Women's perceptions of the use of virtual reality during childbirth: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104184
{"title":"Women's perceptions of the use of virtual reality during childbirth: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Childbearing women often resort to pharmacotherapies for pain and anxiety management during childbirth, despite their adverse effects. Virtual reality has emerged as an alternative, but a comprehensive synthesis of women's experiences with virtual reality during labor is lacking, hindering validation of its perceived effects.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To synthesize the best available evidence of women's perceptions of the use of virtual reality during childbirth.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From the beginning until December 31, 2023, a comprehensive search was conducted across nine databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global), with no restrictions on publication year but limited to English language only. Qualitative findings focusing on women's experiences with virtual reality during childbirth were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and thematic analysis framework, with evidence assessed through GRADE-CERQual.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight studies were included, revealing a central theme: \"The Journey of Childbirth through the Lens of Virtual Reality\", supported by four themes: collective experiences and sentiments; labor pain and anxiety mitigation; Contentment and enthusiasm for subsequent utilization; and preferences and improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This qualitative systematic review explored women's unique experiences with virtual reality during childbirth. It highlighted the need for ongoing research and collaborative efforts in healthcare to enhance virtual reality interventions, ensuring their efficacy in obstetrics for competent childbirth management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002675","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Childbearing women often resort to pharmacotherapies for pain and anxiety management during childbirth, despite their adverse effects. Virtual reality has emerged as an alternative, but a comprehensive synthesis of women's experiences with virtual reality during labor is lacking, hindering validation of its perceived effects.

Aim

To synthesize the best available evidence of women's perceptions of the use of virtual reality during childbirth.

Methods

From the beginning until December 31, 2023, a comprehensive search was conducted across nine databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global), with no restrictions on publication year but limited to English language only. Qualitative findings focusing on women's experiences with virtual reality during childbirth were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and appraised quality. Data synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and thematic analysis framework, with evidence assessed through GRADE-CERQual.

Results

Eight studies were included, revealing a central theme: "The Journey of Childbirth through the Lens of Virtual Reality", supported by four themes: collective experiences and sentiments; labor pain and anxiety mitigation; Contentment and enthusiasm for subsequent utilization; and preferences and improvements.

Conclusion

This qualitative systematic review explored women's unique experiences with virtual reality during childbirth. It highlighted the need for ongoing research and collaborative efforts in healthcare to enhance virtual reality interventions, ensuring their efficacy in obstetrics for competent childbirth management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妇女对分娩过程中使用虚拟现实技术的看法:定性系统综述和元综合
背景育龄妇女在分娩过程中通常会采用药物疗法来控制疼痛和焦虑,尽管这些疗法会产生不良影响。目的综合妇女对分娩期间使用虚拟现实技术的看法的现有最佳证据。方法从开始到 2023 年 12 月 31 日,我们对九个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global)进行了全面检索,对出版年份没有限制,但仅限于英语。研究纳入了关注妇女在分娩过程中使用虚拟现实体验的定性研究成果。两名审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估质量。数据综合遵循了乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的《证据综合手册》和主题分析框架,并通过 GRADE-CERQual 对证据进行了评估:结果纳入了八项研究,揭示了一个中心主题:"虚拟现实镜头下的分娩之旅",并辅以四个主题:集体体验和情感;减轻分娩疼痛和焦虑;对后续使用的满足感和热情;以及偏好和改进。结论本定性系统综述探讨了妇女在分娩过程中使用虚拟现实技术的独特体验。它强调了在医疗保健领域进行持续研究和合作的必要性,以加强虚拟现实干预措施,确保其在产科中的有效性,从而实现有效的分娩管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1