Exploring the impact of integrating telehealth in obstetric care: A scoping review

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.031
Mara Tormen , Barbara Toniolo , Lucia Pecci , Giulia Soraci , Cristina Taliento , Pantaleo Greco , Stefano Salvioli
{"title":"Exploring the impact of integrating telehealth in obstetric care: A scoping review","authors":"Mara Tormen ,&nbsp;Barbara Toniolo ,&nbsp;Lucia Pecci ,&nbsp;Giulia Soraci ,&nbsp;Cristina Taliento ,&nbsp;Pantaleo Greco ,&nbsp;Stefano Salvioli","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The use of telemedicine has spread to all areas of medicine, including obstetrics, over the last few decades.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and map the diversity and applicability of telemedicine in the obstetric literature, in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. To assess patient satisfaction and possible areas for future development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and its extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched the databases PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), EMBASE Ovid and Scopus. We also searched Google Scholar, <span><span>clinicaltrial.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP-WHO) and the reference lists of the included studies. We included any primary study design that focused on a population of women in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. Studies selection and data extraction were performed blindly and independently by two authors. We summarised the results narratively and used graphs and tables to present key concepts thematically.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 66 studies. We categorised the studies according to population, type of intervention, outcomes and user satisfaction. Most of the studies involved pathological (36%) and physiological (30%) pregnancy management, the type of intervention was mainly divided into televisits or video calls with professionals (43%) and the use of specific apps or devices (40%). The maternal outcomes studied were mainly quantitative, i.e., improvement in blood chemistry tests or vital parameters (65%) and treatment adherence (frequency of follow-up visits or keeping appointments, 27%). Patient satisfaction was positive in the majority of cases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is still little international agreement on the concept and possible applications of telemedicine in obstetrics, although it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. Studies have shown positive results in terms of improved care, particularly in terms of treatment adherence and as an alternative strategy in the management of pregnancy, postpartum and abortion care. Both patients and health professionals were satisfied with it, especially when offered as a complement or alternative to the traditional method of face-to-face visits. Future developments seem to be the time and cost-saving potential of telemedicine and its application to couples’ infertility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 242-248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The use of telemedicine has spread to all areas of medicine, including obstetrics, over the last few decades.

Objective

To identify and map the diversity and applicability of telemedicine in the obstetric literature, in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. To assess patient satisfaction and possible areas for future development.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodological guidelines for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and its extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We searched the databases PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), EMBASE Ovid and Scopus. We also searched Google Scholar, clinicaltrial.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP-WHO) and the reference lists of the included studies. We included any primary study design that focused on a population of women in the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal period. Studies selection and data extraction were performed blindly and independently by two authors. We summarised the results narratively and used graphs and tables to present key concepts thematically.

Results

We included 66 studies. We categorised the studies according to population, type of intervention, outcomes and user satisfaction. Most of the studies involved pathological (36%) and physiological (30%) pregnancy management, the type of intervention was mainly divided into televisits or video calls with professionals (43%) and the use of specific apps or devices (40%). The maternal outcomes studied were mainly quantitative, i.e., improvement in blood chemistry tests or vital parameters (65%) and treatment adherence (frequency of follow-up visits or keeping appointments, 27%). Patient satisfaction was positive in the majority of cases.

Conclusions

There is still little international agreement on the concept and possible applications of telemedicine in obstetrics, although it is increasingly being used in clinical practice. Studies have shown positive results in terms of improved care, particularly in terms of treatment adherence and as an alternative strategy in the management of pregnancy, postpartum and abortion care. Both patients and health professionals were satisfied with it, especially when offered as a complement or alternative to the traditional method of face-to-face visits. Future developments seem to be the time and cost-saving potential of telemedicine and its application to couples’ infertility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨产科护理中整合远程医疗的影响:范围界定审查
背景在过去的几十年中,远程医疗的应用已扩展到包括产科在内的所有医学领域。目的在产科文献中识别和描绘产前、产中或产后远程医疗的多样性和适用性。评估患者的满意度以及未来可能的发展领域。方法本范围综述按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)范围综述方法指南进行,并根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)及其范围综述扩展项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行报告。我们检索了 PubMed (Medline)、CINAHL、CENTRAL (Cochrane Library)、EMBASE Ovid 和 Scopus 等数据库。我们还检索了 Google Scholar、clinicaltrial.gov、WHO 国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP-WHO)以及纳入研究的参考文献目录。我们纳入了任何以产前、产中或产后妇女为研究对象的主要研究设计。研究选择和数据提取由两位作者独立盲法完成。我们对结果进行了叙述性总结,并使用图表对关键概念进行了专题介绍。我们根据人群、干预类型、结果和用户满意度对研究进行了分类。大多数研究涉及病理性(36%)和生理性(30%)妊娠管理,干预类型主要分为与专业人员进行电视或视频通话(43%)以及使用特定应用程序或设备(40%)。所研究的孕产妇结果主要是定量的,即血液化学检测或生命参数的改善(65%)和治疗依从性(复诊频率或遵守预约,27%)。结论尽管远程医疗在临床实践中的应用越来越多,但国际上对远程医疗的概念和在产科中的可能应用仍鲜有共识。研究表明,远程医疗在改善医疗服务方面取得了积极成果,尤其是在坚持治疗方面,以及在妊娠管理、产后和流产护理方面作为一种替代策略。病人和医疗专业人员都对其表示满意,尤其是将其作为传统的面对面访问方法的补充或替代方法时。未来的发展似乎是远程医疗节省时间和成本的潜力及其在夫妇不孕症中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Maternal and perinatal outcomes following code red cesarean delivery performed among hospitals with different level of care. Case-control study of clotting differences using ROTEM testing in pregnant patients with early vaginal bleeding. Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1