Are patients without insurance coverage less likely to undergo surgery for humeral shaft fractures? A national database analysis.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.048
Daniel B Calem, Tej Joshi, Francis G Alberta, Eitan M Kohan
{"title":"Are patients without insurance coverage less likely to undergo surgery for humeral shaft fractures? A national database analysis.","authors":"Daniel B Calem, Tej Joshi, Francis G Alberta, Eitan M Kohan","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Historically, humeral shaft fractures have been managed nonoperatively in a functional brace. However, recent studies suggest an increase in rates of operative fixation. Disparities in surgical management based on insurance status have been demonstrated across many orthopedic conditions. This study aimed to identify if a correlation exists between insurance coverage and the probability of undergoing operative fixation for a humeral shaft fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective examination of the National Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Patients diagnosed with isolated closed humeral shaft fractures were identified via International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, and surgical interventions were identified using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision procedural codes. Utilizing weighted data, a total of 56,468 patients with isolated closed humeral shaft fractures were identified, 25,075 (44.4%) of whom underwent operative fixation. A univariate analysis was conducted using Pearson's chi-square test to isolate variables for inclusion in a multivariable analysis. A binary logistic regression analysis was then employed to explore demographic and other pertinent factors. Findings were reported as odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for social and demographic variables, patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.58; P < .001), Medicare (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; P < .001), and self-pay patients (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84; P < .001) were less likely to undergo operative fixation of humeral shaft fracture than those with private insurance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients without private insurance or those with no insurance coverage are less likely to undergo operative fixation for humeral shaft fractures compared to those with private insurance, even after adjusting for social and demographic variables. The observed variability underscores the necessity for more refined treatment guidelines for humeral shaft fractures. Surgeons should be aware of these potential biases affecting management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Historically, humeral shaft fractures have been managed nonoperatively in a functional brace. However, recent studies suggest an increase in rates of operative fixation. Disparities in surgical management based on insurance status have been demonstrated across many orthopedic conditions. This study aimed to identify if a correlation exists between insurance coverage and the probability of undergoing operative fixation for a humeral shaft fracture.

Methods: A retrospective examination of the National Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Patients diagnosed with isolated closed humeral shaft fractures were identified via International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, and surgical interventions were identified using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision procedural codes. Utilizing weighted data, a total of 56,468 patients with isolated closed humeral shaft fractures were identified, 25,075 (44.4%) of whom underwent operative fixation. A univariate analysis was conducted using Pearson's chi-square test to isolate variables for inclusion in a multivariable analysis. A binary logistic regression analysis was then employed to explore demographic and other pertinent factors. Findings were reported as odds ratios.

Results: After controlling for social and demographic variables, patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.50-0.58; P < .001), Medicare (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; P < .001), and self-pay patients (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.84; P < .001) were less likely to undergo operative fixation of humeral shaft fracture than those with private insurance.

Conclusions: Patients without private insurance or those with no insurance coverage are less likely to undergo operative fixation for humeral shaft fractures compared to those with private insurance, even after adjusting for social and demographic variables. The observed variability underscores the necessity for more refined treatment guidelines for humeral shaft fractures. Surgeons should be aware of these potential biases affecting management decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有保险的患者是否不太可能接受肱骨轴骨折手术?全国数据库分析。
背景:一直以来,肱骨轴骨折都是在功能性支具中进行非手术治疗。然而,最近的研究表明,手术固定的比例有所增加。基于保险状况的手术管理差异已在许多骨科疾病中得到证实。本研究旨在确定保险范围与肱骨轴骨折接受手术固定的概率之间是否存在相关性:方法:对2016年至2021年的国家再入院数据库(NRD)进行了回顾性研究。通过国际疾病分类第十次修订版(ICD-10)代码确定被诊断为孤立闭合性肱骨轴骨折的患者,并通过ICD-10程序代码确定手术干预。利用加权数据,共确定了56468名孤立闭合性肱骨轴骨折患者,其中25075人(44.4%)接受了手术固定。使用皮尔逊卡方检验进行了单变量分析,以分离出纳入多变量分析的变量。然后采用二元逻辑回归分析来探讨人口统计学和其他相关因素。结果以几率比(ORs)的形式报告:结果:在对社会和人口统计学变量进行控制后,享受医疗补助的患者(OR,0.54;95% CI,0.50-0.58;p结论:没有私人保险或没有医疗保险的患者在接受治疗时,其患病率要比享受医疗补助的患者高:与有私人保险的患者相比,没有私人保险或没有保险的患者接受肱骨轴骨折手术固定的可能性较低,即使在调整了社会和人口变量后也是如此。观察到的差异突出表明,有必要制定更完善的肱骨轴骨折治疗指南。外科医生应该意识到这些影响管理决策的潜在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Comparable low revision rates of stemmed and stemless total anatomic shoulder arthroplasties after exclusion of metal-backed glenoid components: a collaboration between the Australian and Danish national shoulder arthroplasty registries. Open Bankart repair plus inferior capsular shift versus isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair in collision athletes with recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study. Glenoid track revisited. Management of the failed Latarjet procedure. Comparison of 3D computer-assisted planning with and without patient-specific instrumentation for severe bone defects in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1