Standardized procedure managing limb reconstruction and post traumatic complications: Acute shortening-relengthening and multipotent stem cells

Marianna Faggiani , Salvatore Risitano , Giorgio Borella , Giuseppe Malizia , Eraclite Pertuccelli , Luigi Conforti , Alessandro Massè
{"title":"Standardized procedure managing limb reconstruction and post traumatic complications: Acute shortening-relengthening and multipotent stem cells","authors":"Marianna Faggiani ,&nbsp;Salvatore Risitano ,&nbsp;Giorgio Borella ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Malizia ,&nbsp;Eraclite Pertuccelli ,&nbsp;Luigi Conforti ,&nbsp;Alessandro Massè","doi":"10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims and objectives</h3><div>Circular External Fixation (CEF) is a complex and long-term treatment used to manage bone gaps and limb reconstructions after post traumatic complications. The purpose of this study is to introduce an innovative management protocol to reduce the time of illness.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A multicentric retrospective study including patients treated with CEF for post traumatic complications was conducted. In Group A were enrolled patients with a bone gap managed with bifocal acute shortening and relengthening (Bifocal ASR) and infiltrated with multipotent stem cells (MSC) at a selected time between 60 and 90 days after the frame application. In Group B patients with bone gaps were managed by bone transport (BT) without cell infiltration. Radiological and clinical outcomes have been collected at a minimum 1-year follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>23 patients were enrolled. At the final follow-up, 3 patients in Group B had docking point problems, 1 case of acquired deformity, 3 delays in bone healing and 7 patients needed another surgical procedure before the removal of the frame. Group A achieved a radiographic union and stable clinical test in an average of 5 months, Group B in 9 months. The average of time between the application of the external fixation and the frame removal was 6,1 months for Group A and 11 months for Group B.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A treatment protocol for patients with bone gap managed with CEF with Bifocal ASR technique and infiltration of MSC in a set time, allows to achieve a healing and removal of the fixator more quickly.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Article 100473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773157X24001681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and objectives

Circular External Fixation (CEF) is a complex and long-term treatment used to manage bone gaps and limb reconstructions after post traumatic complications. The purpose of this study is to introduce an innovative management protocol to reduce the time of illness.

Materials and methods

A multicentric retrospective study including patients treated with CEF for post traumatic complications was conducted. In Group A were enrolled patients with a bone gap managed with bifocal acute shortening and relengthening (Bifocal ASR) and infiltrated with multipotent stem cells (MSC) at a selected time between 60 and 90 days after the frame application. In Group B patients with bone gaps were managed by bone transport (BT) without cell infiltration. Radiological and clinical outcomes have been collected at a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Results

23 patients were enrolled. At the final follow-up, 3 patients in Group B had docking point problems, 1 case of acquired deformity, 3 delays in bone healing and 7 patients needed another surgical procedure before the removal of the frame. Group A achieved a radiographic union and stable clinical test in an average of 5 months, Group B in 9 months. The average of time between the application of the external fixation and the frame removal was 6,1 months for Group A and 11 months for Group B.

Conclusions

A treatment protocol for patients with bone gap managed with CEF with Bifocal ASR technique and infiltration of MSC in a set time, allows to achieve a healing and removal of the fixator more quickly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理肢体重建和创伤后并发症的标准化程序:急性缩短-延长和多能干细胞
目的和目标圆形外固定术(CEF)是一种复杂的长期治疗方法,用于处理创伤后并发症后的骨间隙和肢体重建。本研究的目的是介绍一种创新的管理方案,以缩短患病时间。材料和方法进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,包括使用 CEF 治疗创伤后并发症的患者。在A组中,骨间隙患者接受了双焦急性缩短和再延长术(Bifocal ASR)治疗,并在框架应用后60至90天的选定时间浸润了多潜能干细胞(MSC)。在 B 组中,有骨间隙的患者通过骨转运(BT)治疗,但没有细胞浸润。在至少 1 年的随访中收集了放射学和临床结果。在最后的随访中,B 组有 3 名患者出现对接点问题,1 名患者出现后天性畸形,3 名患者骨愈合延迟,7 名患者在拆除骨架前需要再次手术。A 组平均在 5 个月内达到放射学结合和稳定的临床测试,B 组为 9 个月。A组患者从使用外固定物到拆除固定架的平均时间为6.1个月,B组患者为11个月。结论采用双焦点ASR技术和间充质干细胞浸润,在规定时间内对骨间隙患者进行CEF治疗,可以更快地实现骨愈合和拆除固定架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calcar referenced tip apex distance (CalTAD) – A better measuring tool to assess lag screw position in pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with twin screw cephalomedullary nails Practical challenges of the concept of using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of pediatric distal radius fractures Comparative analysis of surgical techniques for pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures: A focus on titanium flexible nails versus plates and screws Hip disarticulation for non-salvageable primary malignant sarcoma of femur: What were the oncological & functional outcomes? The effect of the Copenhagen Adduction and Nordic Hamstring exercises on muscle strength and athletic performance: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1