Understanding the SSARC model of task sequencing: Assessing L2 writing development

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Assessing Writing Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.asw.2024.100893
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari , Yizhou Wang , Michol Miller
{"title":"Understanding the SSARC model of task sequencing: Assessing L2 writing development","authors":"Mahmoud Abdi Tabari ,&nbsp;Yizhou Wang ,&nbsp;Michol Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to explore the impact of task sequencing on the development of second language (L2) writing and investigate how L2 learners performed on three decision-making writing tasks completed in different orders over nine weeks. 120 advanced-high EFL students were randomly assigned to one of three groups and given different task sequences: 1) a simple-medium-complex (SMC) sequence, 2) a complex-medium-simple sequence (CMS), or 3) a random sequence (RDM). Essays were analyzed using measures of syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF). Results showed that the CALF of L2 writing demonstrated longitudinal development over time in all three task sequencing groups. CALF development was not immediately apparent in the first six weeks, with most measures displaying a significant increase by the end of the ninth week. Furthermore, different task sequences resulted in varying patterns and magnitudes of CALF growth, but no specific sequence was found to be superior overall.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 100893"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the impact of task sequencing on the development of second language (L2) writing and investigate how L2 learners performed on three decision-making writing tasks completed in different orders over nine weeks. 120 advanced-high EFL students were randomly assigned to one of three groups and given different task sequences: 1) a simple-medium-complex (SMC) sequence, 2) a complex-medium-simple sequence (CMS), or 3) a random sequence (RDM). Essays were analyzed using measures of syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF). Results showed that the CALF of L2 writing demonstrated longitudinal development over time in all three task sequencing groups. CALF development was not immediately apparent in the first six weeks, with most measures displaying a significant increase by the end of the ninth week. Furthermore, different task sequences resulted in varying patterns and magnitudes of CALF growth, but no specific sequence was found to be superior overall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解任务排序的 SSARC 模型:评估 L2 写作发展
本研究旨在探讨任务顺序对第二语言(L2)写作发展的影响,并调查 L2 学习者在九周时间内以不同顺序完成三项决策性写作任务时的表现。120名EFL高年级学生被随机分配到三组中的一组,并被赋予不同的任务顺序:1)简单-中等-复杂(SMC)序列;2)复杂-中等-简单序列(CMS);或3)随机序列(RDM)。我们使用句法复杂性、准确性、词汇复杂性和流畅性(CALF)等指标对作文进行了分析。结果显示,在所有三个任务序列组中,L2 写作的 CALF 都随着时间的推移呈现纵向发展。在前六周,CALF 的发展并不明显,但到第九周结束时,大多数测量指标都有了显著的提高。此外,不同的任务序列会导致不同的 CALF 增长模式和幅度,但总体而言,没有发现任何特定的序列具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of voice in Chinese English-major undergraduates’ timed and untimed argument writing The impact of task duration on the scoring of independent writing responses of adult L2-English writers A structural equation investigation of linguistic features as indices of writing quality in assessed secondary-level EMI learners’ scientific reports Detecting and assessing AI-generated and human-produced texts: The case of second language writing teachers Validating an integrated reading-into-writing scale with trained university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1