Nuclear fuel qualification: History, current state, and future

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Progress in Nuclear Energy Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105460
Mitchell Mika , Allison Probert , Assel Aitkaliyeva
{"title":"Nuclear fuel qualification: History, current state, and future","authors":"Mitchell Mika ,&nbsp;Allison Probert ,&nbsp;Assel Aitkaliyeva","doi":"10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The qualification of nuclear fuel is the process by which a fuel is certified for use within a reactor design. This process involves massive technical and procedural coordination across multiple private and public institutions with long project completion timelines. The current frameworks published in literature do not address the roles of private reactor developers in the qualification process, nor the regulatory requirements that form the background for fuel qualification. These roles and requirements are not static and have evolved throughout the development of the commercial nuclear industry. UO<sub>2</sub> fuel, the only fuel considered fully qualified today, achieved its status in large part due to its early selection and rapid deployment under a still developing regulatory landscape. Today, fuel qualification efforts must operate within modern regulatory realities, which will require extensive testing and model development. Building on the existing fuel qualification frameworks, we define the optimal roles of the parties involved with fuel qualification. We also suggest viewing experimental efforts through a data-centric perspective in which parallel improvements can be made in collection, processing, and storage to facilitate quicker qualification timelines. These efforts then promote advanced modeling efforts, such as mechanistic modeling and digital twin development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20617,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 105460"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Nuclear Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149197024004104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The qualification of nuclear fuel is the process by which a fuel is certified for use within a reactor design. This process involves massive technical and procedural coordination across multiple private and public institutions with long project completion timelines. The current frameworks published in literature do not address the roles of private reactor developers in the qualification process, nor the regulatory requirements that form the background for fuel qualification. These roles and requirements are not static and have evolved throughout the development of the commercial nuclear industry. UO2 fuel, the only fuel considered fully qualified today, achieved its status in large part due to its early selection and rapid deployment under a still developing regulatory landscape. Today, fuel qualification efforts must operate within modern regulatory realities, which will require extensive testing and model development. Building on the existing fuel qualification frameworks, we define the optimal roles of the parties involved with fuel qualification. We also suggest viewing experimental efforts through a data-centric perspective in which parallel improvements can be made in collection, processing, and storage to facilitate quicker qualification timelines. These efforts then promote advanced modeling efforts, such as mechanistic modeling and digital twin development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核燃料鉴定:历史、现状和未来
核燃料鉴定是对反应堆设计中使用的燃料进行认证的过程。这一过程涉及多个私营和公共机构的大规模技术和程序协调,项目完成时间较长。文献中公布的现有框架并未涉及私营反应堆开发商在鉴定过程中的角色,也未涉及构成燃料鉴定背景的监管要求。这些角色和要求并不是一成不变的,在商业核工业的整个发展过程中都在不断演变。二氧化铀燃料是当今唯一一种被认为完全合格的燃料,它之所以能取得这样的地位,在很大程度上要归功于其早期的选择以及在仍在发展中的监管环境下的快速部署。如今,燃料鉴定工作必须在现代监管现实下进行,这就需要进行广泛的测试和模型开发。在现有燃料鉴定框架的基础上,我们定义了参与燃料鉴定的各方的最佳角色。我们还建议通过以数据为中心的视角来看待实验工作,在收集、处理和存储方面进行并行改进,以加快鉴定时间。这些工作将促进先进的建模工作,如机械建模和数字孪生开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Nuclear Energy
Progress in Nuclear Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Nuclear Energy is an international review journal covering all aspects of nuclear science and engineering. In keeping with the maturity of nuclear power, articles on safety, siting and environmental problems are encouraged, as are those associated with economics and fuel management. However, basic physics and engineering will remain an important aspect of the editorial policy. Articles published are either of a review nature or present new material in more depth. They are aimed at researchers and technically-oriented managers working in the nuclear energy field. Please note the following: 1) PNE seeks high quality research papers which are medium to long in length. Short research papers should be submitted to the journal Annals in Nuclear Energy. 2) PNE reserves the right to reject papers which are based solely on routine application of computer codes used to produce reactor designs or explain existing reactor phenomena. Such papers, although worthy, are best left as laboratory reports whereas Progress in Nuclear Energy seeks papers of originality, which are archival in nature, in the fields of mathematical and experimental nuclear technology, including fission, fusion (blanket physics, radiation damage), safety, materials aspects, economics, etc. 3) Review papers, which may occasionally be invited, are particularly sought by the journal in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Nonlinear vibrations analysis of a fuel rod in nuclear heating reactor Experimental and model development of lead-bismuth eutectic solidification phenomenon flowing inside the tube Machine learning in critical heat flux studies in nuclear systems: A detailed review Experimental study of three-dimensional trajectory and dynamic characteristics of rising bubbles China's law and policy initiatives for integrating nuclear energy in maritime applications: A critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1