症的诊断、管理和监测带来了革命性的变化,提供了一种目前在全球范围内使用的临床工具。然而,DXA 测量受到许多技术因素的影响,包括仪器的质量控制程序、患者的体位和分析方法。DXA 结果的报告可能会受到一些因素的干扰,如 T 值和 Z 值参考范围的选择,以及对当前判读标准的认识不足。这些问题在许多国际指南中都有详细论述,但临床医师和技术人员并不总能轻易掌握。本报告旨在从技术和临床两个方面,确定在临床实践中使用 DXA 的关键要素。在此,我们将讨论 DXA 程序的技术方面、解释和融入临床实践的方法,以及在临床风险评估中使用非骨矿物质密度测量方法(如椎体骨折评估)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
392
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging serves as a platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific information within nuclear medicine and related professions. It welcomes international submissions from professionals involved in the functional, metabolic, and molecular investigation of diseases. The journal's coverage spans physics, dosimetry, radiation biology, radiochemistry, and pharmacy, providing high-quality peer review by experts in the field. Known for highly cited and downloaded articles, it ensures global visibility for research work and is part of the EJNMMI journal family.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of deep learning-based scatter correction on a long-axial field-of-view PET scanner A hybrid [18F]fluoropivalate PET-multiparametric MRI to detect and characterise brain tumour metastases based on a permissive environment for monocarboxylate transport Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels Optimizing MR-based attenuation correction in hybrid PET/MR using deep learning: validation with a flatbed insert and consistent patient positioning Unveiling the potential of copper-61 vs. gallium-68 for SSTR PET imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1