Nonanthropocentric climate ethics

John Nolt, Trevor Hedberg
{"title":"Nonanthropocentric climate ethics","authors":"John Nolt, Trevor Hedberg","doi":"10.1002/wcc.920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropogenic climate change poses increasingly severe long‐term threats to living things worldwide. It may even contribute to a mass extinction that would leave biodiversity depleted for millions of years—quite possibly longer than the duration of the human species. Such effects are obviously of ethical concern, but because traditional ethical theories have focused on the relatively short‐term interests of human beings, they offer little guidance. In the late 20th century, a growing number of ethical activists and theorists sought to expand moral consideration to nonhuman animals and to the diverse life forms and habitats of wild nature. Simultaneously and at first independently, others began to develop long‐term (sometimes called “intergenerational”) ethics, which extends moral consideration into the distant future. Concerns about future climate change quickly became a central focus of this work. But only in this century have there been concerted efforts to integrate these lines of thought into far‐sighted nonanthropocentric climate ethics. These efforts are the subject of this review.This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Climate, Nature, and Ethics &gt; Ethics and Climate Change</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Integrated Assessment of Climate Change &gt; Assessing Climate Change in the Context of Other Issues</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Climate, Nature, and Ethics &gt; Comparative Environmental Values</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropogenic climate change poses increasingly severe long‐term threats to living things worldwide. It may even contribute to a mass extinction that would leave biodiversity depleted for millions of years—quite possibly longer than the duration of the human species. Such effects are obviously of ethical concern, but because traditional ethical theories have focused on the relatively short‐term interests of human beings, they offer little guidance. In the late 20th century, a growing number of ethical activists and theorists sought to expand moral consideration to nonhuman animals and to the diverse life forms and habitats of wild nature. Simultaneously and at first independently, others began to develop long‐term (sometimes called “intergenerational”) ethics, which extends moral consideration into the distant future. Concerns about future climate change quickly became a central focus of this work. But only in this century have there been concerted efforts to integrate these lines of thought into far‐sighted nonanthropocentric climate ethics. These efforts are the subject of this review.This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Ethics and Climate Change Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Assessing Climate Change in the Context of Other Issues Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Comparative Environmental Values
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非人类中心主义气候伦理
人为气候变化对全世界的生物构成日益严重的长期威胁。它甚至可能导致生物大灭绝,使生物多样性在数百万年内枯竭--很可能比人类的生存期还要长。这种影响显然是伦理关注的问题,但由于传统的伦理理论关注的是人类相对短期的利益,因此提供的指导并不多。20 世纪末,越来越多的伦理活动家和理论家试图将道德考量扩大到非人类动物以及野生自然的各种生命形式和栖息地。与此同时,其他人开始发展长期(有时称为 "代际")伦理学,将道德考虑延伸到遥远的未来。对未来气候变化的担忧很快成为这项工作的核心重点。但直到本世纪,人们才齐心协力,将这些思路整合为高瞻远瞩的非人类中心主义气候伦理学。本文将对这些努力进行综述:气候、自然与伦理学; 伦理学与气候变化 气候变化的综合评估; 在其他问题背景下评估气候变化 气候、自然与伦理学; 比较环境价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is a New Economic System Necessary to Address Climate Change? Climate Change Cognition, Affect, and Behavior in Youth: A Scoping Review India's Coal Conundrum: Decarbonization Amidst A Developmental Legacy Public Communication of Climate and Justice: A Scoping Review Intergenerational Ethics and Climate Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1