Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100230
Wenjing Luo , Qiuhong Zhou , Jingcan Xu , Zheyu Tan , Xinyi Li , Ying Ye , Honglin Wang , Shuyi Peng
{"title":"Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot risk screening scale for diabetic patients","authors":"Wenjing Luo ,&nbsp;Qiuhong Zhou ,&nbsp;Jingcan Xu ,&nbsp;Zheyu Tan ,&nbsp;Xinyi Li ,&nbsp;Ying Ye ,&nbsp;Honglin Wang ,&nbsp;Shuyi Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop a concise screening tool for diabetic foot risk assessment in patients with diabetes, and rigorously evaluate its reliability and validity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>390 adults diagnosed with diabetes were selected for a study in Changsha, China. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, initial items were developed by amalgamating existing diabetic foot risk screening tools and group discussions. Additionally, diabetic foot experts established content validity during this phase. In the second phase, the validity and reliability of the developed items were evaluated through various methods such as item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, ROC curve and AUC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Brief Diabetic Foot Risk Screening Scale consists of 6 dimensions and 19 items. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the scale, revealing six principal factors that accounted for 74.139 % of the total variance. The I-CVI was greater than 0.8, indicating good content validity, while the S-CVI was 0.737. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.770, indicating good internal consistency, and its test-retest reliability was 0.958. The AUC suggests that the Brief Diabetic Foot Risk Screening Scale is an effective measure for identifying diabetic foot.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing foot risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X24000572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop a concise screening tool for diabetic foot risk assessment in patients with diabetes, and rigorously evaluate its reliability and validity.

Methods

390 adults diagnosed with diabetes were selected for a study in Changsha, China. The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, initial items were developed by amalgamating existing diabetic foot risk screening tools and group discussions. Additionally, diabetic foot experts established content validity during this phase. In the second phase, the validity and reliability of the developed items were evaluated through various methods such as item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, ROC curve and AUC.

Results

The Brief Diabetic Foot Risk Screening Scale consists of 6 dimensions and 19 items. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on the scale, revealing six principal factors that accounted for 74.139 % of the total variance. The I-CVI was greater than 0.8, indicating good content validity, while the S-CVI was 0.737. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.770, indicating good internal consistency, and its test-retest reliability was 0.958. The AUC suggests that the Brief Diabetic Foot Risk Screening Scale is an effective measure for identifying diabetic foot.

Conclusion

The Scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing foot risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为糖尿病患者开发和验证简明糖尿病足风险筛查量表
方法 在中国长沙选取 390 名成年糖尿病患者进行研究。研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,通过合并现有的糖尿病足风险筛查工具和小组讨论,制定了初步的项目。此外,糖尿病足专家还在这一阶段确定了内容的有效性。第二阶段,通过项目分析、探索性因子分析、确认性因子分析、Cronbach's alpha 系数、重测信度、评分者间信度、ROC 曲线和 AUC 等多种方法对所开发项目的效度和信度进行评估。对该量表进行了探索性因子分析,结果显示有 6 个主因子,占总方差的 74.139%。I-CVI 大于 0.8,表明内容效度良好,而 S-CVI 为 0.737。确认性因素分析表明模型拟合良好。量表的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.770,表明其内部一致性良好,测试-再测信度为 0.958。AUC表明,糖尿病足风险简易筛查量表是识别糖尿病足的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of a nurse anesthetist student–led training program on perioperative pain management in total knee replacement: A prospective before and after study Associations between formal social support in early postpartum, parenting self-efficacy, and parent-infant bonding: A cross-sectional survey Development of a supportive-educative nursing model based on health promotion for independent wound care in diabetic foot ulcer patients: A cross-sectional study Expert to novice: Understanding the challenges of transition to the specialist community public health nurse - health visitor role and its implications for role retention. A constructivist grounded theory Auditory stimulation to reduce procedure pain in neonates: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1