Exploring EFL learners’ perceived promise and limitations of using an artificial intelligence speech evaluation system for speaking practice

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH System Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.system.2024.103497
Bin Zou , Sara Liviero , Qing Ma , Weilei Zhang , Yiran Du , Peiling Xing
{"title":"Exploring EFL learners’ perceived promise and limitations of using an artificial intelligence speech evaluation system for speaking practice","authors":"Bin Zou ,&nbsp;Sara Liviero ,&nbsp;Qing Ma ,&nbsp;Weilei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiran Du ,&nbsp;Peiling Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.system.2024.103497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' perceptions of the promise and limitations of <em>EAP Talk</em>, an AI-based speech evaluation system, for speaking practice. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 366 EFL learners across five universities through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal that <em>EAP Talk</em> significantly enhances speaking skills, including pronunciation, grammar accuracy, idea-organization, read-aloud, and presentation skills. Participants appreciated the convenience, motivational aspects, and institutional efficiency of <em>EAP Talk</em>, which allowed for flexible and autonomous learning. However, several limitations were identified. Issues with the accuracy of voice recognition and score feedback affected learners' confidence in the feedback. The relevance of practice materials to academic courses was another concern, as was the limited detail in the feedback provided by <em>EAP Talk</em>, which often lacked comprehensive explanations and corrective guidance. The absence of feedback on grammar accuracy and speech organization further limited the tool's effectiveness for developing comprehensive speaking proficiency. These findings suggest that while <em>EAP Talk</em> holds significant potential for enhancing language learning, ongoing improvements are necessary to address its limitations. This study contributes to the understanding of how <span>AI</span> tools can support EFL learners for speaking practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48185,"journal":{"name":"System","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 103497"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"System","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X24002793","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' perceptions of the promise and limitations of EAP Talk, an AI-based speech evaluation system, for speaking practice. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 366 EFL learners across five universities through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal that EAP Talk significantly enhances speaking skills, including pronunciation, grammar accuracy, idea-organization, read-aloud, and presentation skills. Participants appreciated the convenience, motivational aspects, and institutional efficiency of EAP Talk, which allowed for flexible and autonomous learning. However, several limitations were identified. Issues with the accuracy of voice recognition and score feedback affected learners' confidence in the feedback. The relevance of practice materials to academic courses was another concern, as was the limited detail in the feedback provided by EAP Talk, which often lacked comprehensive explanations and corrective guidance. The absence of feedback on grammar accuracy and speech organization further limited the tool's effectiveness for developing comprehensive speaking proficiency. These findings suggest that while EAP Talk holds significant potential for enhancing language learning, ongoing improvements are necessary to address its limitations. This study contributes to the understanding of how AI tools can support EFL learners for speaking practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索英语语言学习者在口语练习中使用人工智能语音评估系统的前景和局限性
本研究探讨了英语作为外语(EFL)的学习者对基于人工智能的语音评估系统 EAP Talk 在口语练习中的前景和局限性的看法。研究采用混合方法,通过问卷调查和半结构式访谈收集了五所大学 366 名英语为外语的学习者的数据。研究结果表明,EAP Talk 显著提高了口语技能,包括发音、语法准确性、思路组织、朗读和演讲技能。学员们对 EAP Talk 的便利性、激励性和机构效率表示赞赏,认为它可以实现灵活自主的学习。但也发现了一些局限性。语音识别和分数反馈的准确性问题影响了学员对反馈的信心。练习材料与学术课程的相关性是另一个令人担忧的问题,EAP Talk 提供的反馈细节有限,往往缺乏全面的解释和纠正指导。缺乏语法准确性和语言组织方面的反馈进一步限制了该工具在培养综合口语能力方面的有效性。这些研究结果表明,尽管 EAP Talk 在提高语言学习方面具有巨大潜力,但仍需不断改进以解决其局限性。本研究有助于了解人工智能工具如何支持 EFL 学习者进行口语练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
System
System Multiple-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: This international journal is devoted to the applications of educational technology and applied linguistics to problems of foreign language teaching and learning. Attention is paid to all languages and to problems associated with the study and teaching of English as a second or foreign language. The journal serves as a vehicle of expression for colleagues in developing countries. System prefers its contributors to provide articles which have a sound theoretical base with a visible practical application which can be generalized. The review section may take up works of a more theoretical nature to broaden the background.
期刊最新文献
The effect of instruction on the development of L2 interactional competence: Listener responses in Chinese as a second language From shy to fly: Facilitating EFL learners’ willingness to communicate with an AI chatbot and an intelligent tutoring system Task-based pronunciation teaching: Lack of auditory precision but not memory hinders learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1