Comparative imaging study of patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction due to mild COVID-19 using structural and functional MRI

David Dylan García-Meléndez, Raquel Moreno Presa, Pilar Quintana Castro, Bárbara Serrano Calleja, Sara Rosenstone Calvo, María Isabel Morales-Casado
{"title":"Comparative imaging study of patients with persistent olfactory dysfunction due to mild COVID-19 using structural and functional MRI","authors":"David Dylan García-Meléndez,&nbsp;Raquel Moreno Presa,&nbsp;Pilar Quintana Castro,&nbsp;Bárbara Serrano Calleja,&nbsp;Sara Rosenstone Calvo,&nbsp;María Isabel Morales-Casado","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Persistent post-COVID olfactory dysfunction continues to be studied due to the controversy in its pathophysiology and neuroimaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The patients had confirmed mild COVID-19 infection with olfactory dysfunction of more than one month of evolution and they were compared to controls with normal olfaction, assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test and underwent brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the olfactory bulb and olfactory function.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 8 patients and 2 controls participated. The average age of the patients was 34.5 years (SD 8.5), and that of the controls was 28.5 (SD 2.1). The average score in the patients’ olfactory test was 7.9 points (SD 2.2). In brain and olfactory bulb MRI tests, no morphological differences were found. When evaluated by functional MRI, none of the patients activated the entorhinal area in comparison to the controls, who did show activation at this level. Activation of secondary olfactory areas in cases and controls were as follows: orbitofrontal (25% vs 100%), basal ganglia (25% vs 50%) and insula (38% vs 0%) respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There were no observed morphological changes in the brain MRI. Unlike the controls, none of the patients activated the entorhinal cortex in the olfactory functional MRI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":"163 6","pages":"Pages 286-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624003991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Persistent post-COVID olfactory dysfunction continues to be studied due to the controversy in its pathophysiology and neuroimaging.

Materials and methods

The patients had confirmed mild COVID-19 infection with olfactory dysfunction of more than one month of evolution and they were compared to controls with normal olfaction, assessed using the Sniffin’ Sticks Olfactory Test and underwent brain, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the olfactory bulb and olfactory function.

Results

A total of 8 patients and 2 controls participated. The average age of the patients was 34.5 years (SD 8.5), and that of the controls was 28.5 (SD 2.1). The average score in the patients’ olfactory test was 7.9 points (SD 2.2). In brain and olfactory bulb MRI tests, no morphological differences were found. When evaluated by functional MRI, none of the patients activated the entorhinal area in comparison to the controls, who did show activation at this level. Activation of secondary olfactory areas in cases and controls were as follows: orbitofrontal (25% vs 100%), basal ganglia (25% vs 50%) and insula (38% vs 0%) respectively.

Conclusions

There were no observed morphological changes in the brain MRI. Unlike the controls, none of the patients activated the entorhinal cortex in the olfactory functional MRI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用结构和功能磁共振成像对轻度 COVID-19 引起的持续性嗅觉功能障碍患者进行成像对比研究
材料与方法 患者确诊为轻度 COVID-19 感染,并伴有超过一个月的嗅觉功能障碍,将他们与嗅觉正常的对照组进行比较,使用嗅棒嗅觉测试(Sniffin' Sticks Olfactory Test)进行评估,并对嗅球和嗅觉功能进行脑部磁共振成像(MRI)检查。患者的平均年龄为 34.5 岁(SD 8.5),对照组的平均年龄为 28.5 岁(SD 2.1)。患者的嗅觉测试平均分为 7.9 分(标准差为 2.2 分)。在大脑和嗅球核磁共振成像测试中,没有发现任何形态学差异。通过功能性核磁共振成像进行评估时,与对照组相比,患者均未激活内嗅区,而对照组则显示激活了内嗅区。病例和对照组的次级嗅区激活情况如下:眶额叶(25% vs 100%)、基底节(25% vs 50%)和岛叶(38% vs 0%)。与对照组不同的是,在嗅觉功能磁共振成像中,没有一名患者激活了内侧皮层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Segmental arterial mediolysis mimicking polyarteritis nodosa Recurrent Guillain Barré Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis and follow-up of a patient with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and large vessel vasculitis Risk stratification for CNS infection: A potential tool to avoid unwarranted lumbar punctures – An observational study Efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in primary Sjögren's syndrome-related interstitial lung disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1