Towards Robust Evaluation of Aesthetic and Photographic Quality Metrics: Insights from a Comprehensive Dataset

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Complexity Pub Date : 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1155/2024/8223586
Iria Santos, Miguel A. Casal, João Correia, Álvaro Torrente-Patiño, Penousal Machado, Juan Romero
{"title":"Towards Robust Evaluation of Aesthetic and Photographic Quality Metrics: Insights from a Comprehensive Dataset","authors":"Iria Santos,&nbsp;Miguel A. Casal,&nbsp;João Correia,&nbsp;Álvaro Torrente-Patiño,&nbsp;Penousal Machado,&nbsp;Juan Romero","doi":"10.1155/2024/8223586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>In recent years, the development of metrics to evaluate image aesthetics and photographic quality has proliferated. However, validating these metrics presents challenges due to the inherently subjective nature of aesthetics and photographic quality, which can be influenced by cultural contexts and individual preferences that evolve over time. This article presents a novel validation methodology utilizing a dataset assessed by individuals from two distinct nationalities: the United States and Spain. Evaluation criteria include photographic quality and aesthetic value, with the dataset comprising images previously rated on the DPChallenge photographic portal. We analyze the correlation between these values and provide the dataset for future research endeavors. Our investigation encompasses several metrics, including BRISQUE for assessing photographic quality, NIMA aesthetic and NIMA technical for evaluating both aesthetic and technical aspects, Diffusion Aesthetics (employed in Stable Diffusion), and PhotoILike for gauging the commercial appeal of real estate images. Our findings reveal a significant correlation between the Diffusion Aesthetics metric and aesthetic measures, as well as with the NIMA aesthetics metric, suggesting them as good potential candidates to capture aesthetic value.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8223586","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8223586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, the development of metrics to evaluate image aesthetics and photographic quality has proliferated. However, validating these metrics presents challenges due to the inherently subjective nature of aesthetics and photographic quality, which can be influenced by cultural contexts and individual preferences that evolve over time. This article presents a novel validation methodology utilizing a dataset assessed by individuals from two distinct nationalities: the United States and Spain. Evaluation criteria include photographic quality and aesthetic value, with the dataset comprising images previously rated on the DPChallenge photographic portal. We analyze the correlation between these values and provide the dataset for future research endeavors. Our investigation encompasses several metrics, including BRISQUE for assessing photographic quality, NIMA aesthetic and NIMA technical for evaluating both aesthetic and technical aspects, Diffusion Aesthetics (employed in Stable Diffusion), and PhotoILike for gauging the commercial appeal of real estate images. Our findings reveal a significant correlation between the Diffusion Aesthetics metric and aesthetic measures, as well as with the NIMA aesthetics metric, suggesting them as good potential candidates to capture aesthetic value.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现对美学和摄影质量指标的可靠评估:综合数据集的启示
近年来,用于评价图像美学和摄影质量的指标层出不穷。然而,由于美学和摄影质量本身具有主观性,会受到文化背景和随时间演变的个人偏好的影响,因此验证这些指标面临着挑战。本文介绍了一种新颖的验证方法,该方法利用了由来自美国和西班牙两个不同国家的个人评估的数据集。评估标准包括摄影质量和美学价值,数据集包括之前在 DPChallenge 摄影门户网站上评分的图片。我们分析了这些价值之间的相关性,并为未来的研究工作提供了数据集。我们的研究涵盖多个指标,包括用于评估摄影质量的 BRISQUE、用于评估美学和技术方面的 NIMA aesthetic 和 NIMA technical、Diffusion Aesthetics(在 Stable Diffusion 中使用)以及用于衡量房地产图片商业吸引力的 PhotoILike。我们的研究结果表明,"扩散美学 "度量指标与美学度量指标以及 NIMA 美学度量指标之间存在明显的相关性,这表明它们是捕捉美学价值的潜在候选指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
期刊最新文献
The General Biological Relativity Theory and Multiscale Modeling of Living Systems as Complex Systems Text Classification of Multiple Datasets Based on Multidimensional Information Effects of Alumina–Tantalum Hybrid Nanofragment on Engine Oil Flow Using a New Local Thermal Nonequilibrium Formulation A Real-Time Apple Maturity Detection Method Combining Lightweight Networks and Multiscale Attention Mechanisms Intrusion Detection in IoT Using Deep Recurrent Neural Networks: A Complex Network Approach to Modeling Emergent Cyberattack Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1