Definitive particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for dedifferentiated liposarcoma

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100864
{"title":"Definitive particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for dedifferentiated liposarcoma","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Particle therapy is effective for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, the clinical outcomes of definitive particle therapy, particularly for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), remain unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To analyze the treatment outcomes of proton and carbon ion particle therapies for DDLS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively included patients with DDLS who were treated with particle therapy between 2008 and 2022. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 36–91 years). The most common tumor site was the retroperitoneum (n = 37), with a median gross tumor volume (GTV) of 181 cm<sup>3</sup>. Twenty-nine patients received proton therapy, and 28 patients received carbon ion therapy. The most common fractionation dose was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions (72.7 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]). The median follow-up time was 33 months (range, 1–128 months). The 3-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 73.1 %, 44.6 %, and 70.6 %, respectively. Patients who received a higher prescribed dose (≥72.7 Gy EQD2) showed significantly better LC (p = 0.04) than did those who received a lower prescribed dose. Moreover, those with a larger GTV (≥181 cm<sup>3</sup>) had significantly worse OS (p = 0.04) than did those with a smaller GTV. Late adverse events occurred in five (9 %) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for the treatment of DDLS is safe and provides good OS and LC. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger cohorts are warranted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Particle therapy is effective for the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, the clinical outcomes of definitive particle therapy, particularly for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS), remain unknown.

Purpose

To analyze the treatment outcomes of proton and carbon ion particle therapies for DDLS.

Methods

We retrospectively included patients with DDLS who were treated with particle therapy between 2008 and 2022. The local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. The median patient age was 68 years (range, 36–91 years). The most common tumor site was the retroperitoneum (n = 37), with a median gross tumor volume (GTV) of 181 cm3. Twenty-nine patients received proton therapy, and 28 patients received carbon ion therapy. The most common fractionation dose was 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions (72.7 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions [EQD2]). The median follow-up time was 33 months (range, 1–128 months). The 3-year LC, PFS, and OS rates were 73.1 %, 44.6 %, and 70.6 %, respectively. Patients who received a higher prescribed dose (≥72.7 Gy EQD2) showed significantly better LC (p = 0.04) than did those who received a lower prescribed dose. Moreover, those with a larger GTV (≥181 cm3) had significantly worse OS (p = 0.04) than did those with a smaller GTV. Late adverse events occurred in five (9 %) patients.

Conclusions

Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for the treatment of DDLS is safe and provides good OS and LC. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods and larger cohorts are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用质子或碳离子对已分化脂肪肉瘤进行确定性粒子治疗
背景粒子疗法是治疗软组织肉瘤的有效方法。目的 分析质子和碳离子粒子疗法对 DDLS 的治疗效果。方法 我们回顾性地纳入了 2008 年至 2022 年期间接受粒子疗法治疗的 DDLS 患者,并对其局部控制率(LC)、无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)进行了评估。方法我们回顾性地纳入了 2008 年至 2022 年间接受粒子治疗的 DDLS 患者,评估了局部控制率(LC)、无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)。患者年龄中位数为 68 岁(36-91 岁)。最常见的肿瘤部位是腹膜后(37 例),中位肿瘤总体积(GTV)为 181 立方厘米。29名患者接受了质子治疗,28名患者接受了碳离子治疗。最常见的分次剂量为 70.4 Gy(相对生物效应),分 32 次进行(72.7 Gy 等效剂量,分 2 Gy [EQD2])。中位随访时间为33个月(1-128个月)。3年LC、PFS和OS率分别为73.1%、44.6%和70.6%。与接受较低处方剂量的患者相比,接受较高处方剂量(≥72.7 Gy EQD2)的患者的LC明显更好(p = 0.04)。此外,GTV较大(≥181 cm3)的患者的OS明显比GTV较小的患者差(p = 0.04)。结论使用质子或碳离子进行粒子疗法治疗DDLS是安全的,并能提供良好的OS和LC。然而,还需要进行随访时间更长、队列更大的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1