Real-world public health interventions demonstrate how research evidence informs program scale-up.

Abstract

Evidence-based population interventions rely on intervention testing (efficacy and effectiveness trials) to determine what works to improve public health. We investigated the characteristics of real-world public health interventions to address obesity and explored the extent to which research testing was undertaken prior to scale-up. We identified 90 population health interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition or obesity-related health behaviours and collected publicly available information on their key characteristics and outcomes. We then assessed the differences between interventions that followed a research pathway and those that did not. Two-thirds (n = 60) of the interventions were reported as having followed a research pathway. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that these interventions were more likely to be health education interventions [odds ratio (OR): 5.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38-22.38], developed by research institutes (OR: 12.81; 95% CI: 3.47-47.34), delivered in North America (OR: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.61-10.62), and less likely to be owned (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.88) or funded by government organizations (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.14-0.95). Interventions that followed a research pathway were nearly three times more likely to have a positive impact on population health (OR: 2.72; 95% CI: 1.04-7.14). Interventions that followed a research pathway to scale-up were no more likely to be sustained longer than those that did not. Differences exist across real-world interventions between those that follow a research pathway to population-scale delivery and those that do not, regarding organizational and environmental context. A key benefit of research pathway to scale-up is the impact it has on health outcomes.