Study of Efficacy of a Novel Formative Assessment Tool: Keywords Recall.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Cureus Pub Date : 2024-09-21 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.69881
K Venkatesh, D Muthukumar, E Kamala, M Muhil
{"title":"Study of Efficacy of a Novel Formative Assessment Tool: Keywords Recall.","authors":"K Venkatesh, D Muthukumar, E Kamala, M Muhil","doi":"10.7759/cureus.69881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Formative assessment is a crucial component of a Competency-Based Medical Education curriculum. Keywords are concise representations of the central ideas and themes explored within a subject. Taking a memory test evaluates knowledge as well as improves future memory. Aim and objectives This study intended to study the efficacy of the \"keywords teaching\" technique and \"keywords recall\" after a teaching-learning session as an effective tool for formative assessment and the correlation between the performance of students in summative assessments. Materials and methods Students of first-year professional faculty of medicine students 2022-23 batch attending pre-clinical (physiology) classroom lectures aged between 18-21 years belonging to both genders who consented to voluntary participation in the study were included in the study. Scores of formative sessions by multiple choice questions, keywords recall assessment tool, and summative sessions were analyzed using paired t-tests. Scores of formative assessments and summative assessments were correlated using Pearson correlation analysis. Results Analysis showed formative assessments had a significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05) relationship with summative assessment performance. The study indicates a positive correlation between scores for both formative and summative assessments, highlighting the importance of formative assessment in improved academic performance. Conclusion Optimal learning can be achieved by testing that emphasizes recall retrieval practice and that is repeated at intervals over time. This study suggests that \"keywords recall\" after a teaching-learning session is an effective tool for formative assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Formative assessment is a crucial component of a Competency-Based Medical Education curriculum. Keywords are concise representations of the central ideas and themes explored within a subject. Taking a memory test evaluates knowledge as well as improves future memory. Aim and objectives This study intended to study the efficacy of the "keywords teaching" technique and "keywords recall" after a teaching-learning session as an effective tool for formative assessment and the correlation between the performance of students in summative assessments. Materials and methods Students of first-year professional faculty of medicine students 2022-23 batch attending pre-clinical (physiology) classroom lectures aged between 18-21 years belonging to both genders who consented to voluntary participation in the study were included in the study. Scores of formative sessions by multiple choice questions, keywords recall assessment tool, and summative sessions were analyzed using paired t-tests. Scores of formative assessments and summative assessments were correlated using Pearson correlation analysis. Results Analysis showed formative assessments had a significant (P < 0.05) relationship with summative assessment performance. The study indicates a positive correlation between scores for both formative and summative assessments, highlighting the importance of formative assessment in improved academic performance. Conclusion Optimal learning can be achieved by testing that emphasizes recall retrieval practice and that is repeated at intervals over time. This study suggests that "keywords recall" after a teaching-learning session is an effective tool for formative assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型形成性评估工具的功效研究:关键词回忆。
背景 形成性评估是能力本位医学教育课程的重要组成部分。关键词是一门学科的中心思想和主题的简明表述。记忆测试可评估知识,并改善未来记忆。目的和目标 本研究旨在研究 "关键词教学 "技术和教学环节后的 "关键词回忆 "作为形成性评估的有效工具的功效,以及学生在终结性评估中的表现之间的相关性。材料与方法 研究对象包括参加临床前(生理学)课堂教学的医学专业 2022-23 批次一年级学生,年龄在 18-21 岁之间,男女不限,自愿参加研究。通过选择题、关键词回忆评估工具对形成性评价和总结性评价的得分进行配对 t 检验。采用皮尔逊相关分析法对形成性评估和总结性评估的得分进行相关分析。结果 分析表明,形成性评估与终结性评估成绩有显著关系(P < 0.05)。研究表明,形成性评价和终结性评价的得分之间存在正相关,突出了形成性评价对提高学习成绩的重要性。结论 通过强调回忆检索练习并在一段时间内重复进行的测试,可以达到最佳学习效果。本研究表明,教学环节后的 "关键词回忆 "是形成性评价的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Routine Preoperative Ultrasound-Guided Airway Examination Versus Clinical Airway Examination in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy in Patients Coming for Elective Surgery: An Observational Study. Unearthing Influenza's Unusual Neurological Impact. The Current Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Detection of Its Complications: A Systematic Review. Assessment of Optimal Treatment Strategies and Their Outcomes in T3N1 Rectal Cancers. Effective Pain Management of Postherpetic Neuralgia Using a Combination of Analgesics and Conservative Measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1