The oxygen puzzle in FLASH radiotherapy: A comprehensive review and experimental outlook

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100860
Andrea Scarmelotto , Victor Delprat , Carine Michiels , Stéphane Lucas , Anne-Catherine Heuskin
{"title":"The oxygen puzzle in FLASH radiotherapy: A comprehensive review and experimental outlook","authors":"Andrea Scarmelotto ,&nbsp;Victor Delprat ,&nbsp;Carine Michiels ,&nbsp;Stéphane Lucas ,&nbsp;Anne-Catherine Heuskin","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>FLASH radiotherapy is attracting increasing interest because it maintains tumor control while inflicting less damage to normal tissues compared to conventional radiotherapy. This sparing effect, the so-called FLASH effect, is achieved when radiation is delivered at ultra-high dose rates (≥40 Gy/s). Although the FLASH effect has already been demonstrated in several preclinical models, a complete mechanistic description explaining why tumors and normal tissues respond differently is still missing. None of the current hypotheses fully explains the experimental evidence. A common point between many of these is the role of oxygen, which is described as a major factor, either through transient hypoxia in the form of dissolved molecules, or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Therefore, this review focuses on both forms of this molecule, retracing old and more recent theories, while proposing new mechanisms that could provide a complete description of the FLASH effect based on preclinical and experimental evidence. In addition, this manuscript describes a set of experiments designed to provide the FLASH community with new tools for exploring the post-irradiation fate of ROS and their potential biological implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 100860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400137X/pdfft?md5=b43eb0285d3f5ab4366e1ffa3994ed62&pid=1-s2.0-S240563082400137X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400137X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

FLASH radiotherapy is attracting increasing interest because it maintains tumor control while inflicting less damage to normal tissues compared to conventional radiotherapy. This sparing effect, the so-called FLASH effect, is achieved when radiation is delivered at ultra-high dose rates (≥40 Gy/s). Although the FLASH effect has already been demonstrated in several preclinical models, a complete mechanistic description explaining why tumors and normal tissues respond differently is still missing. None of the current hypotheses fully explains the experimental evidence. A common point between many of these is the role of oxygen, which is described as a major factor, either through transient hypoxia in the form of dissolved molecules, or reactive oxygen species (ROS). Therefore, this review focuses on both forms of this molecule, retracing old and more recent theories, while proposing new mechanisms that could provide a complete description of the FLASH effect based on preclinical and experimental evidence. In addition, this manuscript describes a set of experiments designed to provide the FLASH community with new tools for exploring the post-irradiation fate of ROS and their potential biological implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FLASH 放射治疗中的氧气难题:全面回顾与实验展望
与传统放疗相比,FLASH 放疗既能控制肿瘤,又能减少对正常组织的损伤,因此越来越受到关注。当以超高剂量率(≥40 Gy/s)进行放射治疗时,就能达到这种疏导效果,即所谓的 "FLASH效应"。虽然 FLASH 效应已在多个临床前模型中得到证实,但仍缺乏完整的机理描述来解释肿瘤和正常组织为何会产生不同的反应。目前没有一种假说能完全解释实验证据。许多假说的共同点是氧的作用,氧被描述为一个主要因素,要么是通过溶解分子形式的瞬时缺氧,要么是活性氧(ROS)。因此,本综述将重点放在这两种形式的分子上,追溯旧的和最新的理论,同时根据临床前和实验证据提出新的机制,以完整描述 FLASH效应。此外,本手稿还描述了一组实验,旨在为 FLASH 社区提供探索 ROS 辐射后命运及其潜在生物学影响的新工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1