Co-designing a vaping cessation program for Australian young adults: A conceptual model.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae222
Nicola Rahman, Bernadette Sebar, Ernesta Sofija
{"title":"Co-designing a vaping cessation program for Australian young adults: A conceptual model.","authors":"Nicola Rahman, Bernadette Sebar, Ernesta Sofija","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Australian young adults (YA) report difficulties in quitting vaping. This study sought to understand what a vaping cessation program should look like from the perspective of current and former vapers, and professionals/experts involved in this health space, to inform the development of a conceptual model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection was informed by Social Cognitive Theory using co-design methodology to explore vaping cessation. Interactive workshops and semi-structured interviews were held online between March 2023-January 2024, with data from participants' narratives and written materials thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>YAs (18-24 years) identifying as current or former vapers (n=15) and health professionals/experts'(n=13) insights informed the model framework, incorporating three main elements based on environmental, personal and behavioural factors shaping vaping cessation. Four design considerations were identified; the program needs to be affordable, accessible, appropriate and adaptable. YAs expressed a strong preference to share their quitting journey with peers, endorsing a digital forum providing a hybrid framework of support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaping cessation is nuanced and complex requiring a multi-faceted approach targeted to the specific needs of the young adult population.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings can be used to inform the development of a vaping cessation program tailored to young adults in Australia and other similar contexts. Young adults perceived sharing the quitting journey and being inspired by the lived experience of others as critical components for successful vaping cessation. Social Cognitive Theory is demonstrated to be a valuable behaviour change framework for understanding vaping cessation and should be considered in future research of intervention development.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Australian young adults (YA) report difficulties in quitting vaping. This study sought to understand what a vaping cessation program should look like from the perspective of current and former vapers, and professionals/experts involved in this health space, to inform the development of a conceptual model.

Methods: Data collection was informed by Social Cognitive Theory using co-design methodology to explore vaping cessation. Interactive workshops and semi-structured interviews were held online between March 2023-January 2024, with data from participants' narratives and written materials thematically analysed.

Results: YAs (18-24 years) identifying as current or former vapers (n=15) and health professionals/experts'(n=13) insights informed the model framework, incorporating three main elements based on environmental, personal and behavioural factors shaping vaping cessation. Four design considerations were identified; the program needs to be affordable, accessible, appropriate and adaptable. YAs expressed a strong preference to share their quitting journey with peers, endorsing a digital forum providing a hybrid framework of support.

Conclusions: Vaping cessation is nuanced and complex requiring a multi-faceted approach targeted to the specific needs of the young adult population.

Implications: The findings can be used to inform the development of a vaping cessation program tailored to young adults in Australia and other similar contexts. Young adults perceived sharing the quitting journey and being inspired by the lived experience of others as critical components for successful vaping cessation. Social Cognitive Theory is demonstrated to be a valuable behaviour change framework for understanding vaping cessation and should be considered in future research of intervention development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同设计针对澳大利亚年轻人的停止吸食毒品计划:概念模型。
导言:澳大利亚的年轻成年人(YA)表示很难戒掉吸烟。这项研究试图从现在和以前的吸食者以及参与这一健康领域的专业人士/专家的角度来了解戒烟计划应该是什么样的,从而为概念模型的开发提供信息:数据收集以社会认知理论为指导,采用共同设计的方法来探讨戒烟问题。2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 1 月期间,在网上举行了互动研讨会和半结构式访谈,并对参与者的叙述和书面材料中的数据进行了专题分析:结果:青年吸烟者(18-24 岁)中有 15 人目前或曾经吸食过烟草,健康专业人员/专家(13 人)的见解为模型框架提供了信息,该框架包含了基于环境、个人和行为因素的三个主要元素,这些因素影响着吸烟者的戒烟行为。确定了四项设计考虑因素:该计划需要负担得起、容易获得、适当和适应性强。青年吸烟者表示非常愿意与同龄人分享他们的戒烟历程,赞同数字论坛提供一个混合支持框架:结论:戒烟是一个细致而复杂的问题,需要针对年轻成年人的特殊需求采取多方面的方法:研究结果可用于为澳大利亚和其他类似国家的年轻人量身定制戒烟计划。年轻人认为分享戒烟历程和从他人的生活经历中得到启发是成功戒烟的关键因素。社会认知理论被证明是理解戒烟的一个有价值的行为改变框架,在未来的干预发展研究中应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Diversity and Impacting Factors of Smoke-Free Legislation and Implementation in Mainland China: A Case Qualitative Research. Structural stigma and inequities in tobacco use among sexual and gender minoritized people: Accounting for context and intersectionality. Tobacco industry-backed third parties sow confusion and doubt amongst the public health community. AI for Tobacco Control: Identifying Tobacco-promoting Social Media Content Using Large Language Models. Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1