63. An introduction to publicly available AI-assisted chatbot-style search engines for cancer variant curation

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Cancer Genetics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.065
Beth Pitel, Antonina Wojcik, Christy Koellner, Claire Teigen, Katherine Geiersbach, Patricia Greipp, Xinjie Xu, Cinthya Zepeda Mendoza
{"title":"63. An introduction to publicly available AI-assisted chatbot-style search engines for cancer variant curation","authors":"Beth Pitel,&nbsp;Antonina Wojcik,&nbsp;Christy Koellner,&nbsp;Claire Teigen,&nbsp;Katherine Geiersbach,&nbsp;Patricia Greipp,&nbsp;Xinjie Xu,&nbsp;Cinthya Zepeda Mendoza","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.08.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Publicly available artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-style search engines are gaining popularity for various applications, ranging from writing poetry to determining oncogenic cancer variants and genes. However, to our knowledge, a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of these tools in cancer variant interpretation is lacking in current literature.</div><div>In this proof-of-concept study, four free online AI-assisted search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, Claude AI, and Llama2) were given simple standardized queries to investigate the clinical relevance of multiple gene variants observed in lung adenocarcinoma, glioma, and acute myeloid leukemia. The queries were structured as follows: 'What is the clinical significance of [GENE] [protein-level (p.) nomenclature] in [cancer type]?'</div><div>As anticipated, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) illustrated challenges for using AI-assisted search engines in cancer variant interpretation. Each tool incorrectly attributed oncogenicity to at least 1 of the 6 VUS investigated: Perplexity AI (1/6 VUS incorrectly represented as oncogenic), ChatGPT (2/6), Llama2 (4/6), Claude AI (5/6).</div><div>The overestimation of oncogenicity in these tools may be driven by conditioning of these AI-assisted search engines by past and current users for positive assignation attributes or from application of a response format with incorrect extrapolation of studies describing variants in the same gene without the ability to draw nuanced conclusions from studies focusing on different aspects of gene function. While there are challenges in using AI-assisted search engines in the clinical genomic space currently, this rapidly improving technology could provide a useful supplement for cancer variant analysts when combined with caution and expert human oversight.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49225,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210776224001030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Publicly available artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot-style search engines are gaining popularity for various applications, ranging from writing poetry to determining oncogenic cancer variants and genes. However, to our knowledge, a systematic evaluation of the effectiveness of these tools in cancer variant interpretation is lacking in current literature.
In this proof-of-concept study, four free online AI-assisted search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity AI, Claude AI, and Llama2) were given simple standardized queries to investigate the clinical relevance of multiple gene variants observed in lung adenocarcinoma, glioma, and acute myeloid leukemia. The queries were structured as follows: 'What is the clinical significance of [GENE] [protein-level (p.) nomenclature] in [cancer type]?'
As anticipated, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) illustrated challenges for using AI-assisted search engines in cancer variant interpretation. Each tool incorrectly attributed oncogenicity to at least 1 of the 6 VUS investigated: Perplexity AI (1/6 VUS incorrectly represented as oncogenic), ChatGPT (2/6), Llama2 (4/6), Claude AI (5/6).
The overestimation of oncogenicity in these tools may be driven by conditioning of these AI-assisted search engines by past and current users for positive assignation attributes or from application of a response format with incorrect extrapolation of studies describing variants in the same gene without the ability to draw nuanced conclusions from studies focusing on different aspects of gene function. While there are challenges in using AI-assisted search engines in the clinical genomic space currently, this rapidly improving technology could provide a useful supplement for cancer variant analysts when combined with caution and expert human oversight.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
63.介绍用于癌症变异体整理的公开可用的人工智能辅助聊天机器人式搜索引擎
公共可用的人工智能(AI)聊天机器人式搜索引擎在从写诗到确定致癌变异体和基因等各种应用中越来越受欢迎。在这项概念验证研究中,我们给四个免费的在线人工智能辅助搜索引擎(ChatGPT、Perplexity AI、Claude AI 和 Llama2)提供了简单的标准化查询,以调查在肺腺癌、胶质瘤和急性髓性白血病中观察到的多个基因变异的临床相关性。查询的结构如下'[基因][蛋白质级(p.)命名法]在[癌症类型]中的临床意义是什么?"正如预期的那样,意义不确定的变异(VUS)说明了在癌症变异解释中使用人工智能辅助搜索引擎所面临的挑战。在所调查的 6 个 VUS 中,每个工具都至少有 1 个错误地归因于致癌性:这些工具对致癌性的高估可能是由于过去和现在的用户对这些人工智能辅助搜索引擎的正向分配属性进行了调节,或者是由于应用了一种响应格式,对描述同一基因中变异的研究进行了错误的外推,而无法从关注基因功能不同方面的研究中得出细微的结论。虽然目前在临床基因组学领域使用人工智能辅助搜索引擎还存在一些挑战,但这种快速进步的技术如果能与谨慎和专家的人工监督相结合,就能为癌症变异分析人员提供有益的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Genetics
Cancer Genetics ONCOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
167
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Cancer Genetics is to publish high quality scientific papers on the cellular, genetic and molecular aspects of cancer, including cancer predisposition and clinical diagnostic applications. Specific areas of interest include descriptions of new chromosomal, molecular or epigenetic alterations in benign and malignant diseases; novel laboratory approaches for identification and characterization of chromosomal rearrangements or genomic alterations in cancer cells; correlation of genetic changes with pathology and clinical presentation; and the molecular genetics of cancer predisposition. To reach a basic science and clinical multidisciplinary audience, we welcome original full-length articles, reviews, meeting summaries, brief reports, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Identification and characterization of ADAR1 mutations and changes in gene expression in human cancers Recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities reveal alterations that promote progression and transformation in myelodysplastic syndrome Potential use of SCAT1, SCAT2, and SCAT8 as diagnostic and prognosis markers in colorectal cancer Elucidating the prognostic and therapeutic significance of TOP2A in various malignancies Influence of polymorphisms on the phenotype of TLR1, TLR4 and TLR9 genes and their association with cervical cancer: Bioinformatics prediction analysis and a case-control study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1