Li Zhang, Fengliang Wang, Cong Wan, Jichun Tang, Jiarui Qin
{"title":"Prognostic Nutritional Index and the Survival of Patients with Endometrial cancer: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Li Zhang, Fengliang Wang, Cong Wan, Jichun Tang, Jiarui Qin","doi":"10.1007/s43032-024-01686-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has emerged as a potential predictor of clinical outcomes in various cancers. However, a quantativetily analysis of its role in endometrial cancer (EC) remains lacking. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI on the survival outcomes of patients with EC. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to identify relevant cohort studies. Studies were included if they provided sufficient data to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on PNI levels. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. A total of 10 studies, encompassing 3656 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that a low PNI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.62-2.49, p < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 54%) and PFS (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.74-4.33, p < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 78%) in patients with EC. Subgroup analyses indicated that the prognostic impact of PNI was consistent in studies from Asian and non-Asian countries, and across studies with different ages of the patients, cutoff values of PNI, and follow-up duration (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05). In conclusion, the PNI is a prognostic marker for survival in patients with EC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20920,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"3779-3794"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-024-01686-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has emerged as a potential predictor of clinical outcomes in various cancers. However, a quantativetily analysis of its role in endometrial cancer (EC) remains lacking. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the prognostic value of PNI on the survival outcomes of patients with EC. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to identify relevant cohort studies. Studies were included if they provided sufficient data to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) based on PNI levels. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled HRs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity. A total of 10 studies, encompassing 3656 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that a low PNI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.62-2.49, p < 0.05; I2 = 54%) and PFS (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.74-4.33, p < 0.05; I2 = 78%) in patients with EC. Subgroup analyses indicated that the prognostic impact of PNI was consistent in studies from Asian and non-Asian countries, and across studies with different ages of the patients, cutoff values of PNI, and follow-up duration (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05). In conclusion, the PNI is a prognostic marker for survival in patients with EC.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Sciences (RS) is a peer-reviewed, monthly journal publishing original research and reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. RS is multi-disciplinary and includes research in basic reproductive biology and medicine, maternal-fetal medicine, obstetrics, gynecology, reproductive endocrinology, urogynecology, fertility/infertility, embryology, gynecologic/reproductive oncology, developmental biology, stem cell research, molecular/cellular biology and other related fields.