Dietary counseling plus omega-3 supplementation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: results of a randomized wait-list controlled pilot trial (the 'EASe-GAD Trial').

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Nutritional Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1080/1028415X.2024.2403901
Monique Aucoin, Laura LaChance, Inge van der Wurff, Meagan McLaren, Sasha Monteiro, Sean Miller, Andrew Jenkins, Elham Sabri, Kieran Cooley
{"title":"Dietary counseling plus omega-3 supplementation in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: results of a randomized wait-list controlled pilot trial (the 'EASe-GAD Trial').","authors":"Monique Aucoin, Laura LaChance, Inge van der Wurff, Meagan McLaren, Sasha Monteiro, Sean Miller, Andrew Jenkins, Elham Sabri, Kieran Cooley","doi":"10.1080/1028415X.2024.2403901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical evidence suggests that nutrition interventions can significantly improve symptoms of major depressive disorder; however, the effect on clinical anxiety symptoms in individuals with anxiety disorders has not been studied. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nutrition intervention. The secondary objectives included assessing changes in anxiety symptom severity, diet quality, self-efficacy, mindful eating, quality of life, and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a randomized, wait-list controlled pilot trial delivering a 12-week, biweekly dietary counseling intervention and omega-3 supplementation to 50 adult women with generalized anxiety disorder. Questionnaires and blood work were completed at baseline, after the waiting period, and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>443 individuals expressed interest within eight months; 50 met the criteria for enrollment. The mean number of sessions attended was 6.4. Final questionnaires were completed by 46 participants. Eighty-four percent of participants strongly agreed with the statement 'My experience during this study was positive'. The mean anxiety symptom severity score in the intervention group was 26.2 (95% CI 22.94-29.48) at baseline and 11.0 (95% CI 8.05-13.87) at week 12. The mean diet quality score was 7.2 (95% CI 6.32-8.10) and 10.5 (95% CI 9.55-11.49) at baseline and week 12, respectively. Among the waitlist participants, the mean baseline anxiety score was 29.3 (95% CI 24.73-33.91) and 26.8 (95% CI 22.09-31.56) at week 12.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study was feasible and acceptable. Participation in the intervention was associated with a decrease in anxiety symptoms. These findings lay the foundation for large-scale studies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05573672.</p>","PeriodicalId":19423,"journal":{"name":"Nutritional Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutritional Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2024.2403901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical evidence suggests that nutrition interventions can significantly improve symptoms of major depressive disorder; however, the effect on clinical anxiety symptoms in individuals with anxiety disorders has not been studied. The primary objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a nutrition intervention. The secondary objectives included assessing changes in anxiety symptom severity, diet quality, self-efficacy, mindful eating, quality of life, and biomarkers.

Methods: This study was a randomized, wait-list controlled pilot trial delivering a 12-week, biweekly dietary counseling intervention and omega-3 supplementation to 50 adult women with generalized anxiety disorder. Questionnaires and blood work were completed at baseline, after the waiting period, and after the intervention.

Results: 443 individuals expressed interest within eight months; 50 met the criteria for enrollment. The mean number of sessions attended was 6.4. Final questionnaires were completed by 46 participants. Eighty-four percent of participants strongly agreed with the statement 'My experience during this study was positive'. The mean anxiety symptom severity score in the intervention group was 26.2 (95% CI 22.94-29.48) at baseline and 11.0 (95% CI 8.05-13.87) at week 12. The mean diet quality score was 7.2 (95% CI 6.32-8.10) and 10.5 (95% CI 9.55-11.49) at baseline and week 12, respectively. Among the waitlist participants, the mean baseline anxiety score was 29.3 (95% CI 24.73-33.91) and 26.8 (95% CI 22.09-31.56) at week 12.

Discussion: This study was feasible and acceptable. Participation in the intervention was associated with a decrease in anxiety symptoms. These findings lay the foundation for large-scale studies. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05573672.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮食咨询加欧米茄-3 补充剂治疗广泛性焦虑症:随机等待对照试验("EASe-GAD 试验")的结果。
研究目的临床证据表明,营养干预能明显改善重度抑郁症的症状;但对焦虑症患者临床焦虑症状的影响尚未进行研究。本研究的首要目标是评估营养干预的可行性和可接受性。次要目标包括评估焦虑症状严重程度、饮食质量、自我效能感、注意饮食、生活质量和生物标志物的变化:本研究是一项随机、候补名单对照试验,为 50 名患有广泛性焦虑症的成年女性提供为期 12 周、每两周一次的饮食咨询干预和欧米伽-3 补充剂。分别在基线期、等待期和干预期后完成问卷调查和血液检查:8个月内有443人表示有兴趣接受干预,其中50人符合入选标准。参加干预的平均次数为 6.4 次。46 名参与者完成了最终问卷调查。84%的参与者非常同意 "我在这项研究中的经历是积极的 "这一说法。干预组的焦虑症状严重程度平均得分在基线时为 26.2(95% CI 22.94-29.48),在第 12 周时为 11.0(95% CI 8.05-13.87)。饮食质量的平均得分在基线和第 12 周分别为 7.2(95% CI 6.32-8.10)和 10.5(95% CI 9.55-11.49)。在候补名单参与者中,基线焦虑平均得分为 29.3(95% CI 24.73-33.91),第 12 周为 26.8(95% CI 22.09-31.56):这项研究是可行和可接受的。参与干预与焦虑症状的减轻有关。这些发现为大规模研究奠定了基础。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05573672。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutritional Neuroscience
Nutritional Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
236
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutritional Neuroscience is an international, interdisciplinary broad-based, online journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the field of nutrition that relates to the central and peripheral nervous system. Studies may include the role of different components of normal diet (protein, carbohydrate, fat, moderate use of alcohol, etc.), dietary supplements (minerals, vitamins, hormones, herbs, etc.), and food additives (artificial flavours, colours, sweeteners, etc.) on neurochemistry, neurobiology, and behavioural biology of all vertebrate and invertebrate organisms. Ideally this journal will serve as a forum for neuroscientists, nutritionists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and those interested in preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effects of resveratrol supplementation on inflammatory markers, fatigue scale, fasting blood sugar and lipid profile in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Effects of whey-derived lactopeptide β-lactolin on cognitive performance in mild cognitive impairment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Immunonutrition: future perspective in neurodegenerative disorders. The impact of a prebiotic-rich diet and/or probiotic supplements on human cognition: Secondary outcomes from the 'Gut Feelings' randomised controlled trial. Association of serum vitamin C concentrations with Alzheimer's disease mortality among U.S. adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1