Técnicas de reconstrucción mamaria con colgajos de perforantes: nuestra experiencia y comparación con otras técnicas quirúrgicas

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1016/j.senol.2024.100628
María del Rosario Martín-Merino Acera, Esther Colmenarejo García, Carla Ferrero San Román, Adela Valdazo Gómez, Iris Sánchez Egido, Lucía Latorre Marlasca, Gloria Paseiro Crespo
{"title":"Técnicas de reconstrucción mamaria con colgajos de perforantes: nuestra experiencia y comparación con otras técnicas quirúrgicas","authors":"María del Rosario Martín-Merino Acera,&nbsp;Esther Colmenarejo García,&nbsp;Carla Ferrero San Román,&nbsp;Adela Valdazo Gómez,&nbsp;Iris Sánchez Egido,&nbsp;Lucía Latorre Marlasca,&nbsp;Gloria Paseiro Crespo","doi":"10.1016/j.senol.2024.100628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) have started to be used in the last decade in conservative breast cancer surgery in patients who require relatively large volume of excision (20%).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We present a series of 30 cases who have undergone breast conservation surgery plus CWPF reconstruction in our surgery department between 2020 and 2024. A total of 86.6% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.6% were diagnosed with a benign pathology, or needed correction of aesthetic defects following radiotherapy (6.6%).</div><div>This retrospective observational study examines data on flap characteristics, need for re-excision to ensure clear margins after a lumpectomy and surgical complications. These data have been compared with those obtained using other breast reconstruction techniques without CWPF.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immediate post-operative complications occurred in 13.3% of patients, the re-excision rate was 15.3% and no recurrences were detected during the follow-up period. These percentages are similar to those described in previous literature and to other types of surgery that do not use CWPF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although CWPF breast reconstruction techniques are not yet widely accepted in Spain, we consider that they can be very useful in selected patients to avoid mastectomies and their associated complications, as well as improving breast remodelling before or after radiotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38058,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214158224000562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) have started to be used in the last decade in conservative breast cancer surgery in patients who require relatively large volume of excision (20%).

Methods

We present a series of 30 cases who have undergone breast conservation surgery plus CWPF reconstruction in our surgery department between 2020 and 2024. A total of 86.6% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.6% were diagnosed with a benign pathology, or needed correction of aesthetic defects following radiotherapy (6.6%).
This retrospective observational study examines data on flap characteristics, need for re-excision to ensure clear margins after a lumpectomy and surgical complications. These data have been compared with those obtained using other breast reconstruction techniques without CWPF.

Results

Immediate post-operative complications occurred in 13.3% of patients, the re-excision rate was 15.3% and no recurrences were detected during the follow-up period. These percentages are similar to those described in previous literature and to other types of surgery that do not use CWPF.

Conclusions

Although CWPF breast reconstruction techniques are not yet widely accepted in Spain, we consider that they can be very useful in selected patients to avoid mastectomies and their associated complications, as well as improving breast remodelling before or after radiotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿孔器皮瓣乳房重建技术:我们的经验以及与其他手术技术的比较
导言近十年来,胸壁穿孔器皮瓣(CWPF)开始用于需要相对较大切除量(20%)的患者的保守性乳腺癌手术。方法我们对2020年至2024年间在我院外科接受保乳手术加CWPF重建的30例患者进行了系列研究。这项回顾性观察研究研究了皮瓣特征、肿块切除术后为确保边缘清晰而再次切除的必要性以及手术并发症等方面的数据。结果13.3%的患者出现术后即刻并发症,再次切除率为15.3%,随访期间未发现复发。结论虽然CWPF乳房再造技术在西班牙尚未被广泛接受,但我们认为它对特定患者非常有用,可以避免乳房切除术及其相关并发症,还能改善放疗前后的乳房重塑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria
Revista de Senologia y Patologia Mamaria Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
63 days
期刊最新文献
The role of AI and virtual environments in the Future Breast Unit Cáncer de mama en mujeres mayores de 80 años: tratamiento primario Correlación entre la carga tumoral total de los ganglios linfáticos analizada mediante One Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) y la decisión de realizar una linfadenectomía axilar en el cáncer de mama temprano Del Ars Magna a la inteligencia artificial generativa ¿Es posible realizar la biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela (BSGC) en una paciente con mastectomía preservadora de piel y pezón? Descripción de un caso
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1