Symptom severity reported by older adults with cancer and its impact on survival prognostication

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of geriatric oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102073
{"title":"Symptom severity reported by older adults with cancer and its impact on survival prognostication","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Symptom burden is a crucial factor for survival prognostication, but older adults may report fewer and less severe symptoms than younger patients. We investigated the impact of age on symptom severity and its prognostic implications in the prognostic model for advanced cancer (PRO-MAC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Eight hundred forty subjects with incurable cancer, who were reviewed by palliative medicine at a tertiary university hospital, were categorized into four groups based on age: &lt; 65 (young), 65–74 (young-old), 75–84 (old-old), and ≥ 85 (oldest-old) for comparison. The study compared individual symptoms reported on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and analyzed the significance of each prognostic variable in the PRO-MAC model using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for all age categories. We generated the log-rank test for each age group to evaluate the effectiveness of PRO-MAC across age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Rsults</h3><div>The older adults had significantly lower unadjusted mean scores in pain, tiredness, anxiety, wellbeing, and ESAS-r summative score compared to young adults. There was a higher proportion of older adults with no symptoms. The ESAS-r summative score remained a significant prognostic factor only in the young and young-old groups. More participants in the older age groups had dementia, which may impact reporting of symptom severity. Despite these findings, the PRO-MAC model remains applicable across all age groups as a multi-domain 90-day survival prognostication tool.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Symptom burden, including pain, tiredness, anxiety, wellbeing, as well as summative ESASr scores, are lower in older adults with cancer. This could affect the prognostication of survival using symptom burden. However, a multi-dimensional prognostic model like PRO-MAC remains effective for older adults with advanced cancer. Further research is needed to explore tools that can help older adults express the severity of their symptoms and incorporate this into survival prognostication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406824001796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Symptom burden is a crucial factor for survival prognostication, but older adults may report fewer and less severe symptoms than younger patients. We investigated the impact of age on symptom severity and its prognostic implications in the prognostic model for advanced cancer (PRO-MAC).

Materials and Methods

Eight hundred forty subjects with incurable cancer, who were reviewed by palliative medicine at a tertiary university hospital, were categorized into four groups based on age: < 65 (young), 65–74 (young-old), 75–84 (old-old), and ≥ 85 (oldest-old) for comparison. The study compared individual symptoms reported on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and analyzed the significance of each prognostic variable in the PRO-MAC model using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for all age categories. We generated the log-rank test for each age group to evaluate the effectiveness of PRO-MAC across age groups.

Rsults

The older adults had significantly lower unadjusted mean scores in pain, tiredness, anxiety, wellbeing, and ESAS-r summative score compared to young adults. There was a higher proportion of older adults with no symptoms. The ESAS-r summative score remained a significant prognostic factor only in the young and young-old groups. More participants in the older age groups had dementia, which may impact reporting of symptom severity. Despite these findings, the PRO-MAC model remains applicable across all age groups as a multi-domain 90-day survival prognostication tool.

Discussion

Symptom burden, including pain, tiredness, anxiety, wellbeing, as well as summative ESASr scores, are lower in older adults with cancer. This could affect the prognostication of survival using symptom burden. However, a multi-dimensional prognostic model like PRO-MAC remains effective for older adults with advanced cancer. Further research is needed to explore tools that can help older adults express the severity of their symptoms and incorporate this into survival prognostication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年癌症患者报告的症状严重程度及其对生存预后的影响
引言 症状负担是生存预后的一个关键因素,但与年轻患者相比,老年人报告的症状可能更少、更轻。我们研究了年龄对症状严重程度的影响及其在晚期癌症预后模型(PRO-MAC)中的预后意义。材料与方法在一家三级大学医院接受姑息医学检查的 840 名无法治愈的癌症患者根据年龄被分为四组:65 岁(年轻)、65-74 岁(年轻-年老)、75-84 岁(年老)和≥ 85 岁(最年老),以进行比较。该研究比较了埃德蒙顿症状评估系统修订版(ESAS-r)中报告的各个症状,并采用多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析法对所有年龄组的 PRO-MAC 模型中的每个预后变量进行了意义分析。我们对每个年龄组进行了对数秩检验,以评估 PRO-MAC 在不同年龄组中的有效性。结果与年轻人相比,老年人在疼痛、疲倦、焦虑、幸福感和 ESAS-r 总分方面的未调整平均得分明显较低。无症状的老年人比例更高。ESAS-r 总分仍然是仅在年轻人组和年轻老年人组中具有重要意义的预后因素。老年组中有更多的参与者患有痴呆症,这可能会影响对症状严重程度的报告。尽管有这些发现,PRO-MAC 模型仍然适用于所有年龄组,是一种多领域的 90 天生存预后工具。讨论患有癌症的老年人的症状负担(包括疼痛、疲倦、焦虑和幸福感)以及 ESASr 总分较低。这可能会影响使用症状负担来预测生存期。不过,像 PRO-MAC 这样的多维预后模型对晚期癌症老年人仍然有效。还需要进一步研究,探索能帮助老年人表达症状严重程度并将其纳入生存预后的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
The effect of YOCAS©® yoga on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in older (60+) vs. younger (≤ 59) cancer survivors: Secondary analysis of a nationwide, multicenter, phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Symptom severity reported by older adults with cancer and its impact on survival prognostication Dose reduced preoperative chemotherapy in older patients with resectable gastroesophageal cancer: A real-world data study Factors associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease: A SEER-Medicare study Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram in patients aged ≥65 years with stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1