Parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences with the content of an individual care plan for pediatric palliative care: a mixed-method study.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241277572
Chantal Y Joren, Marijke C Kars, Leontien C M Kremer, Suzanne C Hofman, Hester Rippen-Wagner, Ria Slingerland-Blom, Chantal van der Velden, Meggi Schuiling-Otten, A A Eduard Verhagen, Judith L Aris-Meijer
{"title":"Parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences with the content of an individual care plan for pediatric palliative care: a mixed-method study.","authors":"Chantal Y Joren, Marijke C Kars, Leontien C M Kremer, Suzanne C Hofman, Hester Rippen-Wagner, Ria Slingerland-Blom, Chantal van der Velden, Meggi Schuiling-Otten, A A Eduard Verhagen, Judith L Aris-Meijer","doi":"10.1177/26323524241277572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Individual Care Plan (ICP) for pediatric palliative care translates the general guideline recommendations into a personalized plan for the child. Various documents exist in pediatrics globally, aimed at facilitating anticipatory care or coordinating end-of-life care. The ICP aims both, but user experiences have not been studied post-development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The overall aim is to enhance knowledge and understanding of the content of the ICP from the perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p><p><strong>Design and method: </strong>We conducted a mixed-method study using a convergent parallel design consisting of questionnaires and individual and focus group interviews among parents and HCPs having user experience with the ICP. The questionnaire and interview data were analyzed separately. Quantitative data were descriptively analyzed using mean, ±SD, and median. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. A narrative approach and joint display were used to describe the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 27 parents and 161 HCPs participated. Overall, the content of the ICP was seen as important and complete, but changes and additions were called for on language, structure, and content. The chapter on the needs and wishes of child and parents was considered most important. HCPs would like to see this chapter expanded to incorporate more advance care planning outcomes, and parents wished for this chapter to reflect better who their child is. HCPs mentioned missing a chapter for palliative sedation, mainly to guide other HCPs. The ICP was appraised as not user-friendly and might possibly improve by making the ICP available in a secure digital environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To meet the needs of parents and HCPs considering importance and completeness of the content of the ICP and its user-friendliness, changes are necessary in the content of the ICP, and preferably the ICP should be made digitally available. Although various documents exist globally to facilitate anticipatory care or coordinating end-of-life care, it appears that the combination of describing the values and preferences of the child and parents, along with medical decisions and life-sustaining treatments, makes the ICP a unique and comprehensive care plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241277572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Individual Care Plan (ICP) for pediatric palliative care translates the general guideline recommendations into a personalized plan for the child. Various documents exist in pediatrics globally, aimed at facilitating anticipatory care or coordinating end-of-life care. The ICP aims both, but user experiences have not been studied post-development.

Objective: The overall aim is to enhance knowledge and understanding of the content of the ICP from the perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Design and method: We conducted a mixed-method study using a convergent parallel design consisting of questionnaires and individual and focus group interviews among parents and HCPs having user experience with the ICP. The questionnaire and interview data were analyzed separately. Quantitative data were descriptively analyzed using mean, ±SD, and median. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. A narrative approach and joint display were used to describe the results.

Results: In total, 27 parents and 161 HCPs participated. Overall, the content of the ICP was seen as important and complete, but changes and additions were called for on language, structure, and content. The chapter on the needs and wishes of child and parents was considered most important. HCPs would like to see this chapter expanded to incorporate more advance care planning outcomes, and parents wished for this chapter to reflect better who their child is. HCPs mentioned missing a chapter for palliative sedation, mainly to guide other HCPs. The ICP was appraised as not user-friendly and might possibly improve by making the ICP available in a secure digital environment.

Conclusion: To meet the needs of parents and HCPs considering importance and completeness of the content of the ICP and its user-friendliness, changes are necessary in the content of the ICP, and preferably the ICP should be made digitally available. Although various documents exist globally to facilitate anticipatory care or coordinating end-of-life care, it appears that the combination of describing the values and preferences of the child and parents, along with medical decisions and life-sustaining treatments, makes the ICP a unique and comprehensive care plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长和医护人员对儿科姑息关怀个人护理计划内容的体验:一项混合方法研究。
背景:儿科姑息关怀的个体关怀计划(ICP)将一般指南建议转化为针对儿童的个性化计划。全球儿科领域存在各种文件,旨在促进预期护理或协调临终关怀。ICP 兼顾了这两个目的,但尚未对开发后的用户体验进行研究:总体目标是从家长和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)的角度出发,加强对 ICP 内容的认识和理解:我们进行了一项混合方法研究,采用了聚合平行设计,包括向家长和具有 ICP 使用经验的医护人员发放调查问卷、进行个人访谈和焦点小组访谈。问卷和访谈数据分别进行分析。定量数据采用平均值、±SD 和中位数进行描述性分析。对定性数据进行主题分析。结果:共有 27 名家长和 161 名保健医生参与。总体而言,ICP 的内容被认为是重要和完整的,但在语言、结构和内容方面需要进行修改和补充。关于儿童和家长的需求和愿望的章节被认为是最重要的。高级保健医生希望这一章能够扩展,纳入更多的预先护理规划结果,而家长则希望这一章能够更好地反映他们孩子的身份。医护人员提到缺少一个关于姑息镇静的章节,主要是为了指导其他医护人员。ICP 被评价为对用户不友好,通过在安全的数字环境中提供 ICP 可能会有所改善:为了满足家长和 HCP 的需求,考虑到 ICP 内容的重要性和完整性以及其用户友好性,有必要对 ICP 的内容进行修改,最好将 ICP 数字化。尽管全球已有各种文件来促进预期护理或协调临终关怀,但将儿童和家长的价值观和偏好与医疗决定和维持生命的治疗相结合,似乎使 ICP 成为一种独特而全面的护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering timely integrated palliative care in nursing homes through critical companionship: experiences from a Padi-Palli interventional study in France. Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study. Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: a content analysis of rationales. Adapting, implementing and evaluating a navigation intervention for older people with cancer and their family caregivers in six countries in Europe: the Horizon Europe-funded EU NAVIGATE project. Understanding end-of-life doula care provision: reporting on the design of a bereavement survey to evaluate doula support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1