The allocation and erosive effects of on-wall flow on loess gully heads

IF 5.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Catena Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2024.108422
Hongliang Kang , Wenlong Wang , Mingming Guo , Yibao Lou
{"title":"The allocation and erosive effects of on-wall flow on loess gully heads","authors":"Hongliang Kang ,&nbsp;Wenlong Wang ,&nbsp;Mingming Guo ,&nbsp;Yibao Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2024.108422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>On-wall flow and jet flow converted from upstream flow at the gully brink play important but differential roles in gully head erosion. However, on-wall flow allocation at gully brinks and its erosive effects on vegetation-covered loess gully heads remain unclear. Simulated flow scouring experiments were conducted on grass-covered gully heads under different inflow rates (3.0–7.2 m<sup>3</sup>/h) and upstream slope gradients (1–7°) to investigate the on-wall flow proportion and relationships with the hydraulic parameters of upstream flow, as well as erosion and sediment yield characteristics. The results showed that the on-wall flow rates linearly increased with increasing inflow rate (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) but decreased as the slope gradient increased, whereas the jet flow rate increased as the inflow rate or slope gradient increased. The on-wall flow proportions ranged from 24.6 % to 58.7 % and decreased with increasing inflow rate or slope gradient, whereas the jet flow proportions exhibited the reverse trend. The on-wall and jet flow proportions had the most significant correlations with the Froude number, following a negative power function and positive logarithmic function (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01), respectively. The breadth and depth of the scour hole that developed on the gully headwall increased linearly with the on-wall flow rate (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Jet flow had a limited effect of accumulation on scour hole development, with average increases of 13.5 % and 8.6 % in the breadth and depth, respectively. On-wall flow generally contributed 17.6 %–48.4 % of the sediment driven by on-wall and jet flows but played a dominant role under 1° upstream slope gradient and 3.6 m<sup>3</sup>/h inflow rate in which the contribution reached 64.9 %. On-wall flow might have dominated the runoff volume and played a dominant role in the sediment yield under low upstream slope gradients and inflow rates and was essentially responsible for scour hole development, which could destabilize and retreat the gully head.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816224006192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On-wall flow and jet flow converted from upstream flow at the gully brink play important but differential roles in gully head erosion. However, on-wall flow allocation at gully brinks and its erosive effects on vegetation-covered loess gully heads remain unclear. Simulated flow scouring experiments were conducted on grass-covered gully heads under different inflow rates (3.0–7.2 m3/h) and upstream slope gradients (1–7°) to investigate the on-wall flow proportion and relationships with the hydraulic parameters of upstream flow, as well as erosion and sediment yield characteristics. The results showed that the on-wall flow rates linearly increased with increasing inflow rate (P < 0.01) but decreased as the slope gradient increased, whereas the jet flow rate increased as the inflow rate or slope gradient increased. The on-wall flow proportions ranged from 24.6 % to 58.7 % and decreased with increasing inflow rate or slope gradient, whereas the jet flow proportions exhibited the reverse trend. The on-wall and jet flow proportions had the most significant correlations with the Froude number, following a negative power function and positive logarithmic function (P < 0.01), respectively. The breadth and depth of the scour hole that developed on the gully headwall increased linearly with the on-wall flow rate (P < 0.01). Jet flow had a limited effect of accumulation on scour hole development, with average increases of 13.5 % and 8.6 % in the breadth and depth, respectively. On-wall flow generally contributed 17.6 %–48.4 % of the sediment driven by on-wall and jet flows but played a dominant role under 1° upstream slope gradient and 3.6 m3/h inflow rate in which the contribution reached 64.9 %. On-wall flow might have dominated the runoff volume and played a dominant role in the sediment yield under low upstream slope gradients and inflow rates and was essentially responsible for scour hole development, which could destabilize and retreat the gully head.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
壁上流对黄土沟头的分配和侵蚀作用
沟谷边缘的壁流及由上游水流转化而来的喷射流在沟头侵蚀中发挥着重要但不同的作用。然而,沟谷边缘的壁上流分配及其对植被覆盖的黄土沟谷沟头的侵蚀作用仍不清楚。在不同流入率(3.0-7.2 m3/h)和上游坡度(1-7°)条件下,对植被覆盖的沟头进行了模拟水流冲刷实验,以研究沟头壁流比例及其与上游水流水力参数的关系,以及侵蚀和泥沙产出特征。结果表明,壁上流量随流入率的增加而线性增加(P <0.01),但随坡度的增加而减少,而喷射流量则随流入率或坡度的增加而增加。壁上流比例在 24.6% 到 58.7% 之间,随着流入率或坡度的增加而降低,而喷射流比例则呈现相反的趋势。壁上流和喷射流比例与弗劳德数的相关性最为显著,分别为负幂函数和正对数函数(P < 0.01)。沟谷顶壁形成的冲刷洞的宽度和深度随壁内流速的增加而线性增加(P < 0.01)。喷射流对冲蚀洞发展的累积影响有限,其宽度和深度分别平均增加了 13.5% 和 8.6%。壁上流对壁上流和喷射流所推动的沉积物的贡献率一般为 17.6%-48.4%,但在上游坡度为 1°、流速为 3.6 立方米/小时的情况下,壁上流的贡献率达到了 64.9%,占据了主导地位。在上游坡度和流入率较低的情况下,贴壁流可能在径流量中占主导地位,并在泥沙量中起主要作用,主要负责冲刷孔的形成,这可能会破坏沟头的稳定并使其后退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
期刊最新文献
Effect of bedrock permeability on runoff and soil loss in soil-mantled karst slopes under successive rainfall conditions Effects of different land-use types on soil detachment capacity in loess areas Cliff-foot sandy cones: A proxy to study the time frames, patterns and rates of sandstone caprock decay? Relationship between soil structure and hydrological properties of the active layer in the permafrost region of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau based on fractal theory Decadal trends of black carbon and heavy metal accumulation in a lake sediment core from central China: A historical perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1