Mitchell Mika , Allison Probert , Assel Aitkaliyeva
{"title":"Nuclear fuel qualification: History, current state, and future","authors":"Mitchell Mika , Allison Probert , Assel Aitkaliyeva","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The qualification of nuclear fuel is the process by which a fuel is certified for use within a reactor design. This process involves massive technical and procedural coordination across multiple private and public institutions with long project completion timelines. The current frameworks published in literature do not address the roles of private reactor developers in the qualification process, nor the regulatory requirements that form the background for fuel qualification. These roles and requirements are not static and have evolved throughout the development of the commercial nuclear industry. UO<sub>2</sub> fuel, the only fuel considered fully qualified today, achieved its status in large part due to its early selection and rapid deployment under a still developing regulatory landscape. Today, fuel qualification efforts must operate within modern regulatory realities, which will require extensive testing and model development. Building on the existing fuel qualification frameworks, we define the optimal roles of the parties involved with fuel qualification. We also suggest viewing experimental efforts through a data-centric perspective in which parallel improvements can be made in collection, processing, and storage to facilitate quicker qualification timelines. These efforts then promote advanced modeling efforts, such as mechanistic modeling and digital twin development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 105460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The qualification of nuclear fuel is the process by which a fuel is certified for use within a reactor design. This process involves massive technical and procedural coordination across multiple private and public institutions with long project completion timelines. The current frameworks published in literature do not address the roles of private reactor developers in the qualification process, nor the regulatory requirements that form the background for fuel qualification. These roles and requirements are not static and have evolved throughout the development of the commercial nuclear industry. UO2 fuel, the only fuel considered fully qualified today, achieved its status in large part due to its early selection and rapid deployment under a still developing regulatory landscape. Today, fuel qualification efforts must operate within modern regulatory realities, which will require extensive testing and model development. Building on the existing fuel qualification frameworks, we define the optimal roles of the parties involved with fuel qualification. We also suggest viewing experimental efforts through a data-centric perspective in which parallel improvements can be made in collection, processing, and storage to facilitate quicker qualification timelines. These efforts then promote advanced modeling efforts, such as mechanistic modeling and digital twin development.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field.
Please note the following:
1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy.
2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc.
3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.